News > Featured, Homepage Feature, In the News, News

Anonymous No More?

Some outside groups might have to disclose previously anonymous donors

Karl Rove's super PAC is hiding its donors by using 501(c)(4) affiliated groups.

Exciting news from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit…and no, that’s not an oxymoron. Nonprofit groups running campaign ads now have to reveal the names of their donors, thanks to a ruling by the court on campaign finance law.

NPR reports:

Several weeks ago, a federal court in Washington told the Federal Election Commission it could not allow the buyers of tens of millions of dollars’ worth of ads to remain anonymous.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit late Monday, on a 2-to-1 vote, refused to grant a stay of that decision pending appeal. It ordered the full appeal to be heard sometime this fall.

At issue is the ability of tax-exempt groups that run political ads within two months of the general election — or within one month of a primary — to keep secret the names of their donors. Such groups spent some $80 million in the 2010 congressional elections, primarily supporting conservative candidates or attacking their opponents. The donors behind less than 10 percent of that amount were ever disclosed.

The Huffington Post points out that this applies to Karl Rove’s Crossroads groups and those supported by the Koch Brothers. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll actually listen:

…But whether the non-disclosing groups will suddenly change their behavior — or gamble that they can continue to skirt disclosure requirements — remains unclear. ‘That is the million-dollar question,’ Malloy said. ‘Or more like the $100 million question.’ Campaign law expert Rick Hasen blogged that he expects the ‘stay request to now end up before the Supreme Court, where the outcome may be different.’”


Suzanne Merkelson is the Associate Web Editor for United Republic, where she curates and comments on the day’s top money-in-politics news. She previously produced web content for Foreign Policy magazine and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Foreign Policy, and The Atlantic, among others.

Get Involved

Comments

  • EJ

    I just joined, and I’m so happy that something could be done to stop buying all these races including the White House. Bless everyone who is a part of this.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Linus-Pedersen/1374578921 Michael Linus Pedersen

    Now will DOJ enforce this?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Terry-Van-Remortel/1347125209 Terry Van Remortel

    This is WHY Scott Walker has been able to outspend Tom Barrett by over 25-1 NOW and keep HIS lying ads running on the air nationwide NON-STOP> Wisconsin IS the “great experiment” for whether or not a politician, in spite of all the lies he got red-handed doing on FILM and on the phone, has set up his own crimminal defense fund for camnpaigning while he was Milwaukee County Executive ON the taxpayer dime using the Exec’s office, computers and staff to do it, will get elected. PEOPLE over big money buying our Democracy in a post citizens united country. YOU decide!!!!

  • Larkspur

    If only the jails could be filled with these people instead of those protesting the havoc they are dropping on us.  The Koch brothers are starting to complain though about the negative attention and claim to be receiving death threats.
    So I guess our efforts are working after all.

  • JustZap

    This would ultimalately expose who bought obama besides Soros

  • Meerajgn

    The amount of money spent for elections has always been obscene. This has been compounded by the citizens united decision. Not disclosing donors names makes our government the puppet of the rich, if it was not already held hostage by them. How do the disadvantaged and the under represented have a say?

Take Action

Donate

Republic Forum

Follow us

Join the Republic
continue to United Republic »