Take Action

Sign your name to help us get 20,000 people demanding the US Supreme Court stop billionaires from buying our politicians and our laws.

    20,000 Americans wrote a letter to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    You told the Court to reverse Citizens United.

    It’s time to stop billionaires from buying our democracy, so we printed every comment on this page and hand-delivered them to the Supreme Court:

     

    Senators McCain, Whitehouse, and others, along with 22 states and thousands of Americans, are standing with the Montana State Supreme Court in saying “Hell no!” to Citizens United.

    And so are we.

    For more information:

    Wall Street Journal: 22 States Join Campaign Finance Fight

    The Washington Post: Supreme Court faces pressure to reconsider Citizens United ruling

    Amicus Brief Filed By Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and John McCain on Montana’s American Tradition Partnership vs. Bullock

    Free Speech For People: Can Montana Brief End Citizens United?

    Brennan Center: Supreme Court: Uphold Montana’s Ban on Corporate Election Spending, Revisit Citizens United

    Comments

    • Kay Lightner

      Citizens United took away the right of the common citizen to elect our public officials.  We do not want our public officals bought by large corporations.  This ruling is a travesty.  We are tired of being walked on.  Overturn Citizens United.

    • Diane L Dinorscia

      Please overturn Citizens United – - there is no unity in this — only the rich buying elections. 

    • Mamazon

      The Citizen’s UIntied decision needs to be repealed as it turns our form of government from democracy into fascism. Certain menbers of the Supreme Court appear to be bought and paid for by the same corporations who want to use their money to buy elections… IT’S JUST PLAIN WRONG!

    • Caroline A

      Citizens United was one of the WORST decisions every made!

    • Gary Illman

      This was about the worst ruling of the court ever.  If corporations have rights, they must have obligations associated with those rights.  What are their obligations? 

    • Buzz Green

      citizens united is a travesty and doesn’t even deserve caps!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000289385825 Kathy Smith

      Thank you for doing this! The misnomered “Citizens United” ruling of the Supreme Court is good to overturn because corporations are not to have undue influence on elections.

    • Jean M. Carlick

      Please reconsider Citizens United–it makes a mockery of democracy.

    • A. Silver

      Chief Justice Roberts,   Citizens United did not work out like you thought it would.  Man up and fix what you broke with your ill-coneived Supreme Court decision.

    • Maureenjmiller

      Please overturn this ruling or please pass a campaign finance bill that will stand up toe Supreme Court scrutiny.

    • Kathleen

      Citizens United takes voting rights away from the rest of us by allowing corporate “persons” to buy our democracy. Congress must pass legislation to nulllify the Supreme Court decison. 

    • Tim Douglas

      Please reconsider the Citizens United ruling.

    • jcman

      If a corporation is a person they why aren’t they put in jail like a person when they break the law?

    • Bob Conway

      Money is NOT speech. Money is money. Speech is speech. Please reconsider!

    • S.Keenan

      Please overturn Citizens United. It is merely Money United against the citizens of this great country

    • John Quinn

      Get your head out of the politics and make a decision based on law, that’s what the forefathers intended your branch to do.  Here’s your chance, get rid of Citizens United

      • Nnnooccc

        The Supreme Court may be to busy altering the spirit and the intent of the law.  They may have little time for reality and damage control. – even if they were so inclined, which I doubt.

    • Billhalatsis

      Citizens have the right to “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness”  Corporations do not have life, there fore they are not persons. Change it now or go DOWN in history.

    • Someone

      Where is a copy of the letter?

    • Conoclast

      To the SCOTUS: what did you THINK would happen if Big Biz is given the right to buy our elections process?

    • Ruth

      We will never have a representative government in this country as long as elections are bought and wall street controls the Congress as Bernie Sanders so pointedly stated yesterday.  Listening to politicans bad-mouthing each other to the tune of billions of dollars in ads paid for by Super Paks when people in this country are starving and out of work and can’t afford a college education doesn’t encourage voters to go to the polls– it simply confirms the opinion of many non-voters of voting age that all politicans are corrupt and that none of them represent the interests of their constiuents; instead, if elected, they kowtow to the special interest groups who have brought this country to its economic knees.  Further, the United States Supreme Court is supposed to apply the law, not politics, to its decisions, and Citizens United was obviously a political decision. The only answer  here is to get money out of politics and overturning the decision in Citizens United will at least be a beginning.  Ruh Hindman

    • Halcyonblake

      I am so pleased to see a bipartisan effort to overturn this egregious decision and take us toward a sane system of campaign finance.

    • JD

      The Citizens United Decision was a giant leap towards democracy for sale to the highest bidder.  Please repeal it at once!

    • Robert Griffin

      “We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American Eagle in order to feather their own nests”  - Franklin D. Roosevelt  1932

      • HopeforAmerica

         Robert; Thanks for sharing a great quote! I’ll be sharing it with friends and other like-minded people.

      • Anna McCall-Tanzola

        I would like to “borrow” this, please.  I’m counting on your not objecting.  :-)

    • Thomas W Jay

      If corporation is a person shouldn’t they have US citizenship first to be represented?
      Congress would not represent a foreigner. Why is congress representing multinational corporation? Stop Citizens United, it is damaging our country. 

    • Hal

      I telly DON’T wan he best government mony can buy. I want votes based on un-spun policy to decide, thank you very much!

    • Mhunter

      Yes, add my name to the Supreme Court ruling for their Citizens United ruling !!!!!!
      Corporations are not people.

    • Sharon Sandell

      The adage, “money talks,” is just that–it appears some otherwise intelligent people sitting on this court take it literally.  A corporation is not a sentient being; it cannot be a citizen, vote in a state or federal election, or perform any of the biological functions of a human being (breathe, eat, eliminate, walk, talk, think, exist as a biological entity).  Money is not speech and incorporation cannot magically grant biological sentience required of personhood.  While the legal jargon behind the concept of incorporation may have confused some of the judges on this court, it appears they threw logic out the window when they tried to use the semantics which allow a business that has incorporated to shield the real people who are participants, you seemed to have forgotten that the intent of the laws of incorporation were to protect real, live, sentient persons that form a corporation or own part of one.  Until corporations do not need real people to function, they are not people and not entitled to the fiction of personhood for political purposes.  This has to be the worst ruling in the history of the Supreme Court (although the appointment of George W. Bush as President is very close); it takes semantic-twisting to new levels and shows us that those who ruled in favor of Citizens United were operating solely on a political agenda (ala Milton Friedman), but not truely protecting and defending the U. S. Consititution or even demonstrating a shred of deductive logic. 

    • HopeforAmerica

      It does not matter what one’s views swing left or right. This is one issue we an ALL Agree on. Citizen’s United destroys our democracy!  We need to take the money out of politics or we will never have a true democracy. 

    • dimcfan

      Democracy is not free, but it should not be for sale.  Voters, not billionaires with their own selfish interests, should decide our elections.

    • Lindberg2mo

      Please repeal this decision and help make this year’s elections fair and honest! Thank you.

    • Frank122

      I agree that this ruling by the Supreme Court was crap, and I hope they overturn it, but if they really want to fix the problem, all congress has to do is make lobbying illegal. I guess they think it will be easier to convince a simple majority of nine people to do the right thing than a super majority of congress.

    • Trevor Karmanian

      citizens unite! …to overturn ‘citizens united’ why is this called exactly what it isn’t..

    • Carol Pracna

      Our elected representatives in Congress now spend their time raising money, instead of on the critical issues faced by America. Stop that by Campaign Finance Reform/Public Funding of elections; then Congress should improve and corporations will not be able to buy/bribe electors. Lets open to candidates the broadcasting frequencies owned by all of us, and have limits on spending!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001289711137 Louise Dotter

      14th Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to
      the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the
      State wherein they reside.”  Corporations are not born and therefore can’t be citizens! 

    • paul rust

      When the peoples vote is swayed by money America is on a downward spiral into a cast like system where we have the few, the very rich and two classes of poor.  Very poor and just poor like other countrys have.  Make no mistake about it, the ul;tra rich would love this.!

    • KJBunn

      Thank goodness!!! And thank you Senators McCain and Whitehouse. This is the right thing to do.

    • Carrie Benson

      I heard a defender of Citizen’s United claim it gives us more information, as if that information was unbiased and truthful.  What it really does is give the extremely rich the unchecked ability to spread propaganda in support of the puppets they are supporting for office.  Overturn Citizen’s United, the worst decision ever made by SCOTUS.

    • Cswanee

      “Independent” campaigns should not be able to subvert democracy by using Madison-avenue developed sales tactics to buy elections by selling ideas.  People should be able to decide the rights that a democracy wishes to give to corporations – there are no inalienable rights that a state-chartered entity necessarily has.  

    • CTD

      Citizens united ruling is ruining America.  Rescind that ruling now!

    • Mbbarden

      We’ve turned our elections into a poker game where the rich can bluff and stuff while thew middle class cannot afford the table stakes and thus are out of the game.  May God damn the Supreme Court conservatives and those that put them there … .  They are wrecking the country.  

    • edward jagusiak

      Swallow your pride,overide your previous ruling.

    • P Allen

      Wow…There is some sanity left in Washington. Yes this is past do. Thanks to both Senators…you have made my day. Stay with it. I am also going to e-mail my Senators and tell them to get on board with this issue. Citizens United is bad for our country.

    • Janiceluippold

      This is needed to get b ack to the old days.  Money is ruinning our democracy. 

    • Davebartoli

      Can we overturn corporate person hood next? 

      • Nnnooccc

        We will have to ask the Supreme Court?

    • Helenerickson

      I applaud Senators McCain and Whitehouse and stand with them. This is the worst decision ever made by the Supreme Court. Please reverse it NOW

    • Middlepass

      Nothing is more corrosive to our democracy than unlimited corporate money influencing elections.  McCain and Whitehouse have both my respect and my support.

    • Rdspratt

      These pompous Supreme Court members are not stupid.  They knew what they were doing.  I signed the petition, but they will only listen to their corporate masters.  The Roberts” Court is easily the most biased in my lifetime.  I’d say “shame on you”, but they have no shame.

    • Mimi

      If we want our democracy to last, we MUST overturn this.  This was an unthinkable mistake that the supreme court has made.  If it is not, our children will no longer enjoy the benefits of living in a democracy.

    • Jean Snow

      I’m 88 years old and also say “Hell, No!” to Citizens United.  This corruption is a disgrace to the country I’ve loved all my life!

      • Oapuli1

        Amen to that

    • Rixar13

        Thumbs up ^….

    • Jack Rooney

      I strongly support the efforts of the
      good Senators asking the Supreme court to revisit the Citizens United
      ruling. Corporations are not people in the Constitutional sense of
      the term “people” All corporate speech is commercial promotion
      of the bottom line of the corporation no matter what public-minded
      motive the corporation might want to imply, and it may be regulated
      by the People in the same manner and for the same public good as the
      law requires health warnings on cigarette packs.

    • Birdogart

      Our Supreme Court’s Citizen’s United Ruling has turned Government by the People on its head! Everyone knows that the Court’s Conservative judges favor business profit over humanity, but giving corporations and billionaires absolute power is the end of Democracy! As far as I’m concerned, it’s the end of America as a place for ordinary people to thrive! We must overcome!   

    • Gil Miranda

      It is time the U.S. Supreme Court cleans an indecorous judicial (activist) blunder that shames us all – its 5-4 ruling on CITIZENS UNITED.

    • Kingkromm

      It’s abuot time that common sense rules, not the corporations! Corporations are not people. You and I are people!

    • STWolfgang

      But I so LOVE, “$1, One Vote!

    • Jerry Omalley

      I have little faith that the politically motivated right-wing justices will do anything to reverse this disgraceful abuse of their office. I still must demand that they hear our voices!

    • gsaalfield

      Perhaps more than any other issue, ‘Citizens United’ has done just that; united us against it!

    • Dave Swarthout

      Please help reverse this travesty foisted upon us by the SCOTUS. It is an outrage! Get the money out of politics!

    • Janice

      Save our democracy from this never-should-have-been-made ruling that is destroying the voice of the majority of Americans.

    • Jd Pipes

      The voice of the people is being stilled by the rich and powerful. Corporations ARE NOT PEOPLE! Give us our country back!

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/RPPH3S7BVSZNJMKKI45V6MI5FM Carl Shank

      It’s never too late, get the money out now!!!!How could  this Supreme Cort rule as they did????

    • katog617

      Let our votes count!  Let the elected represent the interests of the people who voted for them and not the corporations who have been buying them.  

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/BIQTN2AXNWXIICSXWICO2DJ63Y nycitydane
    • Elatad

      The Citizens United ruling has damaged the foundation of our democracy. I applaud and support the Senators who are taking on this unconstitutional ruling by our sell out supreme court justices.

    • Gerald Swanson

      Only humans are persons.  Any other view is foolishness, and a disgrace to the Supreme Court.

    • Rchatwin

      This goes to directly authorizing our representatives to vote the way their donors way.  It has nothing to do with corporations are people.  I know that my contributions can no way compete.

    • http://www.facebook.com/toni.barton.54 Toni Barton

      Thank you Senator McCain for extracting yourself from the “no machine” known today as the Republican Party.  This legalized bribery must stop.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XSO4CTG6UMCVOYIECOX2WVTZTI Scott

      We want a democracy, not a plutocracy.

    • Sunfishsailor

      I would donate money except for my rigid rule: Donate only to Planned Parenthood of Minnesota. They are getting all my funds in my will. 

    • Christ P. Panos

      I can’t think of anything more of a threat to democracy than Citizens United – they think they can buy our rights and need to be stopped

    • TSO

      I am SICK of watching big corporations BUYING elections!  It happened right here in Washington state by Costco privatizing liquor sales.  It also happened in my job when Lockheed Martin took over (and ruined) the Flight Service network.  

    • Lwalk

      With the wealthy 1% buying and selling our elected officials, J”We the people” are at the mursy of their whims!  With OUT the 99% having disposable cash in their pockets (the PROFIT of workers after they pay their fixed expenses, there is nothing left over to fule the economy.  Big Corporations certainly have the right to make a FAIR peofit, but so do their workers deserve a living wage,where they can support small business.  I  NEVER saw a limo parket infront of a hardware store, pizza shop or any other small businges making a purchase to help the small business exhist, it is the middle income Americans who keep small businesses in business.

    • Bill

      Stop – “Goverment of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.

    • Favritthings

      The ruling in favor of Citizens United shows that even Supreme Court Judges can make mistakes.  Theirs was a decision sure to end in calamity for out elections, whether they are local or national.  Please show your courage and revisit your decision soon.

    • oldmezzo99

      “I’ll believe a corporation is a person WHEN Texas puts one to death!”

    • Spokomojo

      Doctors, lawyers, merchants, thieves; none should have the right to buy our Congress.  Money is not Speech.  Our Founding Fathers did not fight for an oligarchy, they fought to establish a Republic.  Our people have fought & died for this principle – our government should respect that simple concept.

    • Mgb

      The rich and business people DO NOT CREATE JOBS! This is a BIG LIE created to con the American people. Jobs are created by the Middle Class and NOT the wealthy or corporations.

      REASON 1: If you take all the money out of the middle class and give to the rich and big corporations they why would they want to spend money creating jobs to produce something that no one has they money to buy it? Answer: They won’t create jobs.

      REASON 2: If you put people to work they will have money to spend and then and only then will those that have money to invest in creating products and services will create jobs to get some of the money that they have.

      REASON 3: Balance of natural economic. If all the money flows to the 1% and they don’t give it up then all the wealth in the rest of the country dries up and dies. Simply put, if the water in the mountains runs down into streams in which flows into rivers and eventually into the Oceans what replaces the water in the mountains? There needs to be something that takes some of the water in the form of clouds that brings it back to the mountains. If you break the cycle everything will wither and die.

    • Expect Better

      Tell all the lobbiest and the corporations they reporesent that they are next on the list by the general population!!!  Bring your best ideas but leave your damn checkbook at home. 
      And why won’t either party of our elected bodies put forth their own ethical standards and decline the money.  You can run a strong re-election campaign on the platform of taking “no special interest $” and the internet which is inexpensive.  The voters will support you in droves, but, if you preach it you better walk it.  Both parties are bought and paid for.  They can fix this or we will for them.  Otherwise they better start building a wall around Washington DC to protect themselves from the citizens of this country again.  Getting voted out of office might be the least of their problems.  Man there are some angry citizens out there.    

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/LDNDDS7QGXPHTENHFUF6M7ZJDA Patricia

      If we want any hope of having a democracy in the next few years…we MUST overturn Citizens United. Now what is happening is the rich are winning with many ads on t.v. and papers and the fight is not a fair one.  What will happen is that only those with a great deal of money can even apply….is that what we want for America?  America has always been fuled by some rich but mostly the middle class. With Citizen’s United, the middle class does not stand a chance and ordinary, good guys/gals will not be able to run for office.  The country will be controlled by the rich and we all know that would be a bad thing for any country.  We should let the two parties fight it out with words and campaigns not with who has the most money. Way ttoo much money is spent on campaigns …we could feed a nation with that money. What is happening in Wisconsin is disgraceful because 200,000 people signed a petition to get Scott Walker out and now because of the Koch Bros and Citizen’s United…the people will not get their way.  Mr. Walker continues to fudge employment figures even though the people know he is lying it cannot be proven until after the election and then it will be too late. Emergency Service people are also eroding the democracy in t his nation by pushing out duly elected people and replacing them with their own people with the power to close down schools, business’ radio stations and anything it deems necessary…kicking our eleclted officials…can you believe this?  Between these  two things, Emergency Service People (put in charge by the rich) and Citizen’s United ….our freedoms are vanishing and American is headed down a sorry path. 

    • Havasubob

      Time to end the NEW Guilded Age !

    • http://www.facebook.com/rhonda.carlson.79 Rhonda Carlson

      Republicans AND Democrats are behind this!  Please support McCain’s efforts. Not knowing the source of massive donations to our politicians is the surest way to lose our voice!

    • Billwieber

      Let’s get back to where the 99% have some political clout rather than the moneyed 1%.

    • Craig

      Since when is a balance sheet item speech?  This ruling is a textbook example of bad jurisprudence.  The ruling was absurd.  It did not uphold our right to free speech and national debate, but rather attacked it, by ruling that those with full pocketbooks and empty heads were allowed to drown out all other voices, as well as buy elections, legislation, and favors.  Speaking of buying elections, legislation, and favors, it couldn’t be possible to buy a ruling could it?  I didn’t think so, but this ruling is so painfully stupid I can’t rid myself of the question.  The words we speak or write, and the art we create, and the
      performances we give are considered speech and protected by the
      Constitution. 
      That said, we are not guaranteed the right to inflict our work on the Nation unless they choose to actively purchase our work or attend a performance.  I strongly object to Citizens United because its affect has been to channel obscene distortions of truth, outright lies, misrepresentations of fact, outright deceit, and other unwanted obscenities into my consciousness.  Just because it is political porn doesn’t make it ok.  The garbage generated by  the Citizens United Ruling should clearly be packaged with a Warning Label.  Something like this:  “This material is designed to deceive and mislead the viewer.  The authors are lying to you because the truth is damaging to their self interest, while be good for the viewers self interest.  The authors hope the viewer votes against his own best interest.”

    • Spokomojo

      One family appointed 3 of the 5 Justices who voted for this twisted decision, void of logic or decency.  Only a soiciopath could vote or even advocate for this defective, pond scum behavior.  Repeat ‘Citizens” and all of the established laws that permit our country to allow only the landed gentry to rule our country. 

    • Mojosail

      Up hill battle. The corporations and their lobbyists own our politicians. Lobbying (BRIBERY) should be ILLEGAL. 
       

    • Rand

      I’m a conservative, and I agree that all the big money from corporations and unions needs to be removed from out political process. Banks should not own our senate like they do, big money lobbyists should not be legally? commiting bribery, and the Koch brothers AND George Soros should not be allowed to create propaganda machines for their respective party. This is not a partisan matter. Repubs and dems politicians are both very guilty of this corruption of our political system. Every day citizens need to be able to debate the issues and come to our own conclusions without these multi-million dollar propaganda machines telling us what to think and telling us it’s ok what the corporations and unions and lobbyists want us to think.  

    • bomzin

      It’s not just citizen united but it is definitely something that needs to go.  The ruling simply ramped up a already existing problem. youtube search Boehner handing out checks. This was back in the 90′s and look who speaker of the house is now. Just goes to show what/where playing ball will get you.

    • ranbro

      Get money out of politics.

    • Bomewanu

      Absolutely horrifying. Exactly the same picture in the third world, only here, it is even more potent with the huge wealth. Where else do we run to if “the land of the free and hope of the brave” has degenerated to this? Horrifying.

    • DorothyBuchholz

      I hope that this will mean more of us will demand change.  Citizens United should not stand.

    • J Carter

      I am tired of the money game in politics. Please don’t let our government be decided by who has the most to spend. America can do better than this !!!

    • fedupwithcorporategreed

      I am still puzzled as to how anyone could possibly think that a corporation is a “person” with rights that belong to individuals.  While many corporations might be considered the personification of greed. they are NOT people!

    • Ellen McCullar

      We cannot endure this taking control of our elections. It is the most awful bill that I’ve seen in my lifetime of voting, and I am 83 years of age.

    • Gp89

       The mind set of Citizen’s United in a blight on America. Their selfish greedy actions are nothing short of treason. We are NOT for sale

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Mcgonigle/100000711787635 Mike Mcgonigle

      Never really been a McCain fan, but he has tried to keep the outbalanced issue of money out of electoral politics. We need real reform, and it will take more than two Senators, but this is a start.  Money has corrupted our democracy, and should be erased from the equation. We have the worst government that money can  buy.  Talk about “activist” judges!  

    • Sallyb251

      It’s wrong, and we must reverse it!

    • Daweldon

      Quite simply the most damaging ruling in 150 years . It should not take an amendment
      to the constitution .

      First – a group of ducks is not a duck . So corporations are not persons . They can outlive
      us – and are not subject to the same laws as persons . Indeed corporationhood is a legal
      gimmick to escape liability .

      As for spending money being a form of speech … uhhh … no …. we must draw the
      line on what is speech and what is unencombered action . Spending money indiscriminately
      and without accountability is an action . Not all action is speech . One can speak and speak
      and speak without spending money . And one can spend money without speaking . So money
      is not speech .  True money is useful for certain forms of speech . But as a handmaiden tool -
      it can be controlled by law without restraining speech .  If you tape a man’s mouth and tie
      his hands – yes that restrains speech .

      Please rescind this ruling — you have changed our democracy into a plutocracy .

    • Info

      Where’e the petition? I want to support this effort but am suspicious about immediate demands for my money. Is this the time for a “right-left” coalition? The right is currently launching a racist and xenophobic campaign against a decent President.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385135328 Syd Blackmarr

      I am one hundred percent behind the effort to put an immediate stop to Citizens United.  It has the potential to destroy our freedom to chose our own leaders, and ultimately, our Democratic way of life.  Let’s get behind McCain and Whitehouse to end this corrupt system with the passage of a Constitutional Amendment.  

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385135328 Syd Blackmarr

      I am fully behind McCain and Whitehouse in their effort to urge Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment to stop Citizens United NOW before this outrageous Supreme Court decision highjacks our freedom to elect our own leaders. Please join this effort to stop this corrupt practice now! 

    • http://twitter.com/Carol85719 Carol Jones

      Corporations buying politicians is the definition of corruption.

    • FreeMan

      If corporations are people and money is free speech who the hell do you think has the loudest voice when it comes to representation? How much money does it take to have your voice heard and your view represented?  http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/12739012/when-texas-executes-a-corporation

    • Marabill1

      I am so energized to think that there are members of Congress willing to encourage the Supreme Court to reconsider their unfortunate decision to give citizen power to corporations. It is ruining our government and thus our entire country with increased greed on one hand and increased destitution on the other. We are becoming like a third world country, with decreasing democracy.

    • Netonj

      If corporations are people where are their birth certificates?  They are not citizens and should be deported or thrown in jail.  They shouldn’t be allowed to vote without a picture ID.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Brinson/100000642401140 Diane Brinson

      I daresay that some of these justices were–I hope–among those of us protesting the Viet Nam war and the greed of big business.  Today, I daresay that some of those supporting Citizens United were among those suspicious of big business’s nearly 50 years ago. 

    • Evsteel

      You can’t buy my Vote……….

    • Tomadler1970

      Citizen United is ruining our Democracy
      We need to #GetMoneyOut immediately. 
      This is our Country “We The People” Not the Corporations 

    • Mary Alice

      I’m on social security and can’t donate as much to political groups.  Since it’s a govenrment agency deciding my poverty level, is that surpression of my voice?  After all, money is voice under Citizen’s United.  Who do i sue?

    • Yoda2937

      Get these greasy rat bast**d billionaires out of our politics. Must we prove it at the polls in 2012? Surely we will anyway. The problem that we have today is that we have unbridled global capitalism without global regulation. Because of this condition upheaval and tumult is on its way today and there is no way that I know of to prevent it. What is to come will be much more than a tempest in a teacup. Much, much more. I blame the lazy “investors” much, much more than I blame the so called welfare recipients in the world today. If revolution is necessary then this is what needs be.

    • prescrip

      When the voices of ordinary citizens is drowned by the few who can buy representation so unfairly, our democracy becomes diluted beyond recognition.

    • Kathy Bannerman

      Corporations are not people or citizens. As an entity, they can change their makeup (personnel, not mascara), they can continue after the “head” dies, and they can bundle the power of single individuals. These are all things that any single citizen cannot do and therefore, they should not be accorded the rights that belong to us as singular citizens. They have plenty of other ways to capitalize on their own special properties, but influencing our voting process so radically should not be one of them–it is wrong and will destroy our democracy.

    • MargeDC

      Yes, take the money out of campaigns by reducing the candidates’ biggest expense to zero. Make airtime free for every candidate. Broadcasters don’t own the airwaves, but hold them in trust for the American public. Rather than profiting from election cycles, broadcasters should put candidates on the air for free, as a public service. Running for office would cost less, politicians wouldn’t be for sale, and our government would represent more than just a few of us.

    • Myth1

      I’ve been waiting for this, Americans one and all finally have a platform to fight for our democracy. We can stop the small minority that want to corrupt the process with money and for money.

    • Lcol7

      CorporatePartisans United . F-R-A-U-D; BILKING the public are the goals..You are all FIRED. GET OUT! (We can always bring back riding you out of town on a rail…we need lots of rails.)

    • Alexfraser

      Citizens United is one of the worst decisions to have ever been reached by the Supreme Court of the United Court because it treads on the personnel liberties of the people.CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE! The individuals who work for corporatioua have individual liberty, but a corporation is only a bunch of words written by individuals and then granted legal standing by the citizens to operate as one kind of business.The Constitution does not grant the citizens or it’s elected representatives to give any type of a business individual liberty.

    • Joe Walker

      This is a terrible decision for the 99%, but great for the 1% cronies for whom you Supremes  are pimping!

    • Gbowman

      You have distorted our democracy with this disgraceful decision,and the use of no-profit is just a further disgrace. Fix the mistake now.

    • surewould

      You have changed the nature of democracy in a very negative way. Give the USA back to the people. 

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/V5UGS36SRPVRC333AZUO6XZI5A Bryan

      this is Gorilla dust. The legislature has the power to change election laws. Pettitioning the Supremes for redress in this climate is a joke. If you put a bill on the floor that makes all contributions transparent and either no caps or equal caps on alll that is a solution

    • Al Walskey

       The time is long overdue for Americans to exercise their Constitutional rights for a government truly “of, by and for the people” rather than the Plutocracy where money talks and BS walks.  As a Veteran I and my fellow Veterans did not risk our lives and spill our blood so that unpatriotic international business interests could sabotage Democracy.  We ARE part of the 99% who, when appropriate, feel responsible for upholding the motto “don’t treed on me.”

    • Wfschmidphd

      Stop the madness, cooperations are not people!

    • Mpmurphy

      This is the greatest threat to democracy and our Constitution in 150 years since the Civil WAR. THERE CAN BE NO MORE VITAL PROTECTION THAN REMOVING THE POWER OF CORPORATE MONEY TO CORRUPT THE ELECTION OF OUR LEADERSHIP.

    • Meeee

      i think that you are using the senators’ name to expand your mailing list. I was going to add my name to their list, not yours. 

    • Ron Mahon

      It’s great to see that there are two statesmen left in our Congress. In my opinion these are the only two members of Congress that these are reelection, without a vote for anybody but the rest of the incumbents.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alejandro-Moreno-S/554617392 Alejandro Moreno S.

      KILL CITIZENS UNITED NOW

    • Ranzen92

      Corporations are not people, Money is
      not free speech. The most corrupt Supreme Court in our lifetime.

    • Marie Mercer

      I’ve never felt so disenfranchised until the Supreme Court ruled in favor of corporations and big money.  I want my democracy back!

    • B_briemer

      RW corruption of our people’s government, especially via our courts and the Supreme Court has to be acknowledged.  And we’re now asking the perpetrators on the Supreme Court to reverse their crimes? 
      Wasn’t the outrageous ruling by the SC in 2000 putting W Bush in the White House enough to wake up anyone in America?
      Of course corporations aren’t citizens.  Of course, money is not free speech.
      There is only one way the RW can rise in America and that’s by political violence which we’ve suffered frequently over the last 50 years.
      That and stolen elections — and the wealth to buy assassinations and stolen elections and keep them covered up.

      WAKE UP, AMERICA — !!

    • Francis Tagbo

      Our representatives are supposed to be representing us and not those that can contribute to the largest amount to their campaign, Corporations are not people and have never been. At the rate this is going, by the end of this election cycle, our goverment will for the mega rich and by the mega rich.

    • Harvey Burnette

      Only the disgusting right wing portion of The Supreme Court has been bought just like the disgusting politicians that support them! MY DEMOCRACY IS NOT FOR SALE! Wake up people and use the power of your vote to get rid of all those CLOSET RACIST BIGOTS!! The Supreme Court gave us George W. Bush and you see how that turned out!

    • Jeff Morris

      Our Democracy and electoral process should not be for sale to the highest bidder. Unlimited non transparent campaign donations have our elected officials in the pockets of big Corporations and the super rich. Our Governmet no longer represents “We The People” but rather the special money interests. Washington now operates on a system of legalized bribery!

      Corporations are NOT people! End Corporate Rule! Abolish Corporate pesonhood! Restore Democracy in the U.S.A.!

    • V.Michael Sacco

      I forgive Mr Mc Cain for any gaffs during the past presidential election, and applaude him now as a rare and true American Statesman, as I previously believed.

      Thank you John!

      Thank you Senators McCain and Whitehouse for showing America how to govern!

    • Ginima2b

      Citizens United is an affront to our democracy and to our sensibilities for justice and fair play.  We have seen the damage the Super Pacs have done to undermine our political process.  The time to reverse Citizens United is NOW!

    • You Cant Take It With You

      Corporations DO have a voice: their OWNERS! We are the HUMAN citizens who can vote, donate to campaigns, and contact our elected officials if we don’t like the way our corporations are treated.
      As for alien shareholders, they will invest here if we Americans create the right environment, and withhold investment if not (market forces rule you know), but they do NOT get free speech in our elections process.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eileen-Quin-Gould/100001782794432 Eileen Quin-Gould

      I am 86 years old and have had a front row seat.   From where I sit, control of politics by the extremely wealthy has always been with us, going back to reading Abigain Adams and her time.   However, it has come to a CRISIS where we can no longer count on a fair two-party system but a Congress completely controlled by the money interests.

      I want the BEST not only for my children and other children but I want it for the survival of a great country that with all the good and all the blemishes, remains too wonderful not to save and revive the values and ethics that have sustained her…to this precipice.   Ordinary citizins, the bulwark of our democracy, are in DANGER.

    • Mike Bonvillain

      I do not understand how the Supreme Court could have ruled that a corporatipon or
      a SuperPac could give unlimited dollars to political campaigns and not even consider the fact that they expect political favors in return.
      Right now our entire Government is BROKEN!!!!!

    • Joeipy37

      i aim 74 the bush family has corrupted this country there should be a recall on the ballet including the supreme court i wont be her to much longer but you young ones will your in a fight for lives and your children they wont stop on tile you have to beg for a place to live and eat the use the church but there  e veal basters and use god to rune this country they have been working on this for a long time      joe in fl      

    • Elizabeth815

      Thank you, Senator McCain for being a most honorable man

    • Todd Sullivan

      In the beginning of our country,  the founders believed that representatives to Congress would be full-time citizens and very part-time politicians.  It’s time we reverse the trend and get back to our roots!  Full-time citizens don’t need to tak money handouts, they have their own businesses and incomes.

    • Alangilbert

      The results of this badly thought out experiment in government has already threatened the basis of our system of government; votes have become a subservient power to money and democracy itself is being threatened. 

    • billy carter jr

      NOW or never fellow americans!!!

    • Jdwii41

      This is beyond unreal—we all know it was done by the T-pukes and will not change until the ussc is changed to a Dem. one–gooopers love to be run by the ultra rich even if they are reduced to nothing!

    • SundownLF

      Not since the days of the robber barons has our democracy been so ‘for sale’ to the highest bidder, thanks in large part to the Citizens United decision.

      When corporations can be jailed and otherwise held accountable for the damage they do – up to and including execution – their money cannot be considered ‘free speech’ because it’s NOT free!

    • Mikey from Texas

      Who’s in or out, who moves the grand machine, Nor stirs my curiosity, or spleen; Secrets of State no more I wish to know. Than secret movements of a puppet-show; Let but the puppets move, I’ve my desire, Unseen the hand that guides the master wire.       …Churchill…

    • Paul Scheele

      We claim to be a democratic nation, which Lincoln well described as “government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”  But so long as individuals and organizations are able to spend unlimited amounts of money on elections and lobbying, that claim cannot be accurate.  Instead of a democracy, we have become a plutocracy, government of, by, and for the wealthy.

    • Kaelby

      This country was NOT founded on, by, or for wealthy aristocrats who wanted to get away from the poor who surrounded them.  Rather, it was founded by immigrants fleeing the oppression of wealthy aristocrats.  It grew up with a believe that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL and that does not mean corporations.  It means you, me, and the guy next door – individuals and the only way we can succeed as a democracy is to keep the meaning of EQUAL as an integral part of how we choose our leaders.

    • http://www.facebook.com/robert.newport.7 Robert Newport

      crony capitalism, corporate fascism, Big Government, Big Business….doesn’t much matter what it is called, it is and it is powerful but it cannot stand the light of day…  Dr.B

    • Tellis24

      Billionaires should not be allowed to buy our government.  Reverse this horrible decision now.

    • Chris Radant

      We’ve lost our way. Humanity has been mowed down by lust for money. One man, one vote. How many obvious ways can we put it? Don’t let billionaires take our votes or diminish their value! We’ve fought these wars to “bring democracy to ________(fill in the name of the oil-rich country here.) How about hanging onto our own democracy??

    • Lmartin

      If money can be received from an anonymous donor to further a political cause and therefore ultimately determine the course of American foreign policy, how can we be sure that the source of this funding is not coming from North Korea, or Iran, or Yemen, or from those who wish this nation no good will?  How could the Supreme Court  not have thought of this when they approved Citizens United and its philosophy?  Leo Martin

    • WD Vangieson

      Walter D. Van Gieson

      Please bring back the rights of the common man to have his vote count instead of the votes being bought by big business and foreign ciuntries. I fought for this country in WWII and I want that  my service and the service of my 40 million comrades that have served sin ce the minute men of the revolution should not be betrayed.

    • KLselfadv76

      Can’t sign. streamer interfering

    • carl scala

      what we need is a one, 6 year pres. term, funded by ”we the people”, not by ”we the motivated zillionairs..   a possible 2nd 6 year term but not consecutively… carl scala

    • Jane Ehrenberg

      I agree that it definately needs to be overturned.

    • Jay Joiner

      We must return the one-man-one-vote rule to power. If we continue to allow the wealthy to control OUR government via their wealth, we will sink into a semi-feudalistic system in which the majority will live at the pleasure of those who have the money to make “campaign contributions,” which, of course, is simply control by means of wealth.

    • Tomflow

      Get rid of this disgrace to American democracy and strength.  Return power to individuals and not to corporations and special interests.  Our goverment has not been for sale before and should not be now. 

    • Gtj

      Reverse the Citizens United Decision. NOW!

    • Derf

      A travesty of our democratic Republic. Financial power vs. individual citizen vote.

    • Maureen Kelley

      Citizens United GIVES this country away to corporations.  It denies the individual citizen the right to be heard, the right to participate in a democracy and it crushes our right to prevail over moneyed interests.  The individual American no longer mattes under Citizens United.  The United States of America is in deep, dire need of campaign finance reform. CU only serves to concentrate power in the hands of corporations and puts their interests above the tax-paying people of this country.  It’s patently illegal and should be overturned as soon as possible.

    • Calmcbr

      The  Supreme Court of the last 20 years has taken on the look and tone of a partisan group in support of the repubican party? This once beyond reproach aspect of our judical system, the very top of the pyramid, has fallen into a lesser light. The republican party is no longer for America’s citizens. It has become party first, then corporations (0ne & The same) and where we the citizens appear is a mystery? 

    • Rlscom1

      Campaign Finance Reform is the ONLY way to get your Congress back from the Lobbyists who control the Congressional agenda and Votes with their Campaign Cash . http://www.campaignfinancereforms.org
      Nothing else will work to finally bring social and economic justice and fairness to the 99%ers.

    • gyso

      limit contributions to any/all political individuals/groups to the amount of income tax paid by the donor in the year of the contribution.

    • Jerome Landau

      Business entities are not individuals and should not be treated as same.  They are created by a state and are not federal citizens.  To permit an entity to contribute as much money as it chooses to influence an election is to deprive each individual citizen of the United States of his or her vote… To limit the amount of money any individual may contribute to an election and concurrenlty permit an entity to contribute unlimited funds is to deprive each citizen of the value and quality of his or her vote.  Our Supreme Court Justices must be above any inkling of political bias – this is a country “of the people, for the people, by the people” – a corporate entity can be of, for and by one person – or one other entity – and yet the supreme Court has given that “one person or entity” the ability to outspend all American citizens combined; and we now see that this is what some are coming close to doing.

      Jerome Allan Landau  

    • Dwilliamsiii

      Justices… If you don’t undo this decision, history will recall it as one of the few most infamous, contrived, bizarre, anti-democtatic, un-constitional that contributed to the downward spiral of the middle class, destruction of the poor, and that created “a government of the (corporate) “people”…”by the (corporate) “people”…”for the (corporate) “people.” All this courts other decisions combined will be ignored by history.   

    • Ed

      We Americans who are alive now have a responsebilty to have Citizens United overturned to protect generations alive now and in the future from having a goverment who is bought and paid for by corporations and speciial interest groups. We must make sure there is a clear and transperent system in place so that all the people can see who is giving money to any political party. The system in place now is so ripe with coruption it is sickening. This I hope is the beginning of the end of the current system. Ed 

    • Bienestar

      Money is not speech- it’s a megaphone for speech.

    • John P. Falchi

      Citizens United is one U.S. Supreme Court Decision which, definitely, needs to be overturned!

    • jussmartenuf

      The Citizen United ruling by the 5 majority justices was a terrible unconstitutional decision designed to give corporations the ability to influence elections in their favor against the rights of the individual citizen. It is as bad as the Dred Scot decisions that discriminated against certain individuals and needs to be changed now. To wait for a constitutional amendment would allow injustice to prevail in the mean while.

    • Frwndsfrm

      It has always been that money talks and bullshit walks, until now. We changed the conversation through the Occupy movement; now we need to change how we elect our leadership. It’s time to get past the sound bites!

    • Upetralia

      with apologies to winston churchill:
      never have so few (9 judges) done so much to injure so many (300 + million USA population)
      alternatively,
      never have so few (9 judges) done so much to help so many (n=?? corporations)

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Smoker/100002016946909 Richard Smoker

      Our democracy for sale to the highest bidder? This abomination needs to stop. Citizens of all political parties and independents as well are opposed to this in majority percentages. This is not what the founding fathers intended for this country, and it is having a negative effect on all of us!

    • Roy Benstead

      Only registered voters should be allowed to contribute to the election process. 

    • Bosatsu

      The Supreme Court has turned into partisan politicians with life-long tenure and the last say in the rule of law… Isn’t that precisely what the founders sought to prevent with the judicial branch (supposedly) not aligned with or influenced by political parties…
      The Supreme court is rapidly becoming the obstacle to Democracy, and the enemy of the constitution…

    • Doclmd

      Finally, McCain is doing something sane and useful.

    • Gypsy_ms

      Citizens United is the worst ruling the Supreme Court has ever made.  It has created a political monster which must be overturned.

      • William Blischke

        I agree completely!  I am 72 years old, as a Ph.D. in Sociology from Cal and a college professor following changes in social class and politics for over 50 years, I have never seen a more anti-democratic decision!

    • Davidhughes595

      The politically motivated rulings of the supreme court are very quickly destroying democracy in this country.  As is the outrageous intrusion of religion in the political arena. Corporate greed should not be deciding who gets to serve in government. it is certainly no longer government for the people…it’s government against the people…and it has to stop.

    • Cchunt205

      The Citizens United ruling one of the worst rulings the Supreme Court has ever made! This ruling buries democracy, the rule of law, and the power of the vote. It is not part of the intention on the founding fathers, and it is unconstitutional. Perhaps this was the actual intent of the Supreme Court. Now money is speech, money takes the place of the rule of law, money takes the place of democracy, money takes the power of the vote. If the Supreme Court will not overturn their own decision, then we, the people of the United States have to overturn it or lose our vote, our democracy, and our republic.

    • http://www.WillieTandDoctorX.com/ Willie T

      Freedom of speech presumes the opportunity to have one’s
      voice heard.  Otherwise it is
      fairly useless.  The rise of the
      super PACs in the wake of the Citizens United v. FEC ruling creates a monstrous
      imbalance in our elections, leaving the vast majority of the population
      essentially voiceless.  Unless we
      amend the Constitution, powerful special interests will forever rule the media,
      saturating the airwaves with political advertising.  Only those with the deepest pockets can possibly hope to
      compete with them.  For those who
      claim an amendment will deprive corporations of their free speech rights, that
      argument hinges on a) whether you believe corporations are people, b) whether
      the Founders intended to extend constitutional rights to such entities, and c)
      whether money equals speech.  The
      14th Amendment clarifies the definition of  “citizenship”, and guarantees equal protection of
      the laws to all “persons.” 
      No other entities are mentioned.

       

      Corporations are legal fabrications chartered by the states,
      and as such, are subject to regulation. 
      Political advertising expenditures paid out of their general treasuries
      may more rightly be considered commercial transactions rather than instruments
      of speech.  It is not unreasonable
      to place limits on these transactions to prevent wholesale distortion of the
      electoral process.  That
      corporations are run by human beings does not make them people.  While the Constitution protects the
      rights of individuals who run corporations, there is nothing to suggest that
      these non-human entities are themselves so protected.  Corporations are not counted for apportionment of
      representatives in Congress, they cannot vote in elections, nor are they
      eligible to hold office.

       

      Many corporations are foreign-owned.  (ARAMCO, an oil refining company, is
      wholly owned by the Saudi Arabian government, and has operations in the United
      States, including a lobbying division in Washington DC.)  It is doubtful that the Founders
      intended for foreign entities to be able to influence the outcome of our elections
      by flooding our airwaves with political advertising.

       

      The Founders could perhaps have been
      clearer.  Instead, they left it to
      future generations to dispute, and for the Supreme Court to interpret their
      intent.  Two hundred, twenty-three
      years worth of jurisprudence has sought to clarify that intent.  When the Court’s interpretations are
      deemed injurious to the democratic process, the Constitution provides a
      powerful tool (under Article V) to amend the document.  This has been done twenty-six times in
      our history.  It is time to do it
      again.

    • Elaine Hinman-Sweeney

      Big money drowns out most individuals’ ability to make any input to (what remains of) our democracy.  Our main stream media is often owned by the very entities funneling huge amounts of money into politics.  Once it comes time to vote, most individuals have been bombarded by media and paid advertizements so long that it can be hard to suss out the truth on any matter.  

    • SM

      Return citizen power to have his vote count. Reverse Citizens United which allows unlimited persuasion by big business and previously US corporations now based in foreign countries.

    • Gil Miranda

      Citizens United ruling is an egregious example of Corporate state judicial activism which leads to massive violation of the First Amendment of the American People.  In itself it is an indictment of the partisanship of the present majority in the U.S. Supreme Court.

    • Fathertomcampbell

      Please make me proud of our judiciary system again by reversing “Citizens United v FEC” . I have taught history and political science all my life and I would like to think our supreme court has the courage to reverse an obvious miscarriage of justice which has led to the ruination of our political system by the horrible abuses “Citizens United” brought to campaign financing.

    • Elong

      Congratulations to McCain and everyone else who is fighting the Citizens’ United decision — one of the most egregious anti-democracy moves in my long life.  We need the voices of our citizens, not our corporations, to count!  

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZL7GM67I6SJ5IVK3HIGPPP5C7Q DonJoseM

      It’s very shameful, that the Supreme Court, has allowed themselves to be a puppet of big corporations. This Citizen United, is nothing less than a ticket for corporation to buy the electoral system. Common sense tells me, this is not right, not for the people and not for the country. It needs to be reversed, before its too late. 

    • Brauninger

      Corporations are not people.  It is that simple and very obvious to everyone.  This decision by our Supreme Court deserves to be overturned by amendment or if possible by Congress.  Perhaps our populace could forgive our senators and representatives the nonsense they have deluged us all with for so long if they wised up and did something for the country.  True patriotism is the willingness to put country ahead of self.  Accumulating wealth will never be enough; serving one another is the true payoff.  We are all better off when we are all better off.  Read The Gardens of Democracy by Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer and improve your ability to speak what is in your heart.

    • Mary Coleman

      You need to reverse CITIZENS UNITED. It was a terrible mistake. Our Democracy should NOT be sold to the highest bidder!

    • yodadog

      I was astounded when this ruling was handed down! Until that moment, I felt that the SCOTUS was the only remaining uncorrupted and not sold out to corporate interests branch of government. Obviously our government is completely under the interests of corporate America with a fly in the face of the constitution ruling like that. Reverse this ruling and restore some legitimacy to yourselves and your offices.

    • Alexander Meller

      If the Citizens United Ruling is not undone or revisited we are going to have democracy in name only.  The current decision supports vasts inflows of money that can not just influence but decide the outcome of elections, without being constrained by the facts, or truth, or rules limiting what a candidate can say.  The result is going to be the best government money can buy.

    • Mickeynow

      The country needs to be returned to real, live people. Corporations are not people and do not care for real, live people. 

    • Nanhaf

      This is the most activist court of my lifetime: as per the recent article in the New Yorker, while the Court could have simply commented on the case, Chief Justice Roberts used it as a means to promote his conservative agenda – corporations can now “buy” our democracy. It is shameful, partisan, and should be overturned. 

    • http://ericshlapack.com/ Eric Shlapack

      The most irresponsible political action to happen in the last decade is not what one would think.  It was the shortsighted, ideologically and politically driven decision to allow for unlimited special interest money to infiltrate our political system.  It is embarrassing to think a group of individuals as intelligent as those of you on the Supreme Court allowed this travesty to occur, despite the clear problem with lobbying and the revolving congressional door that have so crippled our legislative process.  Those of you who voted in favor of Citizens United are going to be the downfall of Western Civilization as we know it, creating a permannet underclass, because elections are now an auction, not a choice.  Great job Supreme Court, you are the most embarrassing members of the United States, behind Congress.

    • Buzz

      You can see the damage done to America by Citizens United every night on the TV.  Reverse it, change it, amend the constitution—whatever can be done to correct this misguided decisions. 

    • Ed E.

      It’s 
      “government of the people, by the people, for the people”.  
      Corporations are not people!!

    • Herrlugus

      Using some elses quote as inspiration I will only ‘believe that corporations are people when the state of Texas executes one’!
      Karl

    • James Moulton

      It is useful for corporations and other institutional types to have a legal entity, but they are definitely NOT people. They have no unique incontrovertible corporeal presence. For example, you cannot put one in jail, pin a medal on one, or kill one.

    • Bert Hill

      Gentlemen, how can you possibly rule that corporations have the same rights as citizens?  There is no mention of companies, associations, or corporations in the constitution.   Your recent ruling will have the effect of a complete and total take over of our country by the rich and it is already pretty bad.  How about you support the the “people” who the constitution mentions many, many times?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1285996341 Patricia Dixon

      When money corrupts it is time to get rid of money.  Citizens United must be repealed if we are to preserve the American Dream. We must create a social order that benefits all citizens, getting rid of unfair advantages in our electoral system and reclaiming government by the people and for the people.

    • B E Murphy

      Growing up, I always believed that the Supreme Court was the epitome of justice and the laws.  Citizens United is a joke and makes a mockery of a so-called democracy.  Corporations are not people and never will be.  At any rate, with Citizens United, the election process has been turned into a lottery.  End this dreadful decision and return us to the rule of law!

    • Appleval

      One of the foundations of our democracy is the power of the individual.  This decision has effectively taken away the power of the people and turned over the decision making power to a very few, very rich, individuals who have their own self-interest at heart.  How can my $25.00 individual donation stand against someone who shovels millions into the coffers of whoever agrees to their wishes?  We have lost our voice.

    • garnet

      President Obama warned SCOTUS (they sat in his face and shook their heads “no” remember?) and the American public that this would happen. Ex Senator Feingold, (here in our state of Wisconsin) is also still working to reverse this insane ruling.  It’s time for the Court to man/woman up and admit to the fiasco they have created.  FIX IT NOW!!!

    • Maggie

      This is nothing more than free rein letting corporations purchase government seats!  This is a way for the Justices, like Chief Justice Roberts, to exploit the legal system for his own agenda and gain!  The public has had enough!  We, the people, cannot compete with corporate money, and that is NOT HOW OUR DEMOCRACY IS MEANT TO WORK!  Shame on the Supreme Court!  You have sold out the public for your own greedy agendas!  AND corporations are funding this for you!  We want our country and our voices in government returned to us!

    • Joed

      The Roberts court is a disgrace and citizens united is a disgraceful display of arrogance towards the hard working middle class voters of this country.

    • Wor101

      By equating the spending of money with free speech, the Court has granted corporations and the rich an overbearing voice in our democracy drowning out that the majority of citizens this government is supposed to represent.

    • Caligirl

      The citizens United ruling allows a handful of the wealthy, no matter American or foreign, to buy our elections right down to local, state and federal levels.  If the Supreme Court is truly, as it was framed to be, non political, they should listen to the will of the American people and take action to overturn this law before November national elections.  Let the candidates be the ones to speak for themselves so that citizens can make their own decisions without their information being colored by the hundreds of millions of dollars given by so few in an attempt to drive public opinion.  This decision by our Supreme Court was a terrible mistake!

    • Nazani14

      Let’s stop the need for huge campaign funding by banning all TV and radio ads.  Let the candidates make their views known through speeches, interviews and published platforms.  One-minute ads don’t convey any useful information.

    • slee

      I am losing faith in our democracy. Free Speech should be a right and a privilege of the individual and not something that should be measure-able in dollars that make one voice louder than another–so we all have a relatively equal voice. Only groups of individual citizens with shared interests making reasonably small contributions together should come together to have a collective voice–not one company or person with a fortune allowed to sway public opinion to benefit their private interests. However, this is not likely a viable solution given the recent Supreme Court Decision. So, before we can vote to change the court and congress and whitehouse to represent us again we need four things to get our country back. First, public funding only for all elections and shorter election cycles relative to the level of office. This way the people we elect will have time and motivation to serve all public interests again. Second all media outlets must get out of the business of paid political advertising–as part of their license access to air they must provide equal time for local, state, and national candidates and issues only during set election cycles. That way they will have time to go back to reporting between cycles on what the government is actually doing. Third, universal mail-in ballots for all (like Oregon) and universal secure/accessible voter registration at banks and other institutions that require ID, grandfathering in long time residents have been registered voters born without documentation. Fourth, representative voter districts need to be determined by demographic science and not political agents.

    • Julie Osborn

      Citizens United must be reversed or this country will no longer be a democracy because the corporations and big money will own the United States.  No longer will be about “We the People”, instead it will be about “We the Big Money”.  If you justices want to be the ones that cost this country it’s democratic status, keep on with Citizens United.  The United State will no longer be a “Government of the people, by the people, for the people” as Abraham Lincoln stated.  Instead it will be a plutocracy or a oligarchy and the democratic process will fail.  What were you thinking?  Your decision sells our country to the highest bidder and is the greatest threat to the United States since the Civil War!

    • Lindamchurch

      I have been involved in local, state and national politics thru my family for 70 years. Have raised 12 children to be active, responsible citizens.  Citizens United is the most disappointing decision ever to be handed down by the SCOTUS.  Please redeem our justice system by reversing this decision.

    • Gloria Davis

      Your decision has destroyed our democracy and is a threat to our society. Citizens United must be repealed. Corporations only have their interests at heart in this decision. I sometimes why those who supported this decision should not be impeached.

    • Ellis Patti

      Citizens United was a blatant selling off of the American political process and office, was 100% predictable, and should serve as demonstrable proof that The Supreme Court has NOT, by any means, exercised supreme conscience.
      Impeachment is in order.

    • steve

      The only hope for our democracy was campaign finance reform . This was painfully obvious even before this monstrous Citizens United decision. Citizens United is like treating a sick man by giving him poison .

    • balance10

      If a corporation is a person . . . why does it not have a limit of $2300 per political election the same as a flesh and blood person?

    • Jo Greenwald

      For decades we have watched our democracy eroded as money has become more and more of a disproportionate influence on public policy, while our votes have earned less and less of a voice.  It should be obvious to anyone who really cares about American democracy, that Citizens United would have a disastrously damaging effect on our democratic process.  Maybe that was the point – to further increase the influence of the wealthy and powerful over the preferred policies of the electorate. But if I am wrong, and I hope that I am, it is time to reconsider.  The claim that this ruling wouldn’t erode democracy has proven to be wrong.  If your intention is to defend the constitutional democracy that we all hold dear, this grand experiment in history….to see her thrive and survive, overturning Citizens United is the first step…and the step that only you can take.  Thank you for your consideration.

    • Jlweber2

      This is going to be the most devided election this country has ever seen.  We can thank the Roberts court for the worst political atmosphere and the fact that the American people on either side of the political spectrum gained NOTHING but corporations have now become breathing humans and can futher corrupt our democratic system.  History will show your court made a terrible error and should be overturned. 

    • Lenny Fromm

      Citizens United….Creates a Huge CONFLICT of INTEREST that makes much of the nasty dark side of politics even more possible then ever before…it gives the wealthiest in our society, the opportunity to abuse the system under the protection of the law…this must be changed…..Lenny

    • Fritz

      I personally don’t give a damm Mr. Roberts what you think.  Corporations are not people and money is not speach.  What you have done is to damage democracy in this country more than virtually any other government oficial ever.  Only people eligable to vote for a candidate should be alowed to give money to that candidate and that should be drastically limited to provid everyone an equal voice as to how this country will operate.  Reverse your Citizens United rueling or one of these days somebod just may through your potted palm off your balcony in memory of the other Mr. Roberts.

    • Pete Binkley

      Put the power of the electorate back in the hands of the voting public! Not in the control of those with most money.

    • Michael Cannon

      One of the most important roles of the Supreme Court is ensure
      the “gift” of democracy that we inherited from our founding fathers is safe and
      secure for future generations. The threat of corporatocracy to our republic was
      well understood by our founders. They understood companies are not people — that
      companies have privileges and citizens have rights.

       

      Please stay true to our founding principles and overturn
      Citizens United. Your kids and grandkids will be grateful for “keeping the gift
      alive”, and for your ability to admit a mistake and fix it.

    • Girlhowdy

      I don’t usually have tea party tendencies, but I truly feel that Citizens United has made it impossible for me to be represented. I’m now taxed without representation, laws are passed regarding my rights without representation, I could go on and on. I simply don’t have the money to buy the representation that is now allowed for corporations and others due to Citizens United. I remain astonished that the Supreme Court acted this way. I feel like America as I knew it (or thought I knew it) went down the drain that day.

    • S Rocha

      If you as a Court are unable to see the destruction to our democracy you have caused with this decision; then resign and get out of the way of the PEOPLE!  YOU have a job to do for US; not for just the few!  Stop the exploitation of our system.  Stop the partisan politics and DO YOUR JOB FOR THIS COUNTY’S GREATER GOOD.

    • Patricia Cherry

      This court has so obviously been politically biased that I feel we should research cause for impeachment. I honor and respect this part of government, but you have  over stepped your authority.  Citizens United was originally a narrow question in front of the court and you seem to have broadened it so that you now have secured corporations dominion over the people.  Your reputations have been tarnished so that millions of us no longer trust you.  If we can not trust the judicial system where will that leave us?   It appears that you have wrangled and twisted the law to benefit corporations at the expense of real people.  Real people who are bordering on serious revolt.   Do you not understand the political process?  Did you not understand how you have handed corporations carte blanche to buy our government?  This must be overturned.  Impeachment is not out of the question.

      • Nnnooccc

        “Impeachment is not out of the question.  And, history has proven time and again the revolt is always an option.

    • Ceceliacopeland

      I use to think the Supreme Court was a Honor.  I believe they have been bought & paid for & we the people will suffer for it. Thanks John McCain for your support on this matter.

    • Leomcdevitt

      Corporations are NOT citizens, they are global entities, beholden to no country. That is why we can’t allow corporations to have same rights as an American citizen. As a citizen, my fate is tied to the fate of my country. A corporation can just pick up and move when things go down the tubes. Corporations are responsible only to their shareholders.

    • Vm1239

      I am deeply disturbed by the ourageous things which are croppng up all over the United States- voter suppression laws, the horrendous treatment of our President by the lunatic fringe, the attempts to destroy unions by governors so far right that they”re about to fall off the grid.  But nothing offends me more than the absurd Citizns’ United ruling by the Supreme Court.  From my earliest days in school I was taught to take my citizenship seriously.  And I do.  I firmly believe in the concept of one man – one vote.  I reject out of hand the idea that a corporation is a person.  It is absurd on its face.  All that the Court has done is to unleash all the “entepreneurs” who want to ensure that their agendas prevail.  It goes without saying that their money can buy anything, including Senators, Representatives, even Presidents.  We have a Congress overflowing  with their serfs right now.  It is my opinion that the Court has severely dishonored all the men and women who preceded them in that instution.  And they have opened themselves up to charges that they are not an impartial body but the final joke on America.  

    • Greg Kimber

      It boggles my mind that the Supreme Court, an un-elected body can take such a radically activist stance and change the way our political system works, undermining the democracy our country was originally based on.

    • grannysam

      I think they should impeach each and everyone of you and reverse this ruling you  foolish people have made. This is not they way our country was meant to be ran. The rich get richer climbing up on the backs of the old, sick and poor. redeem yourselves now and   stop pretending corporations are peope

    • Ptploog

      How can we allow a Supreme Court ruling to undermine the very foundation of our democracy.  We expect the Supreme Court to uphold the concept that every citizen who has a heart and breathes deserves equal protection and equal opportunity under the law.  Corporations are not people in any real sense of the word.  Citizens United, fully realized, transfers power from “we the people” to corporations.  Citizens v United is destroying our precious democracy.  The idea of one man, one vote is rendered completely meaningless by the obscene influence of money in our elections and on our elected representatives.  Corporations are only obligated to make money for their shareholders.  Someone once said, “What’s good for general motors, is good for the country” but there is much more to America than the “bottom line”.  The decision should be overturned by amendment or the court’s own action in order to preserve our democracy.  It is shameful that we have such a partisan court.

      • Nnnooccc

        Unfortunately, we have ALLOWED the Supreme Court ruling.  Why did we do that?  And, what to do about allowing it.  Impeachment of the justices?  Can be done.

    • http://www.facebook.com/james.howard.9883 James Howard

      The US Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United case was shameful, and it highlighted in stark terms the central failing of our entire capitalist system.  It exacerbates the condition of the the rich oppressing the poor.  The fact that our Supreme Court sanctioned this status quo is clear proof that the judicial system is equally as corrupt as the legislative and executive systems.  If you want the US government to maintain any pretense of legitimacy in the eyes of its citizenry, Citizens United must be reversed.

    • Sam McPherson

      The Citizens United decision has been the biggest blow to preservation of our democracy since the United States Constitution was written. It is ludicrous to describe a corporation as a person, with all the rights to participate in influencing elections with their money and power. Corporations cannot cast votes as any qualified citizen can. They can only seek to buy influence with the people they support for office to sway the democratic process to their advantage. Please remove this impediment to democracy your decision has created. Recall the landmark decision on reapportionment from Tennessee citizens insisting that equity demanded that the ”One Man, One Vote” principle should apply in all elections. A corporation is not a human being and thus deserves no vote regarding those who serve in political office and enact, administer or ajudicate the law. 

    • Jerry Omalley

      This politically appointed and politically driven court is destroying the credibility of the Supreme Court. Activist judges? I would say so. The Republicans have modeled the court into the extreme right wing tool that we see today. They refuse to approve President Obama’s choices for judges in the lower courts. Over time our legal system will be run by Tea Party-approved judges and then the country is screwed. The disgraceful Citizens United ruling is just a preview of what the right wing judiciary can do to our country.

      • Nnnooccc

        It seems to me that this country is being run by everyone and entities, but it’s citizens.

    • Archeopteryx

      The SCOTUS ruling in Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific
      Railroad in 1886 was a severe blow to representative government. It was absurd
      to grant the constitutional rights of persons to legal fictions that are
      designed to shield the individuals who own and operate them from legal
      responsibility for their actions. Citizens United vs. FEC, in combination with
      this past ruling, is simply the END of representative government. Like any
      large organism, the United States may take a while to die, but we’re seeing the
      death spasms even now. Unless Citizens United is overturned, or
      constitutionally nullified, the great experiment begun back in the 1770’s is
      over, and the Roberts Court will live in INFAMY as the corrupt body that killed
      it.
       

    • Marydurney

      I have never been more discouraged about the state of our Country and our democracy since the advent of Citizen’s United.
      I feel deeply embarrassed to be an American now. It is the first time in my life I have considered moving to another country and would if I could afford to.
      It was all ready bad enough with the super rich buying the entire media and warping the news and information, keeping the general public uneducated and mislead. It was bad enough to have so much money already driving our election process. Now it is more than just over the top polluted.
      We have truly lost our democracy and might as well be back in the feudal times of King’s and Queen’s who ruthlessly controlled the lives of their people.
      It is a sad day for these United States and this must be reversed now and then we will still have a long way to go to restore our county to one which represents the people.
      I expect that all the gains we have made in the last 75 years to better the lives of the people and protect the environment will be lost as monied interest strip the country of all our social programs and environmental protections. Not only are we no longer leading the free world we are setting an example of a country which has destroyed itself from the inside with the Court that was put in place to protect the citizens.

    • Adamjnk

      I strongly urge the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision in Citizens United. This ruling is likely to go down in history as one of the Court’s worst decisions. It will most certainly invite corruption. For the sake of our survival as a democracy, please reverse this ruling and allow the people to have a fighting chance to make their voices heard without being drowned out by unlimited corporate spending.

    • jen in pa

      It seems that our democracy is now a plutocracy.  Those with the most money can now buy the candidate of their choice.  Where is the power of the single vote by an ordinary citizen?  There is no transparency to verify the donors of these huge sums.  Questionable political advertisements repeated thousands of times become “true” and they do sway elections.

    • Garry Ford

      The Citizens United decision stands out as possibly the most ill advised ruling to ever come out of the Supreme Court. It goes against the interest of our citizenry and reeks of political self interest. It saddens me to think that the majority who endorsed this ruling does not see the harmful impact that it has had on our country. I have never witnessed a more partisan display of power than the ruling rendered by these five Justices. Surely, they cannot truly justify this ruling in their own minds and if they can, they should  not be serving on the Supreme Court.

    • Rdyden

      A corporation is an organization of individuals who may number from a few to hundreds of thousands.  Citizens United, by defining corporation as an individual, is allowing one or a few people who run the organization to make a political statement on behalf of all it’s workers and investors.  The majority of these individuals may not even agree with the statement being made.  How is this different from a union.  In a union all members are contributing a portion of their personal assets to the union.  Union management is elected democratically and represent the majority of the members.  In the case of corporations, the investors and workers who make possible corporate profit do not have to approve nor are they even necessarily informed of the political statement, in the form of money, that the executives are making.  The overall effect of this is the ruination of our democracy. Corporate executives are able to make political statement in the form of financial contributions that unwillingly represent hundred, thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of individuals.

    • Tim

      How can it not be seen that money has corrupted the political process. All who are qualified to run for any office should
      have equal access to the media. No more, no less. I would go so far as to say that access should be awarded to each candidate
      equally and FREE with the total time capped. The cost of elections should be covered by a centralized pool of funds.
      The corrupting influence- money, must be mitigated or removed totally somehow.

    • Lvega3

      Democracy must never be determined by the “highest bidder”.
      Shame on us all for allowing this travisty. It must be overturned.
      The people have spoken.

    • Dmoore268

      The Roberts court knew exactly what it was doing when it passed citizens united. Conservatives believe that oligarchy is the best form of rule for our country, and this legislation facilitates it. After only 2 or 3 more election cycles citizens united will have taken full effect. Corporations will have taken full control of what’s left of the government. There will be a permanent slave class that is unable to stand up for any rights they have left because their lives are totally dependant on the corporation that gives them just enough to stay alive. That is, unless there’s a peasant revolt first.

      • NC Linda

        Well said and right on…..

      • nnocc

        I believe that unless we regain control of the government there will be no other recourse but to revolt.

    • Andria

      I am saddened by the choice of the Supreme Court Justices who pretend to have the country’s best interest at heart and mind, however are truly enslaved themselves to the corporations and lobbyists who pay for you’re power and greed.  I would hope that someday, hopefully before it is too late, that you will come to understand that the intentions of a few are not for the good of the people but only for themselves.  Will you choose to wear that scarlett letter for eternity? I ask you to consider the immense damage that has been assaulted upon the people of this country, namely by your own doing, and make the change that is desperately needed to help keep this country solvent.  Otherwise, we are doomed to repeat history of Empire’s before us.

    • Mstpeter01

      Money is not speech.  It’s property.
      Corporations don’t vote.
      Corporations don’t have birth certificates.

      THEREFORE, THE CITIZENS UNITED RULING IS INVALID.

    • richeeee

      One man one vote. When was the last time a corporation pulled the lever in a voting booth? No matter what the misguided Supreme Court says, corporations are not people. Do they breathe? Are they born and do they die? Of course not. So, how can anyone label them people. This has put our country and Government up for bidding to the highest bidder who wants access for their own agenda. There is no transparency or disclosure and it opens the door to the very wealthy or foreigners buying America.  We have a Court that is flavored by ideologues. Until there are term limits for Congress we will suffer long term occupants of our Government who are only concerned with feathering their nests and then move on tho the wonderful world of “lobbying” Also, an occupation that has no place in a democracy. When ever a populace is comprised of haves and have nots history shows the emergence of revolution. We must take our country back via the ballot box before there is anarchy.

    • Giuseppe Gianino

      I do believe that the Citizens United ruling is in favor of the self-interests of big business & corporations. That is a reflection on the Supreme Court itself that is supposed to show fairness to the people of this country.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=528706193 Ken Fulton

      “CORPORATION: an association of individuals, created by law or under authority of law, having a continuous existence independent of the existences of its members, and powers and liabilities distinct from those of its members.” That is the dictionary.com definition of the word corporation. It is not an individual but an ASSOCIATION of individuals. Each individual of that corporation still has the right to vote how they like, to say what they like and to think what they like. So the whole “infinging upon the first amendment rights” becomes moot.  If the corporation is considered a “person” (1.a human being, whether man, woman, or child. 2.a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.) which by the first 2 definitions, again quoting dictionary.com, seems literally IMPOSSIBLE, but for the sake of argument lets assume it is, then why aren’t they regulated the same way as an individual who declares bankruptcy. Why are they not held accountable in the same way an individual or person is?

      What’s the old saying? Ya can’t have it both ways?

    • Thea Kelley

      The idea that political contributions of money are entitled to the protection of the First Amendment is absurd, and toxic to democracy. This is really stretching the First Amendment so far as to violate its intended purpose, the protection of democracy by preserving dialogue. It is crucial that this decision be overturned.

      I couldn’t believe my ears when I heard about the Citizens United Decision. I was appalled. It just doesn’t make sense.

    • Mttown

      Please consider reversing the Citizens United decision.  It is clear as day the effect that this ruling is having in the Presidential campaign now underway.  Allowing the use of SuperPacs is an invitation to corruption and will further degrade our democratic institutions. The case in the Montana court system is a perfect opportunity to put an end to Citizens United. 

    • Dale K

      If money equals free speech, doesn’t this mean that wealthy factions have a BIGGER VOICE in government? And if so, isn’t this anti-democracy?
      If a corporation has all the rights of a citizen, does it also have all the responsibilities? Corporations are people? No, corporations are PAPER, my friend! CEOs, workers, clients, shareholders, are people – natural persons.

    • JudyO

      The best quote I’ve heard on this subject (and I’d give the author credit if I could remember who said it) is “I’ll believe corporations are people as soon as Texas executes one”.
      Think about it!
      You got it wrong and I urge you to overturn your terrible Citizen’s United decision.

    • Billcontreras

      We the People! What part, of We the People, do corporations get to annex? You the Supreme court injected this into our discord, NO president ever asked for it, NO legislature ever asked for it, NO voter ever asked for it. You, and you alone pushed this! You should be ashamed, if I had my way you would be impeached! You have done more harm to this great country then any treasonous act ever perpetrated against We the People.   

    • Chestand

      Citizen United has swayed the rights of ordinary citizen in favor of the well off with unlimited monies.  I am sure this is not what the founding fathers had in mind.  The unlimited funds that come from these corporation is just another form of bribery.  They can give unlimited amounts yet are held accountable by no one.   We the people are responsible to our country, we can be arrested and put in prison but a corporation cannot.   The funds come from who know who and many are probably coming from foreign countries.  You must see what this is doing to our country!  This kind of influence is not buying fairness it buying our elections and it is not in the best interest of the people of this country.  Please rethink this decision!

    • Elise from Arizona

      I have always had great respect for the Court and its members.   It makes no sense to me why such a highly respected group of men and women would vote in favor of Citizens United.    What did you think would happen?  Did you really think that corporations would play nice? 

      I can’t help but wonder who influenced you regarding Citizens United.  Certainly not the citizens!   Gee, it must have been the big corporations.

      If the big corporations want to throw away money I can think of many useful ways to spend it: educate laid off workers so they can return to work; help people stay in their homes; keep women and children safe….should I go on?

      Do the right thing.  Be accountable for this grave error in judgement and reverse Citizens United.

    • Gene Stubbs

      I think the Supreme Court’s Citizens United Decision gives unfair weight to the extremely wealthy and taking away the power of one man, one vote.  Billionaire’s can easily have the power to influence decision making.  I don’t think money should be equated to free speech.  Those with money now have undue influence on elected officials making the middle class and the lower class irrelevant, which is not what a democracy should represent.  A simple majority is the most democratic solution.  Those who can unlimited amounts of money have undue influence.  I believe that the Citizens United decision should be reversed. 

    • Bozo

      The right of Free Speech is granted to people, not anonymous donors.

    • Enigmaadu

      I have been a voter every since I became of age and I am now 56. I am an ardent student of history.
      I can never remember a time that there was less confidence in the one institution in this country that there is supposed to be ultimate confidence in.
      Your court has issued some of the most irresponsible decisions in some 200 years of Jurisprudence. You have disgraced yourself and with you the honor and reputation of this country and will be remember in to eternal destiny as one of the most misguided courts in the History of these United States. The decision of Citizens United is an abomination. Easily the worst decision ever handed down. That is a record I would not be proud of were I you. “handed down” Hear the words. You have clearly forgotten the office you hold collectively and the weight it carries. Please try and remember what is at stake. The very survival of our union is at risk. Time was that the court would have been embarrassed beyond the concept of the word to have been beholding to any one group as you so clearly are. It is abundantly apparent that this court is surely seems to be bought and paid for to all but the most blind. You are clearly out of touch with the real meaning of the US Constitution and clearly in direct conflict of the wishes of the authors of the documents and ideas you have sworn to uphold.
      Have you no shame or loyalty to the founding fathers much less the good people of this country??? Democracy should not be for sale. Citizens United has clearly put it up for action like a failed farm to the highest bidder. Truly a sad state for the greatest country in the world! Unless you change it this will be your legacy. Largely the only thing you will be remembered for unless you act to correct you obvious mistake. Please reaffirm the confidence we as a people should hold of the highest court in the land and overturn Citizens United if not for the country but for how history will surely judge you and those who believe in the country you are sworn to defend and protect and the court we all hope to again have such high regard for.
      Please remove this embarrassment from your record. Salvage what is left of yours and our collective worth as a country.

    • TRussert

      Democracy. That’s dictated by the will of the MAJORITY of people, not corporations. The only thing Supreme about you ruling is your IGNORANCE and AUDACITY. Just more 1% indentured servants.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Harry-Trimble/100002067257348 Harry Trimble

      Let’s get the “BIG MONEY” out of these elections.  It is a disgrace that about 200 billionaires and/or millionaires are allowed to “buy” politicians and control our elections. A corporation IS NOT A PERSON. The judges that voted for this should be kicked out of the Supreme Court. Super Pacs should be made to disclose their donors and limits should be set as to how much money one person can give both to a super pac or an individual donation. Corporations should not be allowed to give money to a Super Pac. Corruption and bad politics can destroy this nation — IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILTY TO RIGHT THIS WRONG. By the SCOTUS ruling of saying a corporation is an indvidual, the SCOTUS created a large part of this problem.   YOU NEED TO RIGHT THIS WRONG.

    • Walter Simmons

      The Citizens United decision effectively transformed our government from a democracy to a plutocracy–i.e., government by the wealthy. This is fundamentally unpatriotic as it violates the principles upon which our country was formed. Government BY the wealthy means government FOR the wealthy–i.e., what has become known as “the 1%.” That is, the wealthy BRIBE our representatives to make decisions that benefit only the 1%, while jeopardizing the health, the safety, and the well-being of the 99%. This is “class warfare,” i.e., the 1% have declared war on the 99%, and they are getting away with it. Citizens United MUST be reversed, or the USA will have forfeited its stature as the symbol of the “free world.” 

    • Susanrepa

      Corporations are not people/citizens.  Corporations created because of “Citizens United” should NOT have the privilege of calling themselves “non-profit”.  To allow any person, from any country, to contribute thousands, even millions of dollars without the voting public knowing their names is wrong.  I ask that “Citizens United” decision be reversed.

    • Archeopteryx

       Dear Judge Roberts,

      Thank you! I inherited $500,000,000 from dear old dad when he passed his oil fortune on to me, and it’s nice to know that AT BIRTH, I had five hundred million times the free speech rights as my fellow citizens who, to their eternal shame, inherited nothing of any monetary value from their parents. I feel privileged indeed, and now that you have put our government up for sale, I’m going shopping!

    • Spiritus2b

      These so-called “Elections” being to close to call over the last decade or so with the “margin of error. Very suspicious to me. I  believe in what the great George Carlin said. “People believe they have a choice” “They have no choice” “They have owner’s” “THEY OWN YOU”…

    • M_damri86

      History will remember the Roberts Court as the court that destroyed American Democracy.  This is the Court’s opportunity to change such an outcome.

    • http://twitter.com/MattSTKC MattSTKC

      Corporations are not people. Even if they are there are contribution limits for individuals. This is just a way to let rich people buy the government they want. Stop this nonsense.

    • Rick Bligh

      No entity, other than a living, breathing human being, should be afforded all of the rights of individuals as laid out in the Constitution and its amendments.  Corporations and other organizations should have only those rights that allow them to participate fully in economic markets and social interactions.  But, involvement in our governance and politics should be reserved for the people.  As President Lincoln famously said: “…government of the people, by the people, for the people…”.  This is the standard we expect the Supreme Court of the United States to adhere to when adjudicating court cases.

    • Jeanny House

      You have the opportunity to, in all humility, admit you made a mistake and clean it up.  That shows true leadership.  Citizens United was not a good decision.  It’s playing out horrendously throughout this election season as billionaires like the Koch brothers pump money into elections in order to buy advertising that is at best misleading and at worst (and too often) outright lies.  And, because of your ruling, we never get to know just who is contributing to this, although every time I contribute to a political campaign as a real, flesh-and-blood person (instead of a symbolic corporate “person”), my name, address, and occupation must be  made public.  The Citizens United decision has paved the way for more corruption in politics.  You must reverse yourselves before more damage is done to our democracy and to our civic discourse.

    • Margaret Hickok

      Does anyone remember when the Supreme Court was the absolute arbiter of truth and reason?   Now that that once august body is owned by the Republican Party the implications for the direction our country will take is terrifying!   We will soon be going in the regrettable direction as the republican governed states, such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida, Michigan and Indiana.  Goodbye education, unions, health care, police and fire protection.  Please God, save us from the republican party and their owners…..The oligarchs who own our country.

    • Mike Hayes

      After “Citizens United”, the concept of “one person, one vote” is out the window, I think… and, that approach favoring “free speech” for huge corporations and extraordinarily wealthy persons drowns out any opportunity for the rest of us (actual, ordinary persons) to be heard… over the deafening noise of cash clanking into the campaign finance drawers… of the persons who are supposed to represent all of us…

      Please use the first opportunity that comes along to restore the right of “We the people” to be heard… as easily as it is now (after “Citizens United”) for these huge corporations and extraordinarily wealthy persons to be heard…

    • Nr29

      Our democracy cannot survive unless we get the money out of politics.  Citizens United was not the beginning, but it may have dealt a fatal blow to our republic.

    • Karen Edland

      Until Citizens United is reversed I will not have any more faith in the Supreme Court. 

    • Flounder68

      After repealing Citizens perhaps the Supreme Court should hold itself to higher standards, such as avoiding the appearance of impropriety by hanging out at secret Koch events, as well as adopting the practice of recusing themselves in cases where there is a conflict of interest – in other words hold themselves at least to the same standards of the lower courts. They are really making the law look like an ass.

    • Alison

      Our country was founded on the principle of REPRESENTATION of THE PEOPLE, not representation of the corporations nor the wealthy.  Allowing the “purchase” of our elections, thanks to the Citizen’s United ruling is a TRAVESTY! 

    • alan hedstrom

      You must stop this foolishness NOW!!!

    • kfolson

      Because if you do not overturn Citizens United, people will strongly believe what they already think, that the Supreme Court is only for sale to the ultra rich.

    • Tom

      I am co-founder of a startup business, and was previously an officer at a Fortune 50 company for many years. I have a great deal of respect for the power of free enterprise, and also have a deep understanding of why corporations cannot be on an equal footing with natural persons when it comes to constitutional protections. Corporations are profit-making entities whose goal of maximizing profits is appropriately pursued with great vigor – and that is the reason they cannot be granted full constitutional protections. They must exist within an appropriate regulatory framework, and that framework must include restrictions on political contributions. 

    • Dstan

      I protest the Citizens Unitied Decision because it transforms democracy of the people, by the people and for the people into the governing of citizens by global corporate interests for global corporate interests. It totally changes the face of democracy….by turning it into plutocracy. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1339062652 David C. Wood

      Corporations are people no more than I’m a corporation. They don’t fight or die in our wars, they have no physical presence, they can’t even shake my hand or talk to me. 
      They have no right to vote, nor should they be able to use their financial power to determine elections! I have lost all faith & respect for the Supreme Court. Since there is now a political arm of the Republican party with four votes I really fear for my freedom. Will the court permit and advocate for the takeover of our government by Corporations or will the do the moral, fair and honest thing and revoke this totally unconstitutional law.

      Sincerely,
      David C. Wood

      PS: I’m a 65 year old Proud Gay American and I am afraid that this ruling and future Human Rights rulings by the court could percipitate not only unrest but more likely rioting like this country has never seen. I will join in if necessary!

    • People4people

      If you value democracy you will overturn Citizens United.  If you value democracy you will admit you blew that decision.

    • Mariomorais8

      citizens united, was a bad decision, that decision is selling our democracy! please protect our democracy and kill citizens united

    • RickBeing

      “We the People” means we the human beings, not legal entities and paper fictions!
      Stand up for human dignity and human rights!  We object to corporations being given citizenship rights of a human being.
      We object to any and all contenders.  We are human beings and American citizens, not corporations.
      A corporation has no soul or conscience, the comparision is an insult to humanity.

    • M Vevera

      The premise that corporations are people and money is speech is ludicrous. The harm that the Citizen’s United decision has done to our country is on par with Dred Scott. Take the only step that anyone with a clear conscience could possibly take and reverse this appalling ruling.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=658741496 Donna Slinger

      When our government can be bought and sold like a commodity, it’s time to stop calling it a Democracy. 

    • Gregg Rooten

      In the Dred Scott case the Court said people are property and in Citizens United that property is people. It’s too late for the former but you can correct your historical legacy now by overturning your decision in the latter.

    • mynewusenm

      Just
      a little slice of American history. The Founding Fathers were so
      concerned, some say feared, big corporations that they made
      protections for us as they limited Corporate strength to that of a
      company. The founders feared that the American Corporations would so
      much control Government if left to their greedy devices, as British
      Corporations did here before the American Revolution, that they
      wanted to keep corporate money out of government. Kind of a
      “Separation Of Corporations and State” so to speak. The founders
      knew the country couldn’t grow and prosper without business but they,
      in their wisdom, wanted to maintain a distance. This seemed to work
      until after the Civil War when Corporations seemed to make “friendly
      gestures” toward government officials. From there things went down
      hill to this day.

      Questions.
      Isn’t it so funny when we hear from those who are so totally in favor
      of big corporations and the very wealthy today also claim they are so
      much in tune with the Founding Fathers and The US Constitution? Why
      do these same people want to alter or even weaken The Constitution?

      I
      believe the Founding Fathers knew without that “Separation Of
      Corporations and State”, so to speak, We The People, the unwealthy
      people primarily, would so much lose out. I also strongly believe
      that is why “Separation OF Church And State”, for very similar
      reasons, is needed to be added to The Constitution along side Freedom
      Of Religion but that is another issue – or is it?

    • srinlow

      As a retired public school teacher who has always valued the wisdom that our country was founded on, it is amazing to see that such a travesty of our heritage and the protections given in our wonderful Constitution has been destroyed by the Citizens United fiasco.  In the interest of our children and grandchildren, my husband and I feel we must protest and support actions to rid this destructive decision that is undermining the freedoms and the rights for public awareness that many have fought and died for.

    • Alex Panarisi

      To the members of the Supreme Court who believe money equals speech: You are right to put forth those views in the marketplace of economic activities and commerce where money as free speech is used to promote the consumption of goods and services; however, you are absolutely wrong to allow money to equal free speech in the politics of our nation because it dilutes the inalienable rights of individual citizenship that each American enjoys and instead creates super citizens who have rights that are recognized by legal statutes and judicial decisions to be thousands, if not millions or more times that of citizens without that type of financial power and status. 

    • Krdblind

      In my lifetime, no ruling by the Supreme Court
      has moved me more than that of the so called “Citizens United”.  Unfortunately it
      moved me in the worst possible way. I was appalled at the apparent
      indifference of my fellow citizens - I wanted to riot in the
      streets! 

      I am by no measure a card-carrying “liberal”
      who rallies behind every liberal cause – I’d classify myself as a socially
      progressive, fiscally conservative independent. 

      I
      resonate strongly with the views of Lawrence Lessig – that overturning Citizens
      United should be a non-partisan movement. I am as strongly against unions
      “buying” political favor as I am against the oil companies doing the same. It
      is in the best interest of all citizens that our government represents the
      people (not big money). 

    • Charles a. King

      I endorse the eloquent comments listed here.  I hope all the justices read all of them and reverse their Citizens United decision.  It is vital to this nation’s future.

    • Seth Jackson

      Money isn’t speech.  It’s an amplifier of speech.   Free speech is illusory if one person’s amplifier goes so loud that it drowns out everyone else.   

      The government is supposed to represent the people and serve their interests.   With the role money serves in our current electoral process, influence is easily bought and sold to the highest bidder, resulting in a government that serves campaign donors rather than the American people.   It’s highly unlikely that this is what the Founders envisioned when they drafted the Constitution, and it’s a fundamental problem with our system that can only be solved by allowing Congress to regulate the campaign finance process. 

    • Dalendave

      To consider monetary contributions of corporations to be equal to speech and apply the doctrine of the right of free speech to make corporate campaign contributions unlimited is undermining democracy.  The Supreme Court has elevated the status of corporations above the status of citizens.

    • Barbara

      Unfortunately when Justice Roberts and Alito came along, many of us knew the disasters awaiting our nation.  Their history of ruling in favor of corporations over mere citizens was already known.  But they obfuscated and lied to the Senate and unfortunately were confirmed.  Joining the already seated Thomas, the least intelligent member of the court ever approved, Scalia, the sexist and corporate tool as well, and you have a recipe for the destruction of our nation from enemies to democracy from within.   Citizens United was the obvious method to accomplish this, paricularly by addressing issues not in the original case.  The shame history will blanket this court in will never be erased from the books.  The only thing we can hope for is that the decision is reversed by the Congress with a Constitutional Amendment, or the Roberts court comes to its senses and reverses its original decision.  The shame, however, will still be there.

    • Sleonard1001

      The Justice Department is suing Wal-Mart for bribing foreign officials. I fail to see what difference there is between that and the way money flows within this country. I have asked my elected representatives for their responses and have heard nothing. Our representatives answer to their donors, not the voters who put them in office.

    • AEH

      How sad it is to have completely lost faith in a nonpartisan United States Supreme Court.  I’m of that age when school taught us our “Supreme” Court was to be revered……  that their judgements were as close to being legally infallible as humans could get.  Then came 2000, when my belief in that nonpartisan infallibility disappeared.  With the Citizen’s United decision, my belief in the United States Supreme Court has turned to cynicism:  like everything else it seems, politics swallowed our once revered highest court & turned it into another tool for Corporate America.  

    • celein4

      I’m sick to death of corporate influence buying our politicians so they can continue running this country as opposd to the people who vote here, live here and are being more and more disenfranchised by big business. They give us only politicians THEY want elected for us to choose from, leaving us with no real choices of our own.  Each politician should quit slipping through loopholes to get all the funding they want, therefore blocking out politicians who may actually do something about the corporate greed within the walls of OUR government.  The fact that our supreme court making decisions which continue this massive buying of government only shows that they are also a part of it and should be defrocked!

    • AJRain

      The Supreme Court decision in “Citizens United” overlooks the fact that INDIVIDUALS already are represented by our Constitution, regardless of their affiliation–or lack thereof–with a company or corporation. Giving CORPORATIONS representation as if they are entities apart and separate from the people of whom they are comprised is a corruption of the very definitions of both “person” and “corporation.” The effect of “Citizens United” has already been seen in our electoral process: those with more money can buy political influence, while those with less money cannot. This is not the America for which our ancestors–and our military forces–were, and still are, willing to fight and die. Please return our country to ALL of its citizens: Reverse your decision on “Citizens United.” Make the United States once again the beacon of individual rights, freedom, and rule that has set an example for the rest of the world.

    • Betty Armstead

      Corporations are not people and should not be allowed to contribute
      to political campaigns (especially without full disclosure).

    • Bryan Van Gelder

      Money in the wrong places and from the wrong sources produces an outcome that is wrong for our country.  Our men and women of congress have become professional fundraisers, and have moved their focus from serving the public to serving their need for a fundraising high, like a junkie.  Citizens United is a dealer helping to feed that high.  Let’s kick the habit…

    • Cindy Hollenbeck

      When this bill was passed, I was stunned. Our country is supposed to be a democracy for the people by the people, not corporations. How is this possible when big money is deciding what is right for them, not us. We need to stop this. Politicians are not doing their jobs that we the people are paying them to do, because they are out getting money from the highest bidder. They are not representing us. They are representing the money. This is not what our country was established on. Please repeal this bill, and make our country fair, and for the people again.

      Sincerely,
      Cindy Hollenbeck

    • Heather Larkin

      Everyone makes mistakes.  You guys made a biggie.  Admit it, overturn “Citizens”, and let’s get on with trying to save our democracy.

    • Clarkmrb

      The people of this nation depended on sound judicial evaluation of the Citizens United case as to its affects on the workings of our Democracy.  Simply upholding what may have been precedent is unacceptable if, as in this case, the result would deleteriously affect the welfare of our Democracy and its people.  We urge you to reconsider your erroneous decision to award “personhood” to corporations!

    • Kathleen Bertolini

      My wife and I want our democracy back!  This Citizens United decision causes us to feel impotent.  We do not want our electorate to feel impotent.

    • Lucy

      Since when are corporations “people”???  The idea is ludicrous.  Lobbyists should be banned outright. This gridlock debacle in Congress would never have happened without all the “favors” owed to moneyed special interest campaign contributors.  Both parties are guilty.

    • Hsnydick

      There was a time when the Supreme Court stood for equality, fairness and high moral character, as determine by the very time and place in history that it found itself.  Partisan politics was supposed to be left at the door and decisions be made of the merits of that which was put before the Court.

      If that were still true today, there could be no justification for the backward Citizens United decision.  There can be nothing fair and equitable about setting the standard by which our poiticians may be, and in fact are, bought and sold by moneyed special interests.

      That decision is subverting the intent on which this country was born; it disregards the Constitution of these United States and all that which is fair and equitable.  It subverts the process and this our respect for a system, once strong, that has gone putrid.

      Reverse the decision.  Have the courage to disregard the politicians.  Have the humanity to do what is fair and equitable.  Have the compassion to again include the downtrodden and outcast in the decision making process that will determine the paths their life may take.

    • Rosalie medert-Hoover

      This law will be the downfall of democracy.  it turns the election process into a big sale; the winners will be those who can afford to buy elections.  Please repeal this very harmful decision.

    • Brian and Linda Parsons Sewell

      Citizens United is the must undemocratic ruling one could conceive.

    • Wmolloy

      The Citizens United ruling has don considerable damage to our electoral process.  Far too much money has been put into it without transparency. This is not consistent with our concept of fairness and freedom.  Corporations ARE NOT persons.  They are businesses acting for groups of persons.  It is time to make a clearer distinction.    

    • Rpw715

      We have seen what money in enormous amounts from one or five individuals has done to our politics during this election cycle. It doesn’t seem like we’re 1 person, 1 vote; when a handful of people can give millions of dollars to buy a candidate or ruin another. The citizens elect people to serve us, but it seems we’re serving them. These huge ad buys could pay for a lot of things we need to help our country. We already know who’s running,, we don’t like the mud slinging, we want our vote to be from our hearts & minds, not have our hearts ripped out because of a few individuals’ beliefs. We are all citizens of this country and should be treated equally, paraticularly at the ballot box.

    • Michael Schwister

      The influence of money has put us on a path of a Plutocratic Oligarchy. Any other conclusion is delusional. Corporate money in our politics has corrupt the American dream, and transferred the wealth of our country to a minority at the very top. We have stepped backwards in excellence to pander to greed and the Citizens United decision is choking our democracy, leaving most of us without representation. Please consider what has happened to our election process and leave corporations out of our governance.

    • ChalW

      Corporations exist to make profits for shareholders – not to write government policy and own politicians – that is called fascism. Corporations are not interested in the common good, democracy, clean air and water, safety at work – these are all external to their drive for profits and only government regulations provides protection for citizens from the potential abuse of corporations.  When politicians have to earn millions to run for office, they have no time to do their actual work, but must constantly court interest groups and lobbyists for donations. Public campaign financing would be the true answer to the problem but would probably allow way to much ‘democracy’ to exist and be too scary for the 1%.

    • Aislin Gerow

      I don’t think there is any doubt that we all know what the right thing to do is in this situation. Politics and money need to be kept strictly separate for the greater good of our people and our society. Please, please, overturn Citizens United. 

    • snydley14437

       Our Founding Fathers NEVER in their wildest dream would have allowed unlimited, unaccountable political donations allowed in our political system. This election system has turned into a big money system where money influences the outcome. Our system is supposed to be a 1 man 1 vote system, with everyone’s vote being equal. With all this money being spent, because of the Citizen’s United ruling, this is no longer the case. This ruling needs to be REVERSED, corporations ARE NOT PEOPLE!!

    • Mailman145-adds

      I am sure our founding fathers had no idea of what the poltical process would look like in todays world And the meaining of We The People meaning many people not just the select few or the corperations as people who can simpley run over the masses with money and power, you the nine justices are the last line of defence for we the people not the corporations

    • West Winds

      The Supreme Court erred when it put forth Citizens United, and even those who are profiting from such an intentionally misguided decision know it. The Supreme Court has allowed itself to become the private playpen of the industrialist and investment people.
      This really got going with Rehnquist’s intervention into the 2000 election and Bush v. Gore; lawless behavior that the Constitution prohibits.

      The whole purpose of the three separate branches of government is to insure the protection of We the People. However, due to the loading of the highest court in the land with Far Right fringe personalities, a downward spiral in ethics, integrity and honesty prevails threatening to render the whole of the judiciary as lacking any credibility whatsoever. 

      To support secret money buying off influence in our government, to afford foreign money a place in our governmental processes is anathema and the Court knows this. And to give personhood to a stack of paper and ink is to render a false equivocation between corporations, a legal fiction, and human beings; a supreme insult to the American people this court purports to preside over.

      There is a difference between Capitalism and Predatory Capitalism and by the Court’s actions, they have sanctioned the most predatory of business practices. The Justices are supposed to apply the law through stare decisis, not be politicians from the bench. This is fundamental and I’m sure these facts are not lost on the members of the Court.

      Stop this now. Repeal Citizens United and reform the conduct of the Court before it is too late. The decision of the Supreme Court in all of this will surely lay the foundation of what will come.

    • Stephen Newman

      The constitution never said $1 = 1 vote. Nor is a corporation a person.

    • Jon Garcia

      The political process has become more about financing the next campaign than actually governing at the will of the people that the duly elected officials are meant to represent.  This is not a right, left, or anywhere in between issue.  This is a common sense issue.  When political decisions are influenced by the highest bidder, where does that leave our system?  How is that a system by the people, for the people?  How is it fair and just?  How then, are these elected officials supposedly representing the people who placed them in office when they are catering to the highest bidder and serving the special interests that will greatly finance their next campaign?  I beg you to reconsider this ruling.  The fact that this ruling not only allows, but encourages corporations et al to be able to finance a campaign is supremely disappointing.  Do the justices really not see the likelihood of collusion and corruption that this so easily avails itself to?  Again, I plead with the justices that a long, hard look is taken at this ruling.  I am hopeful that common sense and law can coexist peacefully.

    • Cherise

      When unlimited funds are allowed in politics, the politicians who take those unlimited funds are beholden to those Corporations. Corporations are writing our laws and handing them to their bought off puppets. People elect BUT the Corporations own their ass. Blatant Conflict of Interest. There is only one oath our Gov’t officials take. It’s to serve the people. And it shouldn’t be taken with a “wink wink.” Ever wonder why Citizen’s United could pass in the first place? Wink Wink!! Corporations Are NOT People. Get the MONEY out of Politics. Repeal C.U.

    • atljams

      A Supreme Court is supposed to have some sort of intelligence to be confirmed.  Maybe some of them have gone brain dead since.  Anyone in their right mind could see what would happen if business were permitted to spend unlimited funds to champion the minions who would continue to support lessening regulations and environmental laws for their benefit.  The Supremes have created a corrupted process that has shown to be out of control.  The 99% needs to recall some the justices who have legitimzed this corruption.  Corportations are NOT people and money is NOT free speech. 

      • Nnnooccc

        Maybe the supreme justices are aliens and we are now fighting The War of the Worlds.  Sure feels like it.

    • Tom W

      Spending power should not equal freedom of speech.  I resent the idea that a millionaire can buy more freedom than I can afford. Everyone has a voice to use to make their opinion known, keep dollars out of the freedom equation.

    • Senior

      Unfortunately, politicians (elected elite, self-serving, career, incumbents) are for sale.  Not a new condition – but, worse now than ever before.  Our gov’t has been bought (& sold) and has nothing to do with original considerations about “governing”.  Influence (contact, access, insider knowledge) has replaced national well being as the process used.  Party 1st rants are nothing more than control efforts by groupies with little to offer citizen taxpayers, who foot the bill.
      Money is all that matters to most of those participants (at all levels) & honesty & integrity no longer exist in the halls of Gov’t.
      Unfortunate, too, is the gullibility of greedy, dependent, and shallow mentality of voters who are too lazy to determine the end result of dishonest/inept/incompetence paid for by big money interests at all levels.
      Now it’s really important to know what the meaning of “is” is – -

    • John Hinson

      My ancestors fought along side many other in the Revolutionary War to help establish a democratic country. They were salt of the earth individuals who knew the value of freedom and of a representative democracy. Subsequent generations of their descendants have also stepped up and fought for this country, many of whom paid the ultimate price for freedom. Those who remain silent in the face of the injustice of what is happening to our system of government, betray the sacrifices of all those who came before us.
       

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.shinal John Shinal

      Citizens of the USA are entitled to EQUAL protection under the law. This previous ruling destroys that principle, by giving improper influence to corporations and groups of proxies that are far more powerful than most citizens, even citizens acting in groups. By creating a mechanism friendly to graft and influence peddling, the previous ruling grants voting influence to non-person entities and proxies who are not lawfully allowed to vote.

      I am aghast and *ashamed* that the Supreme Court of my beloved country could have created this ruling, one so amenable to corruption and dishonesty and so corrosive to the well being of our citizen’s voting system.

      John. S. Shinal
      Raleigh, NC

    • dave

      We are all being sold out, right or left, whoever has the biggest bank account and or friends. Its not all the politicians fault, people need to stop watching prime time and start watching “our time” and our future.  Wake up 

    • mdd

      It’s painfully obvious to see that Citizens United is an endorsement of bribery and “scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” cronyism that it’s insulting to every American that has faith in our system. This is another example of the few and wealthy stomping all over the people who really count.

    • Aileen Scurato

      The Supreme Court has become a sham…selling our country to the highest bidders…corporations are not “we the people”.  If the court will not act as our Founding fathers intended, perhaps we should push for a constitutional amendment disbanding the Supreme Court…

    • http://www.MuteTheLoot.org/ Ron

      The good news, at least here in Vermont, is that 63 Towns voted Yes on March 6, 2012 (Town Meeting Day), on a resolution urging a Constitutional Amendment to overturn the Citizens United vs. FEC decision.  On April 11th and 19th respectively, the majority of Vermont State Senators and House Reps concurred with the public and passed a joint Senate-House resolution calling for Vermont’s Congressional delegation to work towards a Constitutional Amendment challenging corporate personhood.

      Despite this good news, it will not do us any good for the 2012 Election.  The Super PAC donors have $Millions to spend on negative attack ads.  We The People can never match this level of spending, even in better economic times.  The level of spending has become a veritable “arms race” of spending, threatening to take down our democracy, and it will only get worse in 2012.

      What can “We the People” do?  The Super PAC donors may have $Millions of Dollars.  But “We the People” have millions of TV remote controls with a MUTE button.  How do you fight against the “Goliath” Super PACs?  With “David” remote controls:

      Can’t wait for Congress, or a lawsuit / Put your finger on the MUTE, … button.

      http://www.MuteTheLoot.org/

      Mute The Loot 2012 … Check out the Mute The Loot song!

    • MikeS

      Money, like yelling “fire” in a theatre when there is none is a clear and present danger to the democracy and shouldn’t be designated as protected speech, but treated as a real dangerous fire.

    • Mdumas40

      The citizens of this country cannot expect to receive equal protection under the laws of the United States, as required by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, if elections are for sale to the highest bidder.

    • Gwf3rd

      Your ruling has been a disgrace and the worst thing to happen to our Democracy in history.  Corporations are not People and elections should not be bought. Reverse this terrible mistake if you have ANY integrity.

    • Edwards

      I’m 84 years old, have voted in every election, but since Citizens United I feel totally disenfranchised.  Corporations are not people. They should not be able to buy our elections. Money is not speech.

    • Mafraylee

      I am appalled that the SCOTUS would rule for Citizens United, and against the hardworking voters of this nation.  This is just wrong and promotes corruption and subverts the voting process.  This decision needs to be reversed. 

    • Penny Hammack

      The obscene amount of money being spent on campaigns is a direct result of Citizens United. And, if I work for a company that supports a candidate with large amounts of money and I don’t agree with that action, I can either suck it up and keep my head down so I won’t get fired or quit and go on unemployment. Is that fair? Even in the unlikely event that the company takes a poll of it’s employees and prorates the amounts donated to each candidate I still risk getting fired if I don’t agree with the CEO or those who make the decision to donate. My one vote is not equivalent to nor will ever be equivalent to the amount spent by large corporations. I remember when companies and churches too told their employees and members how to vote. How is this different?

    • Sherco

      Where has plain old common sense gone; much less the rule of law??  ”Corporations are people” is one of the greatest blunders of a Supreme Court, ever.  I’m afraid it will no longer be viewed as the esteemed Supreme Court, steeped in revered awe, but rather, The Court of Supreme Fools. 

    • Sally S.

      Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of the Constitution, but I don’t think it’s in the spirit of the Constitution for some people or corporations to have greater freedom of speech because they have more money than others.

    • Bcgilligan

       You’re out of line, gentlemen!  Corporations are not “individuals, my friend.”  They are corporations …. period.  Your ruling has turned what is left of our democracy into an auction, with the prize going to those who throw the most money at it.  Reverse this decision before the USA becomes a country ‘of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations.’  Dwight Eisenhower warned us over 50 years ago about the dangers posed by the military-industrial complex.  I think Dwight would have considered your “Citizens United” ruling  ‘military-industrial complex squared.’

      Reverse it now!

    • Ckoproductionskiyosan

      Here’s a metaphor: JOHNS = Millionaires/ Billionaires
                                 PIMPS = Lobbyist
                                 WHORES= CONGRESS/RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT JUDGES

    • ana

      This decision is based on the flawed precedent of corporate personhood, which really gives corporations a super person standing and if we keep stacking the deck against natural persons a socialist, communist type revolution will occur, it is already happening in Greece. If FDR had not implemented the regulations on capitalism making the economy kinder and fairer to the average citizen we may well be a communist nation today. Those policies saved both democracy and capitalism. Allowing these multinational corporations to simply purchase our government in order to eliminate those same safeguards and regulations as well as their tax burdens will lead to the destruction of this country. Our country was founded on the basic principles of a free and fair system. The revolutionary war was fought because of undue influence of the East India Corporation on the Parliament in England and their unfair tax advantages over local merchants.  Please read your history and learn from it and do not let this country fall.

    • Nancy & Ronald Cooper

      We feel that the money pouring into the Super Pacs etc. from unknown donors just adds to more corruption of the election process. With so many people in the U.S. suffering, losing & jobs it is depressing to see money thrown around like candy for TV Ads etc. to buy an election.

       Nancy & Ronald Cooper

    • Patn

      Reverse your ruling for citizens united. God have mercy on your soul.

    • Dave

      History will be ‘Your Judge’. It will show that you were ‘NOT’.  Fascism has an unmistakable face and your masks fail you. Shame…. 

    • Bill C

      Allowing the wealthy unlimited political contributions
      guarantees unequal influence for the very wealthy minority.  This is the same debate we had in the late 19th
      century. The accumulation of wealth and corresponding political power within a
      small part of the population led to abusive monopolies.  The lessons of the Robber Barons apply
      today.  Political contributions need
      regulation in the same manner as the “trusts” were regulated.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_463G7BK76ZAQ37EAAPBNOEV3OU Drew

      Dear Justices,
      Can you draft a corporation to serve in a war or execute a corporation for committing a crime? If not, then corporations are not people. You made a terrible mistake. You have the opportunity to correct it. If you refuse to correct it, the people will be relentless. We are waking up to the corruption that surrounds us.

    • Drgray7153

      The original Citizen United decision did not make sense to me.  Now that I am seeing the results of the decision in action, it is making even less sense.  I have reread our Constitution and Bill of Rights carefully trying to find where our founding fathers gave support to this idea of corporations having the same rights as people and I just don’t find anything.  I really believe that if our founding fathers were to return and see the results of the Citizen United decision they would think they had somehow failed to accomplish what they had intended. 

    • Linda Niceswanger

      I’m a senior citizen, and I have never seen anything as misguided as the Citizens United ruling!  I feel that the voices of regular citizens, like me, no longer count, when corporations and anonymous wealthy donors, even foreign entities, can overshadow me with their huge moneybags.  This decision was wrong-headed, and I think even you now know that it was.  Please own up to your mistake, and reverse this disastrous decision.

    • Wilhelm Johannes Kiesselbach

      Ladies and gentlemen,

      This entire concept is more than baffling and although I am not an
      expert at interpreting the constitution I fail to believe how the
      writers of that great document could have possibly wanted for the
      almighty dollar to not merely influence, but control our
      political process. That particularly when it is almost exclusively used
      for smear campaigns the likes of which we have not seen, the likes of
      which are unique in the world. I am a Vietnam veteran and volunteered to
      fight for this country and everything it stands for but trust me, I did
      not sign up for this and I very much doubt that any of my brothers did.

      Respectfully,

      Wilhelm Johannes Kiesselbach

    • Monica G.

      There has been no integrity on the Supreme Court since GWB was put into office.  You are not enforcing our laws; you are enforcing your politial ideology on our country!  Why do Republicans think they have to cheat to win?  Why spend all this money on commercials when you can just cheat with the voting machines?  Guaranteed, that’s coming next!

    • Margaret Mock

      YOUR RULING HAS BEEN A DISGRACE TO THE INTEGRITY AND COMMON SENSE OF OUR DEMOCRACY.  IT APPEARS THAT YOU, TOO, ARE RULED BY THE MONIED INTERESTS THAT ARE CONTROLLING THE OUTCOMES OF ELECTIONS, AND THEREFORE OUT FATE.
      HOW CAN YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT, AS A BODY, WHEN YOU MUST AWAKENED EACH MORNING TO THE THE FALLOUT OF YOUR FAILURE TO ACT TO PROTECT THE PUBLICE TRUST YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD!!!!!

      WHAT YOU HAVE DONE AS A BODY IS UTTERLY SHAMEFUL.

    • Carolyn Bass

      I was taught in Civics Class that the Supreme Court is suppose to interpret the Law, not make it.  Citizens United is the most destructive thing that has ever happened to our country.  Corporations ARE NOT people. And they should not be able to buy the congress and courts in our great country.  Give the Country back to the PEOPLE.  The founding fathers are turning over in their graves.  Alot of people died for the rights we have.  The Supreme Court has no right dictating those rights!!!!!

    • Hmgbird60

      Corporations are NOT human beings! They cannot speak, give birth, walk, eat,…. They ARE NOT covered/protected under the US Constitution.

      Citizen’s United is a corruption of the political process, a slander against the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and should be overturned.

    • Russell R Samuelson

      The worst Supreme Court decision in my lifetime and I am now 66 years of age. How you could call a Corporation to be concidered as a person  with the same rights as me as a citizen of this great nation. How can you even think that 1 corporation can spend any amount of money to influence any of our elections and call it free speech is insane. Where is the fairness in that? 

    • jhr459

      I was shocked and saddened by the SCOTUS’ determination that corporations are legally the same as individuals. This has forever tipped the scales of equality in this country as no individual could hope to compete financially with a corporation. This is contrary to the positions of Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower and Harry Truman to name just a few statesmen who spoke out against the dangers of allowing the ‘military-industrial complex’ too much power in this country. Please reconsider this egregious affront to individual Americans.

    • Ronthompson42

        I am a “neolithic conservative” after the author of “Growing Up Absurd,” Paul Goodman.  I spoke with him recently and he said “Citizens United” is defintely not citizens and definitely not united.  ”Mutual Aid” should be are aim not the expansion and elavation of greed.

    • Scott. P

      During President Obama’s 2010 or 2011 State of the Union speech he expressed his belief that the court’s Citizens United ruling would cause unequal campaign funding opportunities in our republic.  Justice Alito sat at that speech shaking his head saying, “that’s not true” in front of the national television audience, including my wife and I.  Well, it sure looks like the rich are making this problem come to pass.  Obviously, concerns that big money may buy influence is playing out, now! Revisit your decisions on the Citizens United case and do what is right for the entire population, not just the wealthy with their undo influence caused by unlimited political contributions. 

    • J.A. O’Connor

      Our country was founded by People for People. In Citizens United we allowed the corporations and undisclosed donors to influence our political system. If this is allowed to continue our government will no longer be by the People for the people, all people equal regardless of wealth, it will be look at what my money can buy! Please do not let this travesty continue.

    • Nevesxis

      I, too, am clueless as to the current direction of the Supreme Court and how they could even begin to equate individual freedoms with corporate rights.  Wrong-headed.  Ill-informed.  Mis-judged!  The People will not stand for the corporate misappropriation of Democracy…

    • Patrick Monk. RN.

      To all members of the the Supremely Suspect Court.
       Thank you for finally putting the sword to the disastrous turn of events and history that I was unable to thwart almost 250 years ago. 
      I remain, as always, your most obedient and supplicant servant, as you are to your corporate sovereigns,
      Benedict Arnold (in absentia)

    • Timhildebrandt

      To Kennedy, Alito, Roberts, Thomas & Scalia: You have betrayed the concept of justice and should renounce your right to sit in judgement on the Supreme Court. You are all so obviously partisan and biased in favor of the corporate state that has bought our democracy, that you’ve lost all credibility as judges. You have absolutely no respect from me and deserve none from the American people. We will work together to undue the harm you’ve imposed on this country and look forward to the end of your terms so we can replace you with real justice and clear objective thinking.

    • Ray Peppers

      As a member of the military and later as a 32-year diplomat I effectively served my country with pride and patriotism.  The democracy I loved is gone, thanks to court’s activist ruling that corporations are people.  If they don’t have navels, they are not people.  But they can elect and/or buy our legislatures.  Your ruinous ruling must be reversed.  

      Ray Peppers, Minister-Counselor (Rtd), Foreign Service of the USA.

    • Jvwitter

      The United States government is corrupt and unjust. The democracy crushing Citizens United must be overturned or the next stop is the Banana Republic of America!

    • Terry Nelson

      I looked up the definition of corporation the other day and what is says is that a corporation is a group of people.  People who already have rights as citizens including the right to vote.  By expanding the definition of person-hood to include corporations you are essentially giving those people an additional vote.  This is entirely unfair and complete abrogation of the “one man, one vote” rule.  The decision which began this legal fiction (Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific Railroad) was rendered by a Supreme Court comprised of judges who worked for the railroad.  Corporate person-hood is just a flimsy rationale to give the oligarchs what they want.  Citizens United reverses the basic concept of equal treatment under the law and is among the most damaging decisions ever rendered by this group of toadies to the rich.  In a system of checks and balances, who checks the Supreme Court?  Apparently no one if this is the result

      “Slavery is the legal fiction that people are property–corporate person-hood is the legal fiction that property is people”.

      • CherMoe

         Your reasoning makes total sense.  The SCOTUS knows you’re right as well, but they don’t REALLY serve the physical individual persons in our country.  NO ONE checks the Supreme Court and they sit on the bench for life, despite wrongdoings.  Just as GWB and Cheney went free for their war crimes and torture and the wars based on lies AND the biggie …. GWB being installed in the White House by the SCOTUS ….  crimes only matter when you’re a little guy.  If you’ve got a big name and money … different story, apparently.  After all, the SCOTUS doesn’t have to impress US.  They are appointed and we get no say-so.  They “interpret” the Constitution as they wish, not as it is necessarily meant to be.

    • Dan Halloran

      Sen. Barry Goldwater in his “Conscience of a Conservative” Stated “when we allow Unions and Corporations unlimited spending in our elections it will be the end of our Democracy”

    • Skientop

      Perhaps they became lost in precedent, forgetting for a moment that as the Supreme Court they are called to do equal right to both the poor and the rich. This to me is most grievously the error of the Citizens United decision. It inherently acceded greater rights to the wealthy, when it was already clear to many that they have the lion’s share.

      It was such a forgone conclusion that more wealth equals more rights, that we went one step further. Wealth alone deserves more rights even if it is held by an organization of individuals.

      More wealth equals more freedom of speech.
      More wealth equals more rights.

      Is this not the forgone conclusion upon which this decision rests?

    • Stepheng Bishop

      To say that the U.S. has not returned to feudalism is to ignore the obvious.

    • Concerned Citizen in Oklahoma

      What can the Supreme Court possibly be thinking. This is suppose to be a country of the people and for the people, not a country run by a few billionaires. We should be going in the other direction. Put a cap on what can be spent in the various campaigns. Please end citizens united now!

    • Carol M.

      The historical required reporting (name, address, amount) of any contribution (to a political campaign) over a specified amount has been a fairly good guard against “undue influence”, serving us well in the political arena. The phrase “undue influence” has historically been understood to be excessive MONEY.  If these Super Pacs (which, by the way, are not individual/private persons) are allowed to continue you, the U.S. Supreme Court, will guarantee that 99% of American Voters have no influence. When did money equate to speech under the Constitution?  Please do not continue to allow money to overrule our vote, to become our only method of being heard.  If “money corrupts” then Big Money corrupts BIG.

    • Rhnjoecool

      True Democracy is not bought and paid for by rich billionaires.  How can it be called “free speech”?  It is only “free” if you have the money to pay for it — and most of us don’t!

    • Leslie Walker

      Having felt so discouraged by a gridlocked, partisan Congress, I considered the Supreme Court to be the last bastion of true democracy, committed to the ideals of our founding fathers.  Their decision stunned and saddened me and, now that the outcome is so frighteningly clear, I can only hope they will reconsider.  So much is at stake…..

    • Robert Jones

      The Citizen’s United decision gives too much power to those with large amounts of money.  It supports government for sale in a big way.  We need to stop it.

    • Jalmaney

      Citizens United dismays and frightens me. I believe it compromises our democratic process. On a personal level, it endangers my belief that my vote counts. Knowing that millionaires and corporations are allowed to contribute unlimited funds to back the candidate of their choice…either by donating to a candidate’s campaign or by producing TV ads through some “Super Pac” (which are often hateful, fear-mongering ads to discredit the opponent) infuriates me. These extremely wealthy individuals and large corporations who are now allowed to donate unlimited and unidentified funds are buying our elections and, in effect, able to influence the outcome of an election to the point that my vote may not count at all. This is disgraceful and certainly not what our founding fathers envisioned for our country.

      I am 74 years old and I’ve never missed voting in a presidential election. I’ve served as an election judge for the past nine years. I am very bright and alert…in fact, have been invited to join Mensa after scoring in the 98th percentile on their test. My intelligence and cognitive abilities have not been impaired by my age.  I state this so that you will not assume that these statements are being made by a senile senior.

      Until the appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court I had confidence in that body’s ability to perform in the best interests of our nation. Since then, and especially after the election of George Bush to a second term, decided by the court, I have even less respect for the court and less confidence in their decisions. The only bright and hopeful factor that I see are the two most recent appointees, Sonia Sotomayer and Elena Kagan. However, if the Supreme Court continues to uphold Citizens United, I believe I will loose all faith in our system. This is not the kind of country I want to envision my children (four) and grandchildren (13) living in…
      where their votes won’t matter.

      I truly believe that Citizens United is a threat to our democracy!

    • Michelleamorgan

      Your Citizens United ruling effectively ended democracy in America. 

      Thanks to Citizens United, all candidates are pre-selected by corporate and billionaire funding. By the time We the People get to vote, regardless of party affiliation, our choice is between two equally corrupted candidates, each owing their political life to big money. Thanks to Citizens United, We the People no longer have even the illusion of exerting any influence in our government through elections. 

      Shame on you. Please reverse Citizens United NOW.

      Allison

    • Dale Pollard

      This is exactly why people have such a low opinion of our congress and senate.  Its not enough that they are bought and sold like whores by the elite, now the elite wants to purchase elections directly.  Why buy many whores when you can do the same result with just one!

    • Verna Browning

      It becomes more and more obvious how the Citizens United decision has corrupted our electoral system. That corporations and rich individuals can use their moniy to influence our elections, but they do not even have to disclose theit identities. WOW what happened to government of the people, by the people, and for the people, ALL THE PEOPLE NOT JUST THE RICH. Corporations are NOT people.

    • Nuihc_1st

      I’m truly ashamed of my country. We all know it’s for sale to the highest bidder. Citizen’s United. Revolving door lobbyists. Unethical speculators. And so much more.

    • Wolfbytez

      Too bad Mccain doesn’t afford any respect to the treaties this country signed with Native American tribes. He {and Kyl} are the last people who should even use the word democracy.  It is just so damn easy to steal water from Indians who live in the desert and give it to the whites who build huge cities and need it more, who cares about a bunch of old Indians?  It is so much more profitable to give it to big coal and other private, ALEC run big businesses.  You should both hang your head in shame.  This is not bad enough but now you jerks are writing laws against women for WASHINGTON DC?   ALEC IS Big Brother and Mccain and Kyl are privatizing everything to support it.  BEWARE, anyone who values freedom, democracy, less big government and a vagina with no senators, congressmen and republicans inside it better keep a close eye on all these jerks—I am a woman and I certainly don’t expect MEN to make medical or birth control decisions for me.  If you men don’t want women making decisions for your prostate, testicles, anus, rectal exams, probes, vasectomies, and viagra decisions for you then STOP this crap now.  Eventually, when women are tired of dealing with this we will just DENY all prescriptions for viagra and other ED meds, then YOU won’t be making the bedroom decisions for US!!  As for republicans and catholics, you can’t have sex with us unless WE ARE FERTILE, and, menopause??  You can never have sex again lololol!!  WE WIN!!!  LOLOL

    • Chuck Earley Sr

      It is dis-heartening to me when I vote; does my vote really count? So much money wasted on special interests when resources could be going to just making this country great again!

    • Ralph J. Secoy

      The Citizens United split decision creates a government where the wealthy support political campaigns in return for influence – essentially selling our legislators “to the highest bidder(s)”.  This leaves the Middle and Lower Income Classes absent essentially any regard for their interests in the governmental process.  The decision that money is free speech is highly activist in nature and overturns precedent without regard for the public good.  Judicial expertise is not needed to understand the corrupting result of Citizens United, and everybody – especially the rich – fully understand this.  Just as in Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court has made a decision which is specifically for one political party – exactly that which the Court is supposed to rise above.  History will not be on the side of Justices who have forced political aims on us which undermine our democracy.  I am yours sincerely, Ralph J. Secoy.

    • Beth in OR

      I never want to hear a Supreme Court Justice parroting popular uninformed ideological political positions unless it is followed with the lesson exposing how the positions support existing law, how the positions include fallacies of logic, and to show how such positions exemplify (or do not exemplify) pertinence to the actual case before them. I think SC Justices can certainly educate, but must not  lobby from the bench.

    • Ann M.

      Equating people with corporations which are defined business constructs devalues human beings and devalues the goal of our founding fathers which was to protect the individual.  Please reverse Citizen’s United for the sake of humanity and the value of human life.

    • Richmondsteve

      Citizens United is just the latest in a string of intellectually lazy court rulings dating back to 1886. It’s emblematic of how the United States has been steering off-course for quite some time now.  The solution has to be large and bold: a new Constitutional Convention, per Article 5.  The citizens of this country are not the problem.  Anyone afraid of Article 5 is afraid of the citizenry.

    • Maxwell J Smith

      Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to buy our democracy. If anything, the Citizens United majority nullifies freedom of speech for those most in need of constitutional protection. Please overturn Citizens United.

    • Rev Mary S Harris

      I consider The Citizens United decision to be one of few Supreme Court decisions with which I thoroughly disagree. It is hubris to make a such an important decision based on a century old suit filed by the railroads and a interpretation of that decision written by a clerk to the court. Please correct me if I am incorrect on the basis of the decision. Regardless, this decision has resulted in destroying equity in the political process, the likes of which has not been seen in a very long time. This decision has increased the division in the nation that is already tearing us apart thread by thread and creating an environment that lacks civil discourse. Please consider this plea from a citizen who has voted in every and all elections since I was 18 years old . . . that is over 50 years ago.

    • Louis A. Bleier

      Dear Justices,  Please give the majority of the people the opportunity to elect our representatives. I am tired of an electorate composed of the best money can buy. sincerely yours, Louis A. Bleier

    • Ermcalpine

      This was one of the most blatant Republican-based, “for the good of the few” rulings you have ever passed.  If you have any conscience you will reverse Citizens United and do the right thing for the Democracy, capital D, of this country.  If a large corporation, like Bank of America for instance, is the same as a person then when they do something illegal they should go to jail and if anyone dies as a direct result of their greed then they should get the death penalty… if we go by your ruling…

      This is your chance to undo the ridiculous and return to sanity, in other words… get off the Tea Party bus.

    • Domdsr

      IT IS DISGUSTING THAT BIG CORPORATIONS CAN PORE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO THESE SUPER PACS HIRE LOBBYISTS TO  LOBBY ON CAPITAL HILL AND BUY CONGRESSIONAL FAVOR. THE AVERAGE PERSON HAS NO SAY WHEN UP AGAINST BIG MONEYAND ONE MORE THING IF THE TAX CUT FOR THE RICH CREATE JOBS WHERE ARE THEY? THE BUSH TAX CUTS WAS THE START OF THE PROBLEMS WE ARE HAVING TODAY

    • John Lindamood

      I respectfully ask the Court to reverse Citizens United.  Money in politics is destroying the very fabric of this nation and history will certainly judge us all, the Court, Congress and citizenry, harshly if we permit this cancer to continue.

      John Lindamood
      Columbus, Ohio

    • Sarah & Tom Schirra

      You obviously made a terrible mistake; democrats and republicans now agree. We would think more of you if you would admit it. As it stands now we have LOST ALL RESPECT FOR YOU AND YOUR POSITION. This is really sad for our country and you are squarely to blame. And you know it.

    • Lkienast

      It is heartening to see the Senators, led by Sheldon Whitehouse and John McCain, take the lead in urging you to end Citizens United. By their actions, it is beginning to feel like we have a chance to be America again. It is rare today to see politicians show such honorable behavior by standing with the citizens of this country who have expressed dismay over this dangerous decision to allow corruption through buying elections. How can you not show this same courage to trust in the will of the people rather than the greed of corporations, corrupt politicians, people who can be bought. Please take the high road by ending Citizens United.  

      Sincerely,
      Louise Kienast

    • Sammy

      the fact that we can not trace where this money is coming from should be enough to at lest put some kind of restriction on all pac’s. we must know if campaign money is coming from an outside source. corporations are not people. but if you think they are then they should fall under the same resrictions that people do.

    • Sammy

      what do you think would happen if a pac decided to raise money to start a campaign to have a memeber of the court impeached and you didn’t know where the money was coming from. think about it

    • Suzanne Kreider

      A few wealthy anonymous people should not determine the outcome of an election.  This is despicable and not worthy of the USA.

    • Rebecca Page

      Citizens United has further corrupted our electoral system. Corporations are not people; but, even an individual’s donation is subject to regulations and limitations.  It is absurd to believe that campaigns and political pacs are not coordinating messages. Until corporations can face prison time for election fraud, their participation must be limited.  Unregulated money is not free speech. 

    • Mike Becraft

      What were you thinking!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Glynn

      As an attorney and a citizen, I am horrified by the Citizen’s United decision.  Politicians who owe their elections to big money cannot and will not correct this; the Supreme Court must act to ensure that the true intent of the Constitution is fulfilled.  

      When the founders spoke of free speech, they thought in terms of the rights of individuals, gatherings of citizens and published documents. The founders could not anticipate the power of today’s media and the wealth that could be used to drown out the voices of average citizens. They gave every citizen a vote and they intended to give every citizen a voice.  An equal vote and an equal voice.  To allow individuals of great wealth, corporations which are not endowed by God with inalienable rights and other actors to have voices so loud that all others are drowned out is to subvert the very essence of our democracy!

      The independence of the Supreme Court is the last bastion of defense against threats against our democracy and rights.  Set aside partisanship and set aside pride.  See the inevitable corruption this decision represents and reverse it now.  This is a unique moment in history.  Choose to be the Court that destroyed our democracy or choose to be the Court that saved it.

    • Vicij

      I do not understand how the Supreme Court could sell our democracy to the highest bidders.  Is it your intention to turn the United States into a 3rd world country with only the wealthy able to but our elections.  I am thoroughly disgusted with the Citizens United decision.

    • Sharon Kayne

      Money is not speech. Money is just a means to amplify speech. Not the same thing.

    • Jim

        Politicians, wether Republican, Democratic or Independant can no longer accept these enormous contributions, while letting the contributors remain anonymous. Corporations ARE NOT PEOPLE. Nor can we allow corporations that have controling interests outside these United States make contributions to candidates, corrupting the process in which free and fair elections is based. All campaign contributions should be accounted for. We have an ever increasing disfunctional Congress now because either side is attempting to satisfy their main contributors. 
         We must get the money out of our elections now, before we loss all that is precious and dear in this great nation.     

    • Andrew

      Please do the right thing and reverse this decision. Young Americans do not believe in this system of governance anymore. You need to get the money out of the system so that the trust can be rebuilt. Stop living off the fat of corruption and thinking everything’s okay. It’s not; you’re perpetuating and unjust system and you have the power to stop it. God will judge you harshly for your inaction.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shannon-Hallett/100001404782559 Shannon Hallett

      Your ruling in Citizens United was a distortion of the Law and is directly linked to the “Right Wing Agenda”! Citizens United has taken the power promised by the constitution out of the hands of the people and put it squarely in the hands of the moneyed elite! Your failure to protect citizens against power is a sad state of affairs and failure of the Court to do the job they were created to do! 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shannon-Hallett/100001404782559 Shannon Hallett

      GET MONEY OUT!

    • Birdhaus

      The ruling that is implemented by the Citizens United case is exactly what the Founding Fathers were trying to prevent. If free speech goes to those with the most money, then free speech is a sham. Corporations are not citizens, any more than they are individuals.

    • SOF

      As so many corporations are multi-national, this ruling also allows foreign influence in our elections. !!

    • Rcing29

      After all the people who have sacrificed (blood, sweet & tears)so much for This great nation do you Justices want to go down in history as the ones who squandered it all??????????

    • Charles Atkinson Fox

      “Free speech” does not mean hiding behind an organization’s title, nor does it refer to comments by one person or a small group from any company. Speech is human. Corporation and PACs aren’t.

      Come on!

    • Zyxomma

      I am weary of the false equivalency perpetuated by those on the right (can’t call them conservatives; they don’t deserve the term). They state again and again that the Democratic party receives most of its funding from unions. We all know union membership is down, and union power is nowhere near what it was twenty or thirty years ago. Sure, unions could spend like Koch Brothers or Adelson or vulture capitalist Singer IF they had that kind of money. But they don’t. Citizens United must be rectified by constitutional amendment. As it stands, our democracy is for sale to the highest bidder. Corporations are NOT persons. As my favorite OWS sign said, I’ll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

    • JCS

      We need a country run by a government that is not bought by special interests. It is hard to believe the founding fathers envisioned the current system so corrupted by your Citizens United ruling. No one, not even a Supreme Court Judge, should be empowered to destroy our democracy and take power from the people and give it to the corporations. Money buys politicians and the airways. The empowered corporations use this money to get the laws passed for their interests. J. P. Morgan is a current example of this happening. They could again bring our financial system, or even the global systems, to a near halt because of the unchecked power they wield.

    • Walleyewalt2000

      Citizen’s United has eroded our democracy. Corporations are NOT people. Please do what is right for our country.

    • Rickguidotti

      You were elected by THE PEOPLE to represent THE PEOPLE.
      NOT lobbyists.
      NOT corporations.
      DO YOUR JOB!

    • Toconnor17

      It is unfathomable to me that anyone could consider a corporation to be a single person.  With unlimited funds, which most of us persons DON’T have, corporations can improperly and unfairly influence the campaigns of candidates like no single person can dream of doing.  What’s more, the ability to remain anonymous and fail to disclose the source of such large funds opens the floodgates for the corruption and influence of the candidates who are “beholden” to these corporate donors.  We cannot allow this kind of corrupting influence to continue.  End it now, please.

    • http://www.facebook.com/cecilia.brimmer.1 Cecilia Brimmer

      I am so ashamed of the courts decision to let big money into our politics. I always respected the court system for being just and sensible. I thought we were a great country to not allow this type of corruption to dominate our politics like so many other countries do. Now it seems that even the courts are bought and paid for by big money. You have sold us out to the highest bidder.  This is the very thing our founding fathers fought so hard against. You can still correct this and make it right for the country and the people who are so proud to live here. You can save our democracy and show the rest of the world we are truly a great country where everyone has a voice, or you forever can be known in history, as the court that allowed corruption to overthrow the greatest country in the world. I hope you have seen the damage this law is doing to the common peoples voices. Help us bring back the democracy our founding fathers died for.

    • Bullie47

      It is time to reverse your decision on Citizens United, the sooner the better. This election cycle has sadly proved the critics of this decision more than right. We’ve seen a literal handful of multimillionaires and billionaires contribute unimaginable amounts of money to their candidate of choice, mostly anonymously. We don’t know how much money is coming from foreign donors. This has totally changed the funding of candidates and given some a serious advantage over their opponents. Money from small donors (the American people!!) has become insignificant in this tidal wave of big money. Our elections are being BOUGHT by a handful of millionaires and this is NOT DEMOCRACY! Super Pacs have been able to swamp the traditional money raising organizations. How can corporations be people when an individual can only donate a limited amount while corporations with their record profits can contribute obscene amounts of money. Hardly a comparable situation. Politicians who owe their loyalty to the big donors are NOT going to listen to their constituents, just do the bidding of their big donors, the average citizen be damned.  This is supposed to be a country of, by and for the people, NOT corporations and is NOT what our founding fathers wanted for us. Stop this corruption of our democracy!  

    • Mary S.

      I do not believe this is a partisan issue.  I think both ends of the political spectrum, and everyone in the middle, can come together and on the fact that American’s elections should not be for sale.  I am not a Constitutional scholar, but to me, this goes against the founders’ intent for a free and democratic society.

    • Sherando1

      Your 5-4 decisions of late have been disasters but nothing can compare with this tragedy for democracy called Citizens United. We the citizens are united against this decision and will work tirelessly to tear it down. None of you should be in this kind of position for life. That too much be changed. We the people are angry and will work assiduously overturn this unimaginable decision as soon as possible.

    • Srqbill

      I always thought bribery was illegal but evidently the supreme court has a different view or they just can’t see the forest for the trees. The billionaires and corporations that control these super pacs and run these adds on both sides don’t do it with out getting something in return. By the way when I read the constitution it says we the people maybe you see if you can change that to we the corporations because that is what this country seems to be headed for. Most of the news media is nothing more that a party or corporation mouth peace. Until the money is removed from politics we basically have auctions instead of elections. As a combat vet I have never been Hard right or left I vote what I feel is best for MY COUNTRY. It’s time for the supreme court to be completely bipartisan and repeal the Citizens United ruling and show America you are true Americans.

      Bill Higel
      Sarasota, Florida

    • Sciteacher

      It is incredible to believe that our very government has been taken over by people with the money to influence public opinion.  Your ruling allowing SuperPacs to form and use unlimited amounts of money to influence elections was wrong.  You have the opportunity to correct your error.  Please do so.

    • Stephenperkinsart

      Our elected representatives have become little more than political whores serving those interests that pay them and fund their elections. The American people are not represented by their own government. 

    • braxton55

      The supreme court has lost sight of the american people. These are the kind of decisions that cause citizens to loose respect for the courts. Regardless of their reasoning they had to know, the effect, this would have on the political process. Nothing good has come of this decision. I now believe, the courts should have their arguments and deliberations broadcast so we can better determine what their motivations are.

    • S. Steele

      I want to believe in our democratic system, be alas, it is being taken away by people the American people want to admire and trust .  After your Citizens United decision I have just lost heart.  What has become of our democracy when billionaires decide who will be president?  What added insult to injury was watching Justice Alito’s mouthing his beliefs at, of all places, the State of the Union Address.  I expected more from you.  I would support congression changes that would overrule this unfair and wrongheaded decision.  This decision is WRONG, please correct it.

    • Boconnnorsims

      you have made a terrible decision that continues to hurt our democracy

    • Biglake1

      It is my understanding that Citizens United has allowed Super PAC’s to receive unlimited anonymous donations from Corporations, Unions, Special interest Groups and the very wealthy.  I have major concerns with this.  It is a concern of mine that non citizens or their Governments will have influence on our political process and that their goals may not be the best for our nation or our citizens.  I am also aware that a Corporations goals may be different than the well being of our masses.  It is my concern that the very wealthy should also not have a louder voice than any other citizen.  In my opinion, the only fair way for our Country to be “For the People, By the People”  is for only People to be allowed to fund elections and that limits be made as to how much they can donate.  At bare minimum, there should be accountability as to who is funding which Super PAC and in what amount.  We should know which Corporations, Unions, and Special interest groups have funded what Super PAC and how much was donated.  I am an investor and I feel it is important for me to know how much money a company I am invested in is paying out for political action.  Squandering large amounts of Corporate money to try and influence an election is not a Company I would like to invest in.    

    • Bill49259

      It is heart breaking to know our Supreme Court has sunk so low as to allow money to corrupt our Government in this way.They should hang their heads in shame because they will go down in history with this following their name and their family’s name.

    • Nancy Vitale

      If we the people need to report and are restricted in the amount of money we can donate for political candidates, then those donating to Super Pacs should also have to be named and amount of donation listed for all to know.  

    • Country doctor

      Jefferson and Hamilton worked out that we are a representative republic. We now are in a society where one man, one vote can no longer be the rule of the land, when corporations can buy so much influence that the individuals no longer count.
      Please abolish Citizens United’s effect of allowing corporations to donate without full public exposure and limits on them.

    • Nanc Dillon

      The 2012 presidential election will be blatantly bought. It’s dispicable that so-called “issue PACs” can produce commercials that are so obviously NOT issue-related but underhanded ads aimed at ruining a political opponent, and it’s all legal because they don’t use the word “vote.” We’re not stupid, and I have a lot of confidence that the majority of American cannot and will not be bought or tricked. The whole situation is shameful.

    • Pyacuk

      This decision was a mistake.  You need to admit your mistake and reverse this decision.

    • Norman Burke

      I learned in school about 3 branches of gov’t with balance of power. Now there’s a 4th branch. The corporations. No more balance of power. The Constitution devised by our founding fathers has been terribly corrupted by the very thing the F.F’s were afraid of, MONEY! Our so called “representatives” no longer represent their constituents. In proportion to how much of the taxpayer’s money they give away to help the “too Big To Fail” corporations rape “The People” even more and to snuff out smaller competition, our so called representatives are not only whores, they’re the cheap 3 dollar crack whore on the corner. They get a couple thousand, 10′s of thousands or 100′s of thousands from a corp and the corp benefits by BILLIONS! Yes, cheap crack whores. Who determines energy policy in America? Energy companies! (Don’t forget those big Agri-corn growers with the biggest farce foisted on America ever, Ethinol!) In their financial interests only. Never “For The People!” Who dictates monetary policy? The Federal Reserve (which is neither Federal nor a reserve) and the Too Big to Fail banksters. Who determines supply, quality and pricing of our food? Big Agri-business. They get billions in subsidies to help ruin our food and put the family farmer out of business! Health care? Insurance companies and big Pharama. And the worst of all? The Military Industrial Complex. As long as they have our politicians by the short hairs, we as a nation WILL be at WAR,SOMEWHERE in the world, without cause, FOREVER!!! Why would our Supreme Courts go down this same road? Are they also so short sighted that they cannot realize that the same country they help destroy today is the same country that their children and grandchildren will have to grow up and live in. In this ever shrinking global community, do they really think there’s a better place to hide? Besides, they might be called the “Honorable” Judge or Congressman or whatever, NOW. But things change. Remember what happened to the Czar and his family in Russia when they were overthrown? What makes these fools believe that they and theirs will be insulated and protected forever? Things Change! Why would our Supreme Court work so hard to destroy America?

    • YodaNole

      This is the single most critical action that must be taken to preserve our system of government as, of the people, for the people, and by the people.  We can’t afford to let our government become a plutocracy as we sit by and watch, because the wealthy have no idea what is good for the rest of us.  When we left England, we rejected that serfdom and the feudal system that supported it.  It must not be allowed to rear its ugly head again.  Citizen’s United leaves us in a predicament where any foreign individual can buy our government without our knowledge.  No matter how you excuse it, that ain’t right.

    • EmmyPat

      I believe the Citizens United decision by SCOTUS will undermine our democracy in the quickest and most destructive manner ever conceived. It must be overturned if the U.S.A. is to stand as a leader among the nations of the world. It is insanity to affirm the buying of our elections, and it has nothing to do with Republicans and Democrats and Moderates. Every citizen will be a victim of this debacle ultimately.

    • Mark David Nicholas

      Corporations are not citizens and they certainly are not people.

      Corporations do not deserve any “Rights of Man”, they do not deserve any “Human Rights”, they do not deserve any “Political Rights”.

      Corporations are only tools to be used by us and for us. We are. They are not. We are a country and government “of the People, for the People, by the People.”

      The only thing they truly have is the right to sign financial contracts and what they truly must have are responsibilities and obligations.

      The enemy has crossed the Rubicon, they have usurped our government and all of our rights. We all have become subjected to not even tyrants, but to inhuman soulless entities.

      As captives and slaves, truly we would have better luck arguing and appealing to the humanity of Hannibal Lecter, than we would with these entities that do not have and could never have any humanity.

      Who will throw these money changers out of our temple? Who will throw these armies out our republic.

      We must rescind all the artificial and unjust rights of Corporations and we must enforce their true responsibilities and obligations. We must hold all Corporate Officers and Board Members accountable and liable for both the civil and criminal violations of their Corporations and they must be punished to the fullest extent of the law whatever that is, even if it means life in prison or the death penalty. If their minions do the crime they must do the time.

      And all those folks that transferred and sold our God given Inalienable Rights to inhuman Corporations must be held accountable, they must be impeached and tried for the treason of selling our country and government to inhuman, international and foreign interests. Impeach the Supreme Court and take back our government “of the People, for the People, by the People.”

    • RealityCheck

      Are you kidding me? The Supreme Court has one purpose – to interpret the Constitution. The Court was not intended to legislate from the bench. Any Justice who might be swayed by petitions or public opinion is truly not worthy of sitting on the Court. This effort to get the Court to reverse the decision is misguided to say the least. Why not call it what it really is – an effort to fire up the base and to vilify another entity; the Court, corporations, business, insurance companies. What a bunch of cry babies!

      • Jackies2s

        The base is already fired up.  I certainly am not trying to vilify the court.  This ruling, however, has been a disaster and threatens our democracy.  This action (the outcry of the public, speaking out for each person) may not sway the court now but it does make a difference.  Citizens United will be added to the list of reversed court decisions. You are the one who sounds like a cry baby!

      • Sue Ann

        Yet it’s fine for their “interpretation” of the Constitution to be bought and paid for. Legislate from the bench is exactly what they did and exactly what we’re all complaining about, and no, I’m not kidding.

      • Guest

        That is a bizarre interpretation of “reality”.  The “Citizens United” ruling is the epitome of unconstitutional legislating by the Court.  Where in the Constitution is legally limited commercial speech equated with protected free speech by citizens?

      • Guest

        We’re not crying.  We’re rising up.

      • republicanindetox

        “The Court was not intended t legislate from the bench.”  Yet this is exactly what they did in “Citizens United”.  With one 5/4 vote, my rights were legislated, restricted and my voice silenced.  What more powerful legislation can there be than to completely undermine the constitution which they are supposed to “interpret”?

    • MMORPGer

      This was a simple Carl Rove/Koch Brothers coup to take control of our country.  “Supreme” Court Justice Clarence Thomas was even paid for his support, he made the vote and his wife cashed the check–FACT!  This country is going toward becoming a 3rd world country; it already has the income disparity of one.  Just remember to bow and kiss the feet of your all powerful rich overlord and everything will be fine; unless they can make any profit by getting rid of you then well kiss it goodbye.

    • Sue

      I have always believed that every one is equal ithe USA. But with your ruling on Citizens United you have devalued anyone who is not a Corp. There is no way that we can be heard over the money and power of the corp. We Pay our Taxes as the Laws state but because of the Influence of Corp. The are able to write laws to exempt them selves from paying any taxes.

    • Lspurser

      Citizens United was a tragic decision which violates the very ideas that this country was founded upon–a government supposedly “by the People, for the People”  No more, thanks to SCOTUS.  Reverse the decision now and keep large corporations and ‘anonymous’ donors from buying our elections!

    • Carolyn

      Dear Justices:

      I have to believe you did not realize at the time how  destructive your decision would be to our
      political process when you made the Citizens United decision. But you must
      certainly realize it now. Just look at what’s happened to our political process
      since then. All it takes is a few people wealthy enough and willing to put up
      enough money, and they can actually buy an election — city, state, or federal.
      How disgraceful and how sad that our proud American system has fallen to this.
      We can no longer say we are a government 
      “of the people, by the people and for the people.” So sad indeed. Please,
      you must reverse Citizens United.

    • Gebunce

      I quote Aristotle from his “Politics”; “It is surely a bad thing that the greatest offices should be bought. The law which permits this abuse makes wealth of more account than ability, and  the whole state becomes avaricious.”

    • mary paquette

      Of the people, by the people and for the people.  Not of the corporations, by the corporations or for the corporations. Not of the Koch brothers, by the Koch brothers or for the Koch brothers.

    • cesar

      You hold our freedom in your vote.  Vote for to end “Citizens United”, and show that you still believe that “We the People” will always mean, We the PEOPLE.

    • Mathgeek3_14

      I’m so tired of the elitist buying all the votes. It’s time to listen to the majority & science. It is really scary how $ has taken over the government, not only congress but the FDA. Have heart and be for the people not the dollar.
      ………………………

    • Betty Brock

      IT IS A DISGRACE TO HEAR SENATORS AND JUDGES TALKING AND TAKING PART IN CORRUPTION SUCH AS THE SUPREME COURTS UNREGULATED ELECTIONS. THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SHAME IN POLITICS ANYMORE.  CORRUPTION SEEM TO NOW BE THE NORM. IT SEEM TO BE OK TO LIE AND DESTROY PEOPLES CHARACTER JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN. HEAVEN HELP US AS A DEMOCRACY, WE CANNOT CONTINUE ON THE ROAD WE ARE ON. WHEN WILL THE POLITICIANS BE FORCED TO AT THE LEAST BE HONEST WITH “WE THE PEOPLE”. ITS LONG OVERDUE.  

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=530420582 Maggie Callahan

      When so  many voters only get their information from mainstream media and do not research much on their own, he with the most money, wins. What does that mean? They with the most money to throw around, to lose, to spend, WIN. It doesn’t matter what their candidate stands for or plans to do for the people, it is about keeping the corporation happy and profitable. There will never be true reform in this country of ANY kind unless we get campaign finance reform, we cannot hope to ever win the race when it is fixed from the starting pistol. 

    • John Harvell

      Dear Supreme Court Justices,

      I do not and cannot understand the logic you used when you decided your rulings in regards to Citizens United vs The FEC. Corporations are not people. WALMART cannot enter a voting booth and CAST a VOTE! Your RULING allows organizations to BULLY AND BRIBE their way into POLITICAL POWER! Some of you argue that “If you do not allow corporations (Domestic & foreign) to be able to spend unlimited amounts of money will somehow limit the freedom of speech.” Is that what our Dear Nation is all about, Greed! Is that the story you want us to tell to our children about how the evil supreme court corrupted the American Spirit?! Just Un-Do a hundred years of Precedent so that a hand full of house holds in America can do VERY, VERY GOOD. Ah the American deam… GONE.

      Sincerly,
      John Harvell

    • Laura Rose

      All individual U.S. citizens associated in any way with corporations already, before the ”Citizens United” ruling, had the right to use their own money to support candidates.  They were also able to join others w/ similar political beliefs in not-for-profit issue-oriented groups to learn the positions of members of Congress regarding the groups’ focal issues.  In contrast, the financial support of for-profit corporations for candidates is very different from free speech in two ways: 1) the money is being used without the consent of most of its owners, and 2) the laws of incorporation specify that resources of for-profit corporations must be used solely to advance the profitability of the corporation, making any political speech it sponsors, in effect, commercial speech, very different in quality from the much more varied and nuanced opinions of the members of its mgmt. and shareholders.  Thus the ruling is giving the force of law to a type of political activity that not only is not protected in the Constitution, but which actually overwhelms the free speech that is.

      Since the ruling, it’s become clear that members of Congress are too intimidated by the power of such large blocs of money to even attempt to follow the suggestions of the Court to require detailed disclosure of the source of campaign funds.  This extreme imbalance of influence on the legislators has led to a clearly unconstitutional outcome.  It is now possible for a candidate to benefit from huge amounts of undisclosed, foreign financial support to the disadvantage of an opposing candidate running only w/ money collected transparently from U.S. citizens.

    • Seamusfamous13

      Let’s be clear:  Corporations have ALL the power in our democracy today.   We have sold our freedom to the highest bidder.  What would the Founding Fathers say about Citizens United?

    • Johnaponick

      Citizens United equated the amount a corporation spends with free speech in financing political campaigns. I am sure you know this. A result of this thinking has been that unrestrained spending gives corporations unrestrained influence. You may want to assume that when very well financed ads through corporate spending for candidates are shown on television, and heard radio more frequently, voters are able to better make choices. The fact that the others side has less money and thus fewer opportunities to present their message denies voters of a real choice. Many more voters rely of television and radio for information. Persons contribute money to get a message across. A corporation is not a citizen. It may have an opinion. It also has a larger single entity pool of money. This is not equal to equal to all citizens and makes Citizens United a wrong decision. Please strike it down to preserve our republic.

    • Walt Daniels

      We the people say you are wrong!

    • Ed Bruce

      It seems “we” have reached our summit decades ago. As countries around the world develope into societies like we once were, we are in a downward spiral with a repeat of Roman times in sight. Corruption rules at all levels. Integrity is now looked at as naivety. Shame on our government!

    • Chuckpugh65

      Citizens United is a misnomer, actually we are the REAL Citizens United, united against the U.S. Supreme court decision to allow
      big money to buy our elected officials thereby taking away our fundamental right to elect candidates based on their beliefs, positions on issues and their veracity. I am embarrassed by such a misguided SCOTUS. It is imperative that the court reconsider their decision!

    • John orosz

      I sure wish I was a millionaire so I could stuff my millions into politicians campaigns and lobby groups but sadly I am an average American who is afforded RIGHTS found within the constitution. If we are in deed operating from some other form ofd paperwork why do we give any credence to the founding fathers documents and the wishes of so many across the land? Let’s just establish a nation controlled by the richest corporations and call it what it is at that point.

    • Carolynkw119

      No, no, no. Corporations are NOT people. They are for-profit entities whose main focus is on their bottom line. They do not represent me when I need health care. They do not build better schools for my grandchildren. They do not volunteer as I do at a cancer center. They do not laugh and cry and plan and worry about every citizen’s daily life. They spend their money where it will help them. They should not elect my President or even my state representative. Please reverse this ill-conceived and oft-abused  campaign finance ruling now!

    • Heike & Bruce Kholooci

      Free speech and one’s voice should not be quantifiable or expandable.
      If, according to “Citizens United”, money equals free speech, it follows that
      people with more money have more free speech. How can that still be called a
      democracy?

    • Michael Sibner

      Citizens United allows wealthy people who want to influence the various branches of government to contribute
      unlimited amounts of money to influence elections.

    • Kathycooklee

      Our system of government is corrupt.  Unlimited speech by corporations has fueled the corruption.  Corporations are run by people but they are not people.  Everyone learns about the injustice of the Dred Scott case when in grade school.  This current Robert’sSupreme Court Justices will be remembered for the injustice of equating corporations to people and allowing the corporations the use of unlimited funds to tamper with elections. 

    • Hclcsc

      For the first time in my sixty years of life this present group of supreme court justices remind us that our justice system remains flawed! The frailties of mans greed and biases always seem to rise to the top in all civilizations and ours is no exception! C’Mon Jesus we need some true justice on this earth!

    • DeminWauk

      My grandparents were Italian immigrants.  They worked so hard and risked so much to give us a better opportunity than they had by coming to America.  Unfortunately, we’ve come full circle and Citizens United has returned mus to the same feudal system they fled.  Money is power and the richest ones rule.  Who will be the first King? 

    • Russ Sernau

      Get the money out of politics.  Is this what fighting all these wars for freedom has ended up?

    • From America

       A  February 2010 a ruling by Justice Roberts and the US Supreme Court concerning “Citizens United” allowed the Corporate Globalization of the US Election System giving rich American and foreign Elite the right to vote hundreds of thousands of times… by proxy…. with unlimited amounts of their dollars…. thereby forever influencing the outcome of all American elections. The US Chamber of Commerce will directly/indirectly receive vast amounts of the unmarked funds as will other special interest groups/Pac’s with fancy names. They will filter the money down to federal, state, city, county and judicial elections without disclosing the donor. The states, courts, Congress and US Government now belong to World Elites, International Corporations and K-Street… not its pseudo voter’s or population.  
      The Roberts led Supreme Court ruling concerning “Citizen United” has forever changed American Democracy.  It effectively neutralized 99% of all individual Americans political contribution and vote by giving American to the Worlds “richest Elite.”  
      It’s not a Democracy that rules… its Fascism… a “World Corporatism” as America’s been sold to the highest bidder.

    • Bjtaggart

      When the “Citizens United ” decision came down we the people looked up in disbelief and saw the tears rolling down the cheeks of “Lady Liberty” as she stands beside the “Golden Door” and weeps. What would cause this previously hallowed court to make a decision that causes us to actually hurt inside? God save us from the likes of these people.

    • Elisabeth bersin

      THIS amount of money, made available by Citizens United, is a criminal involvement in our political process. It gives individuals
      and companies with massive resources the power VOTE IN MY PLACE!
      I am distraught about this perversion because I vote in EVERY election!

    • L. Jacobson

      The United States was founded on the principal of equal protection for all. This country is at risk of becoming a third world country because of rulings like Citizens United which consistently favors the wealthy and corporate interest over those who increasingly are marginalized. Without limiting corporate money the rights and access for ALL for essential services like healthcare, education and environmental protection are becoming overshadowed by special interests. Stop the purchasing of elected officials now.

    • From America

      Justice Roberts… we’ve figured it out…

      As the CEO’s and Elite get richer…. gaining more control over our government and lives….  And as Face book type start-up companies mint more instant million and billionaires the Elite continue to marginalize the other 99% of Americans. 

      Since your US Supreme Court revisited an obscure late 1800 California Supreme Court railroad case and issued a new ruling called “Citizens United” which said “corporations have the same rights as people”…. allowing corporations anywhere in the World with a one room office in USA to contribute unlimited amounts of cash to any USA election. This money filters down to local Federal, state, county, city and judicial elections via US Chamber of Commerce and other groups/pac’s with funny sounding patriotic names.  The money is used to buy elections, Congressmen, governors, state representatives, judges, commissioners, councilmen and mayors etc..

      We get it Roberts….. a select group of your backers…”billionaires” now owns America.

    • Bill

      This is THE most disturbing decision that the Supreme Court has made during my 6+ decade life. It is highly partisan, wrong-headed and destructive to democracy in my opinion. 

      Clearly one can construct an elegant legal argument to support many positions. Positions both very good and very bad for the country can be fashioned from the same cloth. Thus in final analysis, some issues come down to doing the right thing.

      I understand that “the right thing is often a matter of opinion”. But I find it deeply troubling that the strict constructionists on the Court took a position in Citizens United that one can barely fathom was in the minds of the founding fathers. Moreover, there is no doubt it was not in the minds of the legislators who passed McCain Feingold nor the judges who set the precedent in this area of the law prior the the decision of the Roberts court.

      Each justice swore an oath that morally binds him/her to do the right thing for the country. How can free speech by the individual be drowned out by the muscle of corporate coffers in the name of free speech? Is this not the ultimate irony? Is this not conservative cronyism at its worst? Why am I reminded of Bush v. Gore, and why am I so disgusted by the mockery that this court has made of an institution I once so respected.

      To the Justices: You make the Congress look dignified. Don’t get too caught up in the pomp and circumstance of your robes. You have failed to defend democracy at its core. Tell yourselves what you might, but you will take this to your grave.

      • GEna

        Amen!!!

    • Gtbecker

      I am a self-employed professional engineer with an MS that is licensed in 5 states.  I have worked and been fully taxed since I was 16 years old.  I am 54 and  I am a small disadvantaged business that must continually struggle to provide a future for my wife and three children.  I live with the fact that the government classifies my company with essentially no overhead waste in the same size category as engineering businesses that have annual revenues of 14 to 35 million.   I am horrified by how much government money is going to huge inefficient, wasteful corporate giants with huge marketing and lobbying budgets?  This is not an even playing field and it cannot be leveled until bribery is removed from the process.  

      This corporate domination through influence of our government has been prompted by greed in our politicians.  This has caused a government based only mainly money, which breeds corruption and causes huge misjudgments in regulation.  Capitalizm itself is not the root of the problem as it is only an invented system to streamline progress and quality output through fair competion.  However, mixing business with government has resulted in lack of fair competition, poor decisions and poor products. No wonder we are at the point of bankruptcy.  If the government must use the private sector then level the playing field by elliminating lobbying, stop the waste in the contracts they have and eliminate all non essential future work that is not crucial to our long term survival.

      Admittedly, goverment is important, but not in creating or participating in more capatalizm.   Government is to protect and nurture the things that raw capatalizm is not designed to protect.  For example, government must protect the long range survivability of the human race, which means is must protect the long range survivability of the earth or find another place to populate.  There are other examples of non-profitable good things like preventing deaths from poverty, gaining higher knowledge and promoting conservation to give us time to grow up.  These are not profitable from any short term perspective and cannot be handled by pure capitalizm.  Human greed and related temptation will not go away for a long time, but we can move in the right direction by removing that temptation from our officials to produce officials that are dedicated to higher, longer term goals.   Removing the big money (including eventually the huge, preferential benefits packages) from our government will also remove many unaccountable workers from this bloated system.  Taking money out of the government creates conditions where it will eventually limit itself.   

      Take the money out, its the only place to start.  Nothing will change until we move in this direction.

    • RonK

      Corporationss are not people!  They cannot enter a voting booth as such, yet the U.S. Supreme Court decision in regard to “Citizens United” gives them undo influence in every election at the Federal level through the State level.  The degree to which” big money ” influences our political process as well as the legal system is nothing short of shameful.

    • Carolyn Gergen

      Please everyone, spread the word, we’ve got to turn this around.

    • Necannon1

      I feel like the Supreme Court has taken away my vote and the votes of all ordinary people and handed them over to a few very wealthy and powerful people who will now be using their money and influence to call the shots. This was a horrible decision and needs to be reversed. I can’t believe that the justices are not embarrassed by what they have brought to the country with their decision. 

    • Michael Brown

      Corporations are not people.  Money is not speech.  Consolidations of money have no constitutional rights.

      Whatever happened to the idea of a corporate founding charter?  One that defines the real human goals of providing a good or service to people, and employing them in a fair and humane way.  Profits should be shared by the people who worked to earn them, not just investors.  All our values should be based on human ones.

      Throughout history, we have learned that money and power will accumulate in fewer and fewer hands without a checking mechanism.  A middle class is not naturally occurring; it must be created and nurtured to exist.

      The Citizens United decision was a huge leap backward toward the consolidation of power and money in a few hands, with a 99% of humanity scratching and clawing to exist in service to the King. 

    • Fred Boesl

      Your decision brought the end of a once proud country of humans.
      And made it a conglomerate of corporations. 
      I hope you are proud.
      Now pick the corporate logos that are going to replace the stars in your flag.
      The United Corporations of America. 
      Shame on you! What did your soul cost?

    • roselockwood

      I live in Montana, where we learned from our history the destructive power of money in politics. Corruption through political spending DOES happen, and it DID happen in the period of the “Copper Kings” in Montana when political office was bought and sold like any other commodity by the mining interests in our state. We had a referendum, and the people of our state voted in the Corrupt Practices Act. Our rules do not prevent corporate interests from being involved in politics, but we do (or at least we did, before you intervened) impose some controls on what super-rich people can do, and how they can do it. 
      The unrestrained Super PACs enable very rich people from who knows where to influence politicians, and legislation, in secret, with no accountability to the people of our country, not to mention the vicious campaigns they fund on behalf of their political clients. THE IDEA THAT THIS DOES NOT ENGENDER CORRUPTION IS UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. Everybody in the country knows this is true and it is probably the one thing that people of all political persuasions can agree on – a “Super Majority” of us believe Super PACS should be illegal. 

      The American people are losing faith in our democracy and it is your fault. You need to correct the scandalous Citizens United decision. When fewer than 100 people control 80% of the money that is funding our political process, something is more than seriously wrong, it is a disaster for our democracy. You have a constitutional obligation to return the country to its citizens. 

      I am not a legal scholar, but I know enough about our constitution and our system of government to be confident that “constitutional protections” were intended for minorities who suffer injustice at the hands of the majority, not for minorities who inflict injustice on the majority. Please do your duty, or resign.

    • BIGDADDYSIRCJ

      IF COPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE, THEN WHY DO THEY HAVE A LOWER TAX RATE THAN OTHERS? IF CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE, THEN WHY THEY ONLY PAY FINES WHEN THEY COMMIT CRIMES, BUT OTHER FOLK GO TO PRISON?

    • Philip Diehl

      Your decision in Citizens United is an excellent example of why the Supreme Court should not legislate from the bench. Your inexperience and naivete regarding contemporary electoral politics has poured jet fuel on the corrupting fire of money in politics. You have decisively tilted elections in favor of the wealthy and corporate interests by confusing their money with speech, allowing them to manipulate the political process by dominating the marketplace of ideas with all the tools of modern propaganda: public relations, advertising, and media ownership, and “thought leadership”. Combined with the decision in Bush v Gore, Citizens United makes it abundantly clear that the Court is now a partisan institution determined to extend the power of the Republican Party and its social Darwinist policies. In doing so, you have delegitimized the Court and weakened our democratic institutions.

      • Nnnooccc

        Well done.

    • Spokomojo

      When Texas executes a corporation, then I’ll believe the they are human – not until!  We all know thatthe power of our government is supposed to have equal power between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches, yet the Supremes have ALL the juice.   The ‘Citizens’ supreme court ruling, that throws holy water on more and more money being the deciding factor in our elections continues to be the most troubling aspect of a government sliding into an abyss.  When corporate America can purchase election(s), we are defined as an Oligarchy, and we’ll soon become no better that the Robber Barons of medieval Europe. 
       
      The decisions of the Roberts Court has morphed the country into a world in which corporations are now human and can donate hundreds of millions even billions of dollars.  Stare Decisis can cram itself!  Right now, 94% of our winners are decided by who has the most money!!  The FDA requires that shampoo bottles have a truthful list of ingredients, but those that are elected to the highest office in our country?  We’ve become a third world banana republic!

      • sconn

        I believe we should await the next misguided and political ruling from the Supreme Court to declare us a confirmed “banana republic”.  Maybe this is simply a nightmare and a republic/democracy does still exist.  I doubt we would elect 99% of the politicians if their ingredients were known to us.

    • republicanindetox

      When the Supreme Court determined that corporations were people and money was speech, every individual citizen of this country lost their voice in a government intended to be formed for the benefit and rights of its citizenry.  Corporations are concrete and money is property.  How could a body of people appointed to the court to protect the rights of the flesh and blood people of this country be so misguided as to sell out to the highest bidders?  This is treason to any kind of justice that members of the court are sworn to uphold.  Corporations do not hold citizenship, they are global entities supporting the economy of other countries by exporting jobs overseas and across our boarders.  They benefit from this country, but give nothing back.  It’s time
      to end this odious decision.  Past time.  It should have never happened, had justice truly been served.

    • NoMoneyForVotes

      The Citizens United is probably the greatest judicial perversion of the Constitution yet. When a corporation is arrested, tried and jailed then the claim might have a bit of validity, but even then it would be tenuous at best. The people who are employed by corporations are due all the rights and protections afforded them by the Constitution. The corporate structure itself has no objective existence. The Founding Fathers were certainly aware of this. What part of the following do you fail to understand?

      “I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.” – Thomas Jefferson

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1495877996 David Baker

      Citizens United is a pure legal perversion of the Constitution. It’s removal from law needs to be at the forefront of  legislation to reform congress. Remove the money from the equation. One person, one vote. Not one legally defined person, votes weighted by money. Don’t let our country become; One corporation, deregulated, under god, with liberty and
      justice as defined by the corporate bylaws for all.

    • Mike Tucker

      I beg the court for the sake of our democracy that it reconsider its opinion in the Citizens United case.  Corporations are not people. They are not citizens. They have no voting rights. They do not deserve identical rights as living breathing citizens. They do not bear the same responsibilities of citizenship as living breathing citizens. Nor do they bear the same risks and outcomes of living breathing citizens. The court has expended the scope and breath of free speech beyond that ever envisioned by the founding fathers and embodied in our constitution. The monied interests of the few have overtaken and clouded the judgement of those who have sworn themselves faithful to the constitution and impartiality in its interpretation. Restoration of the court’s credibility requires reversal of Citizens United.   

    • John Ferreiro

      If you allow this dangerous law to remain it will be the downfall of America and history will condemn you.

    • Beverly Wallace

      We, the 99%, are tired of being ignored, and ripped from our rights day by day! In quoting a
      famous character named Beale, every American, after reading this should be
      shouting from the rooftops,

      “I’m mad as hell and I’m not gonna take it anymore!” Money is shared among only those who already have it and want more leaving us (the 99%) going wanting for even the basics of living and life. Money is used to gain more power for them and less rights for US. This is not acceptable!

    • Dee_adamick

      Restore Democracy “OF the People, BY the People, FOR the People”……for Individuals, NOT corporations!

    • Jacquelyn Judd

      I believe that giving corporations personhood disenfranchised the majority of American citizens. including me. I am a disabled senior citizen, and I think I have no influence at all in selecting the presidential or congressional candidates because I have a low income. My generation (the baby boomers) is retiring and will be joining me as the disenfranchised. I can’t help but feel it is the intention of the Supreme Court to not allow us to be part of American politics. This is not democracy, and the United States of America is no longer a democratic society.

    • Robert Adler

      In a democracy, we are each given ONE vote.  If money is considered a form of speech, it means that a person with a lot of money has a much bigger say on our electoral system than a person with no money.  By spending unlimited amounts of money, they can virtually block any competing thoughts and voices.  A vivd democracy thrives on having dissenting voices, and allowing the people to choose between the ideas expressed.  By giving the wealthy and the corporations a greater say in the electoral process, you are de facto creating a two class system – the landed gentry and the serfs.  If our founding fathers had that in mind, they would have devised a system whereby the number of votes a person had was determined by his wealth.

      • scon

        Reminds me of our history when only landed (money) free white men were allowed a vote.  As you state, “the number of votes a person had was determined by his wealth”. 

    • Beverley

      Five men on the court took my voice.  You five disefranchised all individuals just as George Orwell predicted.

      • Larkspur

        And five billionaires will take our vote.

    • scon

      Citizen’s United decreed a corporation is a person.  I am am person and therefore a corporation?  If so where are my corporate financial gains, privileges, lobbyists, loop holes, et al.  I believe that equating the current Current Supreme Court with ALICE IN WONDERLAND would be true justice.

    • J5-e3

      Corruption has permeated our system of government from the
      beginnings of this nation. The corruption has been exacerbated by court
      decisions through the years that are based on precedence. The basis for the
      misguided decision in “Citizens United” that further extends human rights to
      corporations can be traced to corruption in the court system in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific
      Railroad, (1866).  That case was
      about taxation of railroad fence lines, but justices at the time decided, either
      by malfeasance or misfeasance, to grant human rights under the “equal protection clause” of the
      Fourteenth Amendment to the artificial person, Southern Pacific Railroad. The Fourteenth
      Amendment, enacted during reconstruction following the civil war was intended
      to protect the citizenship of blacks, especially former slaves and not the “citizenship”
      of corporations. It is perfectly clear and logical to most people
      who can read, that the Fourteenth Amendment was written for human persons as
      citizens and not artificial persons (corporations). “All
      persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
      jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
      wherein they reside.”  So how
      could current Justices not understand that corporations aren’t and can’t be “citizens?”
       Corporations are neither “born” nor “naturalized”
      in the United States. They are created by humans as a legal entity called an
      artificial person by receiving a charter from the State in which they are
      organized. The current Supreme Court can reverse the precedence that has given “artificial persons”
      human rights. And the current Supreme Court can also help reduce corruption
      in our election process by reversing their “Citizens United” decision. But in
      either case don’t hold your breath, given the politics of the court these days.
      It will take more than words to reverse this nations slide toward becoming a “Banana
      Republic.”

      Jim Chiddix

      • Jerry Lopez, CSUN 1976

         Answer – Partisan politics – The “Justices” were bought and paid for by the GOP

    • BAB

      Money = Free Speech = Oppression

    • Aedisen

      The Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission decision will destroy our democracy.  Corporations cannot be, nor can they be, people with the right to vote as citizens.  The legalized fictional “persons” created by this decision should not be allowed to create  an oligarchy/plutocracy/dictatorship by corrupting our democracy.   In a democracy it is one person, one vote.

    • can’t take it anymore

      Citizens United is just the latest decision that contributes to the corruption of our political system. There is no way the founders of this great nation would have agreed to accept lobbying an elected official for any reason. Until we get rid of “career politicians” and the corrupt system (lobbying) that allows our elected officials to be bought we will continue to struggle as a nation. The most significant change that can’t be done fast enough would be term limits for the Congress, the Senate and the memebrs of the Supreme Court. The highest position in the land, the presidency, is limited to eight years why the hell would any other position be different?

      • GEna

        I agree with you, term limits would help and we need younger people in these positions to lead this country to greatness again. The Koch Brothers founded ALEC with one purpose, so the 1% could rule the 99%. That is called a Dictatorship. ALEC is Citizens United, and we have the best polititions money can buy and the supreme court too. Alot of the rich and rich corporations left ALEC when we the people threatened to stop buying their products. They need to wise up and we need to backup our resolve to get our country back.

    • Barbara Reed89

      The Citizens United decision has taken the democratic process out of our democracy. The American people have one voice and one wallet while while large coorporations have multiple voices and multiple wallets. The inequality is obvious and astounding. The Citizens United decision was a mistake and it needs to be taken down. Don’t compound it by not listening to the American people.

    • Gerald_knafel

       The one thing i want to say is Citizens United completly lacks common sense.  In no way can anyone show how a corporation is a person. We, the people had better wake up or corporations will own the goverment, if they dont allready. I never thought I needed protected from the SUPREME COURT decisions.

    • Pemjmadden

      I live in Annapolis, MD.  There are 40,000 people and if each gave $100 to a campaign, this would be $4M and you would need 4 towns like Annapolis to equal what Sheldon Adelson give to Newt Gingrich.  That is not democracy.

    • JerHag

      We have always known or at least suspected that corporations rule this county — with the Citizens United ruling it was simply made official.  It takes a getting sucker punched sometimes to wake us up.  Are “we the people” ready to take back our country? I will be a long fight.

    • Kvbazzle

      What’s so disturbing in my mind is the Supreme Courts williness to go down in history as the people who destroyed Democracy

      .

    • Larkspur

      How can it be called “Citizens United” when citizens are being totally left out of the process?  One billionaire contribution represents 30,000 small contributions.  Maybe the media outlets could stop taking ads with no disclosure.

    • advocatefordemocracy

      When Citizens United became law, it moved in exactly the opposite direction from benefitting American citizens.  There was already unacceptable influence being bought from Congress by corporate interests, and the Citizens United ruling opened the floodgates, dumping money on an already corrupt Congress.  No government employee, elected or hired, should ever be allowed under the law to accept any gift, monetary or otherwise.  Military personnel already live with such lawful constraints; why shouldn’t lawmakers?  Enforce the spirit of the Constitution and give the government back to the people.  How could you have created a system in which a political party needs to spend a billion dollars to elect a president, thus becoming indebted to the interests of corporate CEOs and the extremely wealthy?  Let’s start over and get it right this time.  

    • opstunned

      Citizens United is the most dangerous move against our democracy in our history. We have watched and criticized and even waged wars against other countries who allowed this kind of corruption to freedom.  We’ve all read the history books – this is how it starts – powerful groups begin controlling the government.  And we know it ends in revolution by the people.  Take us forward, not backward.  Take us toward democracy, not corporatocracy.  Nothing is more corrupting of “By the people, for the people” than Citizens United. Nothing is more eroding of our democracy than Citizens United. Honor the people who died fighting for our freedom by reinstating people as the power in our government.  This is your legacy.

    • Bradhenry

      The Citizens United decision has to be ranked as one of the worst in US history.  Repeal it before it can do further damage to our democracy.  What were you thinking?

    • Winters

      Citizens United did not
      just give corporations the same rights as people, it basically gave
      corporations the right to drown out the rights of real people with unlimited,
      dirty and anonymous money. This narrow 5-4 Supreme Court decision is a great
      threat to democracy, and an endorsement of government of the corporation, by
      the corporation, for the corporation. We now officially have the best
      government money can buy.

    • Carole Kenney

      Money in the system as it is allowed today disparages and insults the intent of our Founding Fathers (and Mothers).  It is no longer a democratic republic when it is truly money and corporations that rule, and not We the People.  Shame on us.

    • Busheypines

      You must overturn the Citizens United ruling and make clear that corporations do not have the same rights as people.  Money in politics is corrupting.  Corporations are buying politicians.  Citizens are losing their rights.  The average person cannot possibly compete with the mega millions and billions given by multinational corporations.  This is not what the Constitution states.  Shame on the US Supreme Court for backing corporations rather than the citizens of the United States.  Shame! Shame! Shame!

    • Larry Dorshkind

      Corporations are not people. The Constitution was written to protect people from oppression and rule by others.
       

    • Allan Richardson

      There are two points against Citizens United that seem to be so obvious that I cannot understand why no one has brought them up.  First, since corporate decisions are made by one or a small group of people, the use of corporate money in political advertising is, by definition, the spending of SOMEONE ELSE’S money (the stockholders’ and indirectly the customers’), not the funds belonging to the spender.  Second, there are only two possibilities: either the funds are INTENDED to increase the profits of the company, or they are NOT SO INTENDED.  In the first case, this is BY DEFINITION BRIBERY, and in the second case, it is BY DEFINITION A VIOLATION OF MANAGEMENT’S FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THEIR STOCKHOLDERS (see the first point).  In any event, the corporation is AN ALLIANCE OF MANY PERSONS, not a separate person, except in terms of commercial relationships.

    • Dhoffa8

      So sad, Citizens United has taken power from the people.  What are we telling our children?  $$$$$=power? Again, so sad.

    • Akr5

       It’s just plain wrong to allow superpacs to donate the obscene amounts being spent.Citizens United should be overturned ASAP!!!!

    • Birdogart

      I’m nearly sixty-six years old. I grew up believing that America was the light of the world because it’s government was of, by and for the people. The rude awakening is that the people have been sold out and our long trusted Supreme Court and lawmakers are complicit. We the people must overturn their direction towards government by the billionaires! Americans don’t give up their government without a fight!

    • Roger R. Angle

      I read the New Yorker article. Justice Kennedy did exactly what he said he did not want to do. He took the right to speak from the poor and the middle class and gave it to the rich. Shame on him.

    • Sjwonder

      Nobody talks about who really benefits from all this unhindered money flowing through the PACs—the media companies to whom they write the checks paying for all the production and air time. At its core, it has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Money, baby. In your base, stealing your country. As a realist who was (like many of us) bottle-fed democratic ideals from birth, I know politics was always corrupt. Perhaps laws are not meant to stop behavior as much as it is to slow it down. So maybe we can’t stop the rich from buying fairness out from underneath us, but do we really need to make it so easy ? Maybe we can put a stop stick or two in front of the thieves driving down the interstate in our car and give our politicians a little room to work for us.

    • Robert Fisher

      Does anybody remember this?? 

      We the People  of the United States, in Order to form a more
      perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
      provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare,
      and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
      do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States
      of America.

      “We the PEOPLE” not We the Corporations!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Lucy Rice

      Money in politics takes away any representation of the people.  It seems all branches of our government have long ago been sold to the corporate, banking elite.  Money really does talk, so let’s return it to the control of we the people. 

    • Karens2010

      The amounts of money that are raised
      and put into our elections can only corrupt our process, our values, and our
      elected officials.  We must stop this if we are to make any progress at all.

    • Rosalind R. Rieser

      Our forefathers who laid the perfect foundation for ethical government never intended for money and special interests to intrude upon the decisions that our elected representatives make on the behalf of American citizens!

    • http://www.facebook.com/dlmcgrew Dixie McGrew

      Money may in fact be an aspect of free speech.  The flaw in the Citizens United decision is that CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE.  We need a Constitutional amendment stating that, so that that interpretation can never again be made.

    • Amycortese

      We, the People, want corporate money out of politics!

    • pds

      It is virtually impossible to stop the legal bribery going on in our political system when money can buy votes and more importantly voter sentiment. A democracy stops being one when voices are amplified by money, stifling the voices of the many and amplifying the voices of the few and rich. There must be a cap on donations!!

    • AVHOGAN

      THERE IS ONLY ONE CREATOR OF PEOPLE. IT IS NOT ANY POLITICAL ENTITY.

    • big mouse

      The five Justices who supported Citizens United have made a mockery of the Supreme Court.  Since you can be bought, where does that leave justice in America?  You’re position requires you to be more than a pimp.

    • Jerry Lopez, CSUN 1976

      This election season has shown time and again that the Citizens United decision was misguguided and heavily skewed by partisan politics. The court can no longer conceed that money is “Free Speech” and will not be a factor in determing political outcomes. We must rescind this Supreme Court decision now!

    • 1hamrhead

      Money is not free speech and corporations are not people. The power belongs to all the people not just 1% of them. Citizens United is tearing America down, stop the madness!

    • Rich Gilmore

      The perception that Democracy is for sale today is false. We dont have a Democracy! We have an illusion of one! We haven’t had one for a long time, what we have had is a Autocratic Capitalistic Republic for over a century. The Supreme Court just upheld that position with Citizens United. Individuals have no right or voice when they are silenced by Wealthy Corporations with greed and corruption driving their success. Our politicians have sold themselves to these interests and we have seen the failure of our system come to the center of our society today. The Supreme Court is the automaton of the Presidents who have been there not representing the people best interes but the Politics of a party system that has failed it people. This is due to greed, corruption, lack of integrity and poor character on the part of the people serving this country at all levels we see daily No great society has ever been conquered, they destroy themselve from within!! Just as we are now doing. This is a good thing though! When old systems and structures are not working they collapse. We are seeing this now. Nothing evolves with out the old dieing first!! This allows us to change the failed old forms. Please continue this disintegration we need it. WE WILL BE BETTER FOR IT IN THE LONG RUN!!!!   

    • wetdog

      nothing has been done for the VAST middle-class! & it’s sad to think that all the “politicians” & their votes are for sale. i, & millions like me, who are struggling on $20,000 to $50,000/yr., are being ruled by money-hungry, profit-at-all-cost, corporations. we want to help each other, NOT, as 1hamrhead says, “tear america down”.

    • Therocketdoc

      As a 62 year old “common” citizen and consistent voter of this United States, I stand with the many thousands who’ve commented (and the MILLIONS who agree) that our Supreme Court (and their benefactors) sold us out on this issue. This MUST stop. You are allowing a handful of very wealthy folks to attempt swaying the election process. The amount of money being spent on the election process is shameful, considering how much good it could do in other more needy arenas. Please stop this madness.
      G. R. Haskell
      Titusville, Florida  

    • Khorgan219

      Please get $ out of Washington and let the people decide who will be our leaders, not corporations.  After all, corporations are not people.

    • Nick Wilson

      Let’s get representation based on decisions for the best interests of the people,not for legalized bribery!

    • Nick

      Corporations are not people, in fact unregulated corporations can kill people, environments, planets, etc.  Don’t get me wrong I’m a serial entrepreneur of smaller domestic companies, and we do great things… I’m talking about BIG companies in BIG industries like energy, banking, etc.  END CITIZENS UNITED

    • Guest

      The worst consequence of the “Citizens United” ruling, and it’s very bad indeed, is the distorted way corporations BY LAW must use their political influence.  Because state laws of incorporation are a contract between entrepreneurs and investors that the management of the corporation must use the resources of the corporation to maximize its profitability for the investors–not to redecorate the homes of its executives or to protect the viability of the environment or the economic well-being of the community or the country it is in, unless it can PROVE doing so increases profits (which is a practical impossibility)–in exchange for limited financial liability for their actions, what they can advocate with their political influence disregards most of what the vast majority of citizens considers our country’s main goals.  Most of the commenters to this document are not blind haters of corporations, capitalism, or the rich.  They generally do not want to throw the baby, the whole idea of incorporation, out with the bathwater, extreme political influence by the very narrow concept of what is desirable which corporations are permitted to advocate.

      While they may not know why, what people like the commenters here know from long experience is that corporate political influence usually works against the values proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” and which the founders tried to advance with the design of our government.  Clearly, human life depends on more than a short term cash inflow to those w/ the means to invest in corporations, even for those investors, and more obviously for the rest of us.  For starters, the air and water can’t be poisonous, and one’s home can’t fall on top of one as a consequence of “fracking”, or be taken by banks who had made fraudulent promises of affordability.  Commercial speech can’t be used to address any of these deadly wrongs.  The liberty to share, on the public stage, one’s political ideas about what measures would be for the country’s “common good”, can’t be drowned out by the monopolization of that stage by commercial speech.  Citizens’ ability to petition their gov’t for redress of grievances can’t be denied because office-holders are dependent upon the favor of the management of mega-corporations in its proscribed corporate role, and the politicians daren’t listen to conflicting positions.  Finally, it is impossible to pursue happiness while suffering and ill due to insufficient access to healthcare, an inequity which, for financial reasons, corporate commercial “speech” can’t help resolve.

      The aggregated result of allowing the financial might of mega-corporations to advance commercial speech in politics to the point of drowning out the voices of even the most knowledgeable, patiotic and altruistic human citizens, is not only unconstitutional, it is against the spirit and practice of democratic republicanism.  It has led, instead, to a horrific type of plutocracy in which human well-being is subsumed to some abstract accumulation of “wealth” for the few who will quickly find that it cannot create well-being in world that is self-destructing.

    • Cheeduval

      Return our government to the people.  Corporations’ bottom line is making money.  Government is a social compact to facilitate a just society.  Money has made a mockery of our democracy.  Let’s stop the wholesale buying of our government before it is too late.  

    • Ahm365

      It is one thing to hold to the letter of the law.  It is quite another to completely ignore and disregard common sense and fair play.  Money is NOT speech and corporations are NOT people. As Admiral Isoroku Yamamota so eloquently and prophetically said ”I Fear All We Have Done is Awaken a Sleeping Giant and Fill Him with a Terrible Resolve!”  The (not so) Supreme Court has wronged our country and it is our duty to show the resolve and determination our fathers, mothers, and/or grandparents showed to defeat our enemies in WWII.

    • Patsy Covington

      When I read that many big companies and also Bill & Melinda Gates withdrew their support for ALEC because it is for the purpose of leaving the voter out and ensuring laws only work for those with big money, I immediately thought about Citizens United. They are the same thing. They are both morally wrong. Citizens United is a dark dark smudge on the face of America. We have been attacked from within. With Citizens United we do not need enemies to destroy us. We will do it ourselves. Please fix that. Please.

    • L. Fine

      If money is the same as free speech, why can’t each citizen be paid directly in money (rather than having to listen to all those boring words) to influence whom they should vote for?

    • Lynda West

      I believe the Supreme Court’s decision on Citizens United was one of the worse things to happen to our democracy. It ensures that only big money can elect politicians.  The Supreme Court damaged itself, but more importantly, ALL of us through their unbelieveable ruling.

    • Travelersgersh

      The democratic processes that we value and are a model for the rest of the world are being subverted and corrupted by allowing unlimited and unregulated monies to influence the political process.  The recent court decision has legalized bribery and turned our politicians from the lowliest to the president into schills for big business and the wall street investment banks and their allies.

    • Don Madden

      Money is not Free Speech….. it is Volume

    • JohnWhitling

      The Supreme Court is clearly too isolated from the real world when they do things like Citizen’s United. They are either corrupt as anyone else in DC or too stupid to even reflect on how they changes they allow can jeopardize the country.

      • A1949seeker

        Not just isolated from the real world but also from our Constitution and our founding fathers.

    • Randy V Baker

      I would love to create some eloquent comment but it seems to me, unless you are living under a rock, this is a no brainer. Nuff said.

    • EdArmm

      keep corporate money and special interests out of politics, of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE and for the People!

    • Andrewjn220

      we do not have a democracy but an auction. It’s organized crime and completely eroding our country. We claim to be free, show me. We claim to vote for our politicians, show me. At least France has a cap on campaign donations, equal amounts of media coverage per candidate and citizens who are informed by the government they pay. Our government is so busy dumbing down our citizens, focusing on greed and profit, soon the heard they continue to created will be useless without a brain or skill. 

      I would not be so confident that a revolution in America is far off. You politicians will be held accountable. Your free ride will end. 

    • Lucie McKee

      Citizens United destroyed our democracy which is now owned by corporations. The Supreme Court is responsible for this.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Forrest-Ward/100000522281327 Forrest Ward

      Citizens United and the likes of Grover Norquist have destroyed a regular citizen’s VOICE in this democracy.  I’m sure there are laws on the books making it illegal to ‘interfere with the operation of Congress’ and/or ‘solicitation of Congress’ but am baffled at why our Justice Department sits idly by while Grover Norquist holds Congress hostage resulting in our credit downgrade and the possible shutdown of our federal government, again.  And to not notice that Citizen’s United is in collusion with the Norquist Pledge and the Republicans that have signed it would be completely ignorant.  It’s time we stood up and demanded that ALL MONEY outside of registered voter contributions limited by federal law be made illegal and that Grover Norquist and the Republicans who have signed his PLEDGE for no taxes be charged with treason by our Justice Department ….  Angry?  … You bet I am!

    • http://www.facebook.com/BudRedbrickJohnson Bud Johnson

      We were established as a republic specifically to assure this couldn’t happen. By virtue of size of group or by amount of money, no group or person can be allowed to assert their will on others. By allowing special interest groups to affect legislation, whether by financial instruments or favors, that legislation inherently will not be in the interest of the people or the constitution.

    • JAR7

      Decades ago, SCOTUS held that “one person, one vote” was how our democracy works. We also have an equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment. When SCOTUS allows a few uber-wealthy individuals &/or corporations skew those rules to make them far more powerful simply because they have more money means we no longer are  democratic republic; rather, we become a fascist state where business and government are run by the same people.  It’s unconstitutional and plain wrong.  Money is not speech and corporations are not people with civil rights – they are government approved entities who do not marry, get sick, go to jail, etc. like real people do. 

    • vgodin

      The Supreme court’s decision on Citizens United allows big money to BUY politicians and elections!
      This is NOT what our founding fathers had in mind.
      This ruling needs to be reversed.  Get the big money out of the process and allow the citizens of the United States to elect their representatives fairly.

    • Anndelay

      A corporation is a group of individuals with a primary drive for profit.  A corporation is not “a” person.  So it is unfair to give free speech rights to a corporation in the way of unlimited spending in elections.  Democracy functions best when free speech is  encouraged by individual of a society.  Spending is not free speech because of the inherent income inequity in our modern American society.  For example:  people with underwater loans did not get a bailout, but the banks did.  My business was prevented for getting credit due to the bank freeze, but the auto industry bailed out along with large banks.  There is an inherent inequity between small business, individuals and large corporations.  Until corporations include safety standards, honoring the customer & employee before the stock holder, ethics & community service in their mission statement along with making a profit, they do not have the same motivations as individual citizens and small businesses.  Secondly, while I do not believe corporations are people, if they are, then the should be held to the same laws as individuals in society and stand trial for the negative results of their actions in society.  Until we get money out of politics completely our democracy will continue to deteriorate.  Elections should be short and publicly funded so that an average citizen has the ability to serve his/her community/state/country for the right reasons.  Please do the right thing and reverse the very wrong, Citizen’s United ruling.  Thank you!

    • Templat Saint

      Money is fueling a rebirth of tribalism…..political , social , individual

    • Dstromquist

      Our electoral and legislative process has been bought by big money and both processes are broken.  The representative democracy originally conceived is no longer working for the people as it should and must if we are to have a civil and just society.

    • Concerned_about_future

      Individual citizens should represent their views at the ballot box.  Individual citizens can contribute to candidates (up to legal campaign contribution limits) who support their views.  Corporations and unions are “interest groups” with “interests” that are different than the individuals’ that are their shareholders or union members.  Let the individuals speak for their own interests.  ”Interest groups” are just a slick way of allowing the elite to cheat the average American out of his say in how the government should represent the People.

    • spb13

      Get the power out of Washington, and the money will dry up.  It will take a 180 degree mind-shift for you progressives, but it is the simple truth.

    • Mikjon95

      I love my country and am saddened by all the corruption that goes on in all stages of Government, Because of the economy more fraud is being exposed. We are supposed to be a government of the people and we are not anymore. Im ashamed of where America is going. We used to be the gold standard for all the other countries,now we are only the gold tendors for corruption.

    • Michael Tobias

      by allowing multinational corporations to bankroll politics you are allowing them to influence the process for their benefit. corporations are responsible to their shareholders regardless of which country they live in. Corporate best interests are not always the best interests of the citizens of this country…..Your ruling allows people from other countries who are not citizens to define and try to control what OUR nation does. Your ruling has enabled a plutocracy and is destroying our what is left of our democracy. there is no way a single voter can compete. if you can buy millions of dollars worth of advertising, most of which is VERY slanted, you have an unfair advantage. influence peddling must stop. Get the money out of our political system!

    • Danee’ Costa

      Citizens United has destroyed our democracy and has allowed corporation and religious groups (cults) to purchase our elected officials, police departments and courts.  It has made our so called democracy a farce.  Other countries are moving way ahead while we stay in the dark ages.

    • Lvarts

      I
      hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied
      corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial
      by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.

      Thomas Jefferson

    • Maab76

      The rules in our country should aide and support all of its citizens, not just the ones with the most financial foundations.  It is the people who make our country great.  Let us support them.

    • Woofwoof

      As someone who is NOT wealthy, I feel like my vote doesn’t mean a thing.  I can’t buy or rent an elected official to do what I want him/her to do.  Corporations are NOT people and shouldn’t be allowed to give unlimited campaign donations.

    • blanchedub

      We no longer have a Democracy in this country thanks to our own Supreme Court. This is a travesty!
      The Supreme Court must undo the damage they have done as soon as possible. Our voices have been silenced by the billions of dollars being spent to manipulate our elections and our laws. It’s time to stop the madness before it’s too late.
       

    • Ellenhgoldberg

      I am very concerned and a little frightened about the direction this country is taking. We are allowing a very few to hijack our democracy and dictate to us–the people whose interest is supposedly paramount (that’s a laugh)–according to their very narrow, selfish desires. We are on a very slippery slope and we are quickly losing our grip. Citizens United must be struck down and the buying and selling of our democracy must stop.

    • RONGOULET663

      Constitution says for the people by the people.Not for the elite by the affluent .It is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOT THE UNITED STATES OF CORPRATE AMERICA

    • Peggy Robbins

      The constitution begins “We, the People”.  It says nothing about corporations.  We cannot let corporations buy our democracy.

    • William Stout

      If you folks are so determined to turn the United States into a corporation then you should start paying us, instead of the other way around!  

    • Songcatcher

      I’m not quite sure why we are surprised at the level of corruption in our government when we have this kind of ruling on campaign contributions.  It was already bad enough before, that winning an election was more about how much money the candidate can raise than anything else.  Now it’s out of control.  Until we institute significant campaign reform, we will not regain our democracy.  And we have lost it, make no mistake about it.  With the 2010 ruling, we lost what little we had left.  Even good, moral, principled candidates are now almost forced to play games to win an election.  Average citizens now have little to no say in the issues.  Voting is not quite a farce at this point, but almost.  I would strongly encourage and plead with the Supreme Court to re-think this ruling. 

    • Kwarner

      I absolutely agree with Forrest Ward…there should be NO moneys changing hands between business and congress and NO LOBBYIST and the pledge for no new taxes is ABSOLUTELY TREASON AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS SUCH!!!!!

    • Simpson3771

      Corporations can be created by only legal documents.  People cannot be created by legal documents.  I am sick to death of this once great country having been turned into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the money changers, the corporations who pay off legislators through lobbyists and buy off aspiring legislators to ensure laws that will feed the greed, the bottom line, regardless of what it does to the American people.

    • Stasia Stjames

       The Citizens United ruling ranks down there with the Dred Scott.  In one misguided and highly partisan decision the Supreme Court of the United States has destroyed ‘One man, one vote”  Dred Scott denied the rights of citizenship to slaves, former slaves and their descendants.  Citizen United denies the rights of citizenship to 99% of the population.  This court will be seen as the absolute worst in the history of the nation.

    • Sally

      We need to undo the damage that the Citizens United decision has created. In their decision the Supreme Court recognized the potential ramifications but too readily presumed regulations would stop the corruption etc. Well they were wrong, and they have done a great injustice to our beautiful democracy – so it is time for them to reverse their decision and if that is not possible we  a need  constitutional amendment. Take money out of politics.

    • LHarv

      If we don’t get the money out of politics we can kiss our democracy goodby.  As long as citizens United stands someone should arrest BP, a legal person, for the murder of its workers in the gulf disaster.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ken-Burgett/1374710479 Ken Burgett

      We
      the
      People

      (Corporations) of
      the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union
      (Monopoly),
      establish Justice
      (Advantage), insure domestic
      (worldwide) Tranquility
      (Profitablity), provide for the common
      (selfish) defence
      (greed),
       promote
      the general
      Welfare
      (particular Welfare of the Rich), and secure the Blessings of Liberty
      to
      ourselves
      (for the Corporations) and our Posterity
      (Executives), do ordain and establish this Constitution
      for
      (Ripoff 0f) the United States of America.

    • Charles Greenslade

      Your most recent ruling on Citizens United had led to further corruption of our political process and has taken away the rights of the average American citizen for a true Democracy.  Now, political elections, legislation and our Democratic principals are all in the hands of corporations or special interest groups Not the American people.  I hope you are proud of yourselves for this action.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ken-Burgett/1374710479 Ken Burgett

      We the People   (Corporations)  of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union  (Monopoly), establish Justice (Advantage), insure domestic (worldwide) Tranquility (Profitablity), provide for the common (selfish)  defence (greed),  promote the general Welfare (particular Welfare of the Rich), and secure the Blessings of Liberty  to ourselves (for the Corporations alone) and our Posterity (Executives), do ordain and establish this Constitution for (Ripoff 0f) the United States of America.

    • Rick Smith

      My voice should carry the same weight in who and how I am represented as any other person.  By equating money to free speech wealthy individauls now get to amplify their voice at the expense of those of less means.  Then to make the decision even more harmful the propsition that all men were created equal and therefore be represented equally the court recognizes corporations as peolple so that those that control corporations can amplify their voices exponentially even though a large portion of their shareholders may or may not agree with.  It is absolutely imperative that this decision be overturned to preserve the the core values of our democratic republic. 

    • Tom Karasek

      We can’t stop corrupt congressmen from accepting corporate bribes but you can re-interprete “people” to be humans. You can also cap individual contributions and declare them not to be “free speech”. Only you can correct this gross distortion of democracy.

    • Andrew Wright

      This is a damaging law which gives rich people (controllers of large corporations) additional voting rights which dilutes true democracy — the vote and rule by citizens. It is ridiculous to extend the legal classification of a corporation to include voting rights (which is essentially what this law does). We strive to be a country governed by and for the people; a corporation is not a real person. A corporation is a legal entity which is governed by real people who already have their fair share of votes: one per real person. Andrew Wright.

    • Joe

      This is your opportunity to undo the damage done to our American way of life by Citizens United. Your ruling has fundamentally muted the voices of most American Citizens for the benefit of a very few. Please, please, reverse your decision at the earliest opportunity. 

    • Steve Beswick

      Eliminate Special Interest Groups and put the power back into the hands of individual citizens.

    • SamanthaFarr

      The composition of our government should not be determined by who has the most or can raise the most money, but rather by competency. Let’s allow our representatives to spend their time wisely, working for us and not themselves.

    • http://www.facebook.com/kalasonnygirl Sonny Kalabum

      Shame on you, Supreme Court Judges – every one of you! I don’t care what legal manipulations you use to justify your decision – you sold out EVERY HUMAN AMERICAN CITIZEN and you need to FIX THIS! You will be going down on record as the worst damaging batch of judges ever elected. If you don’t fix this disgraceful display of bought-out justice, you should all be impeached.

    • SARITA E

      When an avalanche of cash supplied the very, very few controls the lawmakers and the electoral process in a democracy, is it still really a democracy?

    • Janmacwill

      Citizen’s United will not stand for long in this country. You can do the right thing and correct this horrendous mistake, or the united people of these 50 states will do it, to your shame. Selling our government to the highest bidder makes a mockery of what we ‘like’ to call a democracy.

    • Ron

      The Court’s grant of personal political rights to corporations is you ultimate insult to every American citizen. Shame Shame

    • Arthurbishop

      I join this non-partisan effort to get big money out of politics.  Thank you Senators McCain and Whitehouse for your efforts.  This is rediculous – buying an election for the corporations.

    • Lcmalick

      Citizens United has given the Court a huge black eye.  An incredible lack of judgment and discernment by brilliant people who should have known better and a major abuse of a power that should be exercised reasonably.  Historically it ranks right up there with Dredd Scott and Plessey v. Ferguson.  What were you thinking!

    • JimForr

      We’re already seeing ads containing outright lies that are paid for by unknown millionaires and billionaires.

    • Grover

      We don’t want corporations and foreign countries running this country. 

    • Ismail Rifaat

      The consequences of your decision re Citizens United are now amply evident. Please reconsider.

    • Dan Timanus

      Corporations are NOT people! They are businesses made up of employees. Employees are people and no single or group of employees should be allowed to decide the political policies of all as a “Corporation”.

    • carl scala

      why do we americans assume its normal for our president and presidential candidates to beg, pander, and sell their souls to the devil, for money to run their campaigns?….  not even a fourth world country should resort to this… the funds should come off the top from ”we the people”, not from a handful of ”we the motivated zillionairs”… is this any way to run an airline?…  also, we must must amend the constitution to have a one, 6 year pres. term….   maybe a second 6 year term, but not consecutively….  i for one, am sick and tired of having a president for 1 year and then having to endure a 3 year fiasco political season, while all important decisions are put on hold till a hopeful president is re-elected…  

    • Jane Smith

      I can think of no moral justification for giving more political power to multi-national corporations who will never be driven by the interests of this country, much less this country’s people.  I fear unintended consequences.  I fear even more an agenda that supports the demise of democracy.

    • Tparten

      This
      decision is allowing businesses owners to use their vast capital to persuade
      millions to choose Politicians that will make policy for their personal
      prosperity, even if individuals on their board, stock holders, customers or
      employees disagree with their views. Who does this country belong too, all of
      its citizens or a few extremely wealthy? Do we live in a democracy or a plutocracy?

    • Jimk518

      Logically speaking, a corporation or union cannot have a singular “opinion” unless it can be proven that every single employee is in agreement with it. What if the board of directors decides what the “official corporate opinion” will be even though 95% of the employees disagree??? It’s baloney. It’s a fraudulent use of the law in order to allow big money to overshadow the opinions of individuals.

      The idea of a corporation being guaranteed the right to free speech is illogical and silly. In my mind, every employee who disagrees with the “official opinion of the corporation” is being denied his or her right to free speech – which is, in fact guaranteed by the constitution.

      This whole issue is silly and could have only have been upheld by a Supreme Court with an obvious agenda. It’s disgusting.  

    • Delilah

      Its too bad a repeal of Citizens United won’t happen before the November elections.  This is One of the worse decisions EVER by the SCOTUS.

    • Wfrederi

      What is to stop a foreign power from donating millions to a Presidential Campaign and expecting favorable treatment in return? Corporations now can invest millions to do the same limiting the individual’s right to determine the outcome of an election by influencing people with ads that twist the truth! Justice Roberts needs to swallow his pride and work tirelessly to reverse this ruling. This will show the American People that the Court is infallible and can correct its mistakes. A Democracy is a ‘..Government of,for, and by the people….not a corporation!

    • Wags

      I’ve been saying it (or some variation of it) for too long; “good citizenship” cannot compete with the corrupting influence of cash. Citizens United sold our future.

    • sharon tornes

      To the highest court in the land:  This decision was supremely desctructive.  Just undo it!

    • Ed Matthews

      If, as the Republican candidate asserts, corporations are people, then didn’t your ruling effectively give those people an additional vote? As it stands the CEOs, CFOs, union officers, etc. effectively vote twice. Make it right! 

    • Whale83638

      Citizens United Verdict perhaps the worst and most destructive ruling in the history of the Supreme Court. The damage to democracy caused by this ruling is only worsened by the Court’s insistence that corporations (an inanimate capitalist creation) are accorded the same rights as people. The Court’s decision in this case is a perversion of the constitution. 

    • OkeeDokee777

      I want to vote for someone the people have chosen to support rather than a multi millionaire bought mouth piece. I pay taxes so that this country can have a social net to take care of the most vunerable in this nation not so big compaines can get tax breaks and subsidies. I want my taxes to be used to protect the environment and do research into systems that improve the lives of everybody not just a select few. If I refuse to pay my taxes out of protest I will go to jail. If I mismanage my company and it fails I go out of business. I am too small to save even though I provide employment to others. This system is way to messed up. The worst decision ever made by the supreme court was Citizens United The name in of itself is an insult to the majority of the population of this country. It represents a select few with deep pockets and humongous political egos. Their only directive is to ensure that the puppet they support will enact on their behalf. Screw the rest of us.

    • Jo

      There are so many things about the Supreme Court that are very disturbing. They have too much unchecked power and they quite obviously should not be appointed and then not for life. So the whole business is so unjust, how does one begin to fix it? The fact that in our elections, the one with the most money wins, totally makes our elections undemocratic. Isn’t democracy our country’s cornerstone? How can we as a country fix this??????????

    • Jstrand

      time to reverse the influence of big business/special interests  and undo the damage that has been done to our  representative political system

    • Pam Allen

      Citizen’s United was the wrong decision.  No one wants to admit they were wrong but in this case, if you don’t our democracy is doomed.  Please reverse this horrible decision.  My voice and my vote is what matters, not my wallet.

    • Jimk518

      The good news, is that We the People can use the exact same tactics to offset the silliness. Sign up with a group that shares your opinions! Donate if you need to. Stop buying products that come from these money-driven corporate clowns that are out to destroy the environment and dominate the middle class in the name of bigger profits. Get nasty! Name Names! Cut off the money stream and these monsters will die on the vine. We have a choice. If we continue to give them our money, they will continue to use it against us.

      Starve the beast.

    • Cckmb70

      The economic problems and disparity plaguing this country stem from a government for hire. The corporate elite are allowed to buy protection for their profits while having tax payers underwrite their losses.

    • notforsale

      We are not for sale, even if it sounds as refreshing as Koch and Frost. 

    • madashellinTN

      The Citizens United ruling was one of the the most horrible and destructive rulings ever to come out of the Supreme Court. In NO way is a corporation a person!!! This despicable ruling must be overturned in order to save American democracy. A good start might be impeaching all the judges that voted in favor of it!  

    • Johndacquistophd

      I believe that a state election should be run within the state and no outside money should be allowed in that state to sway an election and a decision that the people in that state want…The people in that state should make the choices to elect an official with no intervention from people outside that state. Corporate funds being allowed in a state election should be disallowed and in the Presidential election should not be allowed to donate to a Super Pac, it defeats the purpose of campaign funding. So if one person is allowed to give $10 Million dollars to a campaign that is only one vote and they are trying to buy other votes by submitting those campaign dollars…That isn’t fair. People should be able to make that choice for their candidate and decide on their own without influences from the Corporate sector…It is plain and simple “lobbying” at it’s best, right inside the campaign, keep it seperate just like church and state keep them seperate because we can all see what it does to people and it gives the wrong message when they are inter-mingled together…and that goes for both side and in the middle…

    • Tom McLaughlin

      Your most recent ruling on Citizens United has led to further corruption in our election process and has brought shame on the Supreme Court.  Elections have become “Auctions” and those with money can and will put in office those who will promote their special interests

    • mcd

      This was a political decision and it is not the role of the Supreme Court to determine politics. Oh, I forgot – Bush was a “supreme court” president and look where that lead us. This needs to stop if this country is to be a democracy. We’re already in a free fall.

    • Barrygreenstein

      Please exercise your judicial skills a little more carefully with the country in mind.  Please reverse Citizens United.

    • http://twitter.com/pallentx Paul Allen

      I appreciate the free-speech concerns the SCOTUS was trying to protect, but some common sense needs to prevail. Our elections have turned into nothing but an ad-buy strategy that have little to do with issues and more to do with last minute torpedo politics where the candidate with the most money usually wins. Corporate money has completely overshadowed the ability for ordinary citizens to have any voice that can be heard in Washington. From electing candidates, destroying candidates, to setting the agenda, corporate money rules this country now. What would the founders have said about that?

    • Carolyn

      Our Democracy was never intended to be “For Sale”!! This MUST stop now!!!

    • Jake Bauer

      It´s shameful that the people (?) we have elected to govern our country have set themselves apart from thiose they are supposed to be representing. They vote themselves higher salaries and allowances, special health plans, special retirement plans which no one else is allowed to have. They are wined and dined by lobbyists and are looking at the dollars they can pocket for their own benifit besides the priviledges they have approved for themselves and this is just not right and never has our country reached the level of disgovernment which we are now seeing every day. 
      Our representatives, in general, are not interested in the people they supposedly  represent and it´s a shame for us to have allowed our country to be in the condition it´s in today when we have  elected “responsable people” to administer our country. 
      Apparently we, who make up this fine country and pay for all of the bad, even horrible administration, of our country. Those who have put us in the situation we are in do not have to answer for any thing. They just go and live on their fat retirement checks and forget the ruinous situation they have left us in and all we can do is continue to pay for these high debits.
      We are swayed by propaganda paid for by companies who can and do benefit from the candates they pay to get elected and we the people have to suffer the consequences. It´s a crime and no one can be punished except the people who pay taxes to support this kind of government. It´s all big bucks now and damn those who try to do right by the people of the country.

    • Ezio48

      As if what the American people think means anything to these guys or anybody else in power in the Fascist States of America.

      Remember that Mussolini’s definition of Fascism was the joining of corporate and government power! That is what we have!

      “When we view the political elite, we are seeing the monkey who does the dance and not the organ grinder who call the tune”

    • guest

      We, the people, are not being represented by our government.  Global corporations, with no loyalty to our country, our people, our resources, or our planet, are calling the shots.  This is not democracy.  Global corporations, that pay little to no taxes, bribe our officials, while hard-working tax-paying citizens struggle to survive due to a lack of representation.  This is the worst case of taxation without representation.  

    • Bob

      Our government by the people and for the people.  Unaccountable corporations persons have no place buying and influencing our elected officials.  Citizens United must be abolished.  

    • concernedcitizen

      This marriage of big corporate money and government must stop!  Instead the track is being greased by citizensunited.  Mussolini himself defined fascism as “the marriage of government and corporations.”  Our democracy is on a fast track to fascism therefore.  END CITIZENS UNITED in the name of all that is authentic in our history of democarcy.

    • GH

      The equation of Money to Speech has been debated and largely resolved through Supreme Court decisions during my lifetime.  In recent years we have all seen its disastrous consequences.  How can anyone hold that corporations do not expect – nay, demand – a quid pro quo for their donations to politicians and political parties?  We live in a world where any company can employ its prodigious P.R. apparatus to take out full page ads in any newspaper laying out its position on a given issue.  it can advertise to its heart’s content.  Why then is there a need or a rationale for companies to inject money into our politics?  Towards what end?  I think most of us know the answer, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with “speech.”

    • Henry Barousse

      “Citizens United”?  What does a decision that grants personhood to cooporations and permits unlimited anonymous political contributions have to do with a united citizenry?  We can only hope that enough real citizens will unite to overturn this arrogant assault on democaracy.

    • tatbaarAR

      Granting the rights of citizenship/personhood to a corporation gives the CEO and board members TWO votes and exponentially more power than the average taxpayer.  The whole point of democracy and this country is that EVERY person should have equal input and power in the election process.  As it stands, those with money and connections have and exercise increasingly more power than I do, as a voter with one voice and one vote.  Please correct this part of the problem:  reverse Citizens United.

    • Omgitsrfb

      I don’t think it’s an overstatement at all to say the future of our beloved country is at stake.  I think you only have to ask yourself one simple question, “Do you believe our founding fathers and the men and women who fought for our independence from colonial rule, fought so that one day we could be subject to corporate colonial rule?”  

    • Kdunn34

      Did the framers of our Constitution want corporations to decide our elections?  I think not. Of, by, and for the PEOPLE!

    • Ed Golditch

      Just so you so called justices understand. There will come a day when the real American people understand that you operate on the behalf of the wealthy elites of this country, the 1%, and could care less about protecting the rest of us. The passing of Citizens United was a direct slap in our faces as well as the decision you made in 2000 in which you effectively chose our president. Why the people did not confront the Court then I still don’t understand. Nevertheless, I still have hope that We the People will take back our country. Perhaps a few more STUPID decisions from you will get the people to react. One can only hope.    

    • http://www.mayavase.com/ Justinkerr

      I am appalled at the amount of money that is being put into this election season. If these millions of dollars were applied to textbooks, or research or even the bringing back of one factory that has been shifted overseas, it would make much more difference in the lives of Americans

    • philosophe22

      Corporations are not people. They do not have the same checks on immoral behavior that people do. Corporations do not have consciences. Their shareholders are protected from liability for their companies’ immoral, destructive actions. Multinationals do not even have limited peer pressure to “do the right thing” (in the sense that business people in a town would).
      On top of this inherent “moral flaw” in the corporate structure, even the best intentioned executives face pressure from large institutional investors to do anything and everything to increase the bottom line. One of the easiest, cheapest (in the short-term) things to do is to “bend” public and bureaucratic tolerance for risky, destructive, but profitable, actions by stilling regulatory agencies, using “spin” to mislead voters, and creating tax loopholes (among other misdeeds).
      Long-term, such manipulation is producing big bonuses, a toxic, deadly environment, and suppression of vital new technologies. “Citizens United” is another huge blow against long-term sound decision-making by corporations. It is a disgrace to the Supreme Court’s history…another Plessy v. Ferguson. Reverse it, lest Americans lose all confidence in the Court.

    • Leeshultz

      The Citizen’s United ruling has created a situation in our democracy that gives people with great wealth control of our government and those who represent us.  I feel now that my vote no longer counts.  When a single individual can contribute millions of dollars to sway the opinion of a large segment of our society, often with misleading ads, elected officials are being bought and paid for.  There is an element of fraud and an abuse of power because of the money contributed.  How can a politician be for the people they say they represent when they are obligated to the special money interest to do their bidding.  They are bought and paid for with big money to represent their own financial interest and not those of the people they represent.      Get the money out of our politics and allow only the people of this country to fund campaigns.  Corporations are not people they have no soul just money and power especially in the political arena.  Please reconsider your decision not on political ideology but on the constitution.  I can not equate myself and a corporation as a person.  I am a person not a corporation.  

    • Thomas D’Alessio

      Making a corporation a “person” (a hideous, amoral, mechanical, coin-operated, PAC-faced robot, actually) in a political environment where everything is for sale, has turned human beings (read: a votes) into a commodity to be bought, sold and traded, has replaced truth with 60-second commercial disinformation/propaganda, has replaced the pursuit of happiness with pharmacorp prozac, and has turned our democracy into a Brave New World more pernicious than the one Aldous Huxley imagined.

    • Kchetney

      People are sentient beings, corporations are not.  Therefore, corporations should not be considered individuals in the context of a single human being.  Corporations are a conglomerate of individuals making up an entity not an individual in its own right, since “indvidual” is used to connote “ of, relating to, characteristic of, or meant for a single person or thing”.

    • Mojosail

        Tough battle before us.   Corporations and their lobbyists buy our politicians. Our politicians appoint the justices. The justices support the corporations.  Giant circle.
         We are just the non-represented(democrats-poor, republicans-rich) working class that pays for everything.
        
      Sick of eating cake.

    • Guest

      Our founding Fathers would turn in their graves if they only knew. Shame on Wall St. and shame on you.

    • Harry Letaw, Jr.

      The miscalculation represented by the affirmative votes on Citizens United is the greatest since someone tried to legislate Pi = 3.  Please fix this ruinous error that has struck a blow into the Heart of the Republic!

    • Maryann

      What is happening in American politics is appauling. I have been watching the Wisconsin governor race closely. Regardless of party affiliation, why should one party (in this case, the Republicans) outraise the other party by a ratio of 25 to 1. Corporations are NOT PEOPLE and SCOTUS knows this fully well. Corporations do not vote in local, state and federal elections — only private citizens do. Until this situation is resolved, the billionnaires will have the last laugh, the last vote and the power to elect whomever they want! And, we must continue to do whatever we can to stop this practice. And, I will further say that our current president is the primary reason Justice John Roberts moved his court in this direction. Had Mr. McCain been elected, there would not have been such a ruling.   

    • Karenwarfield

      Oops, looks like it was a mistake to allow big money to steamroll over the country. The court needs to “unlike” the notion that corporations are people and undo its mistaken ruling.

    • Receivingu

      The principles behind the establishment of the United States were historically influenced by the Age of Enlightenment. The decision in favor of Citizens United is adversarial to these basic principles. The immediate anonymity of the propaganda machine made possible by the Supreme Court decision is in direct opposition to our founding principles. Throughout our history, many lives have been sacrificed fighting others who have been manipulated by the propaganda machine of their leaders. This is the dangerous path we have now embarked upon. I urge you with all sincerity to reverse your decision. Corporations are not people just because people can be corporations. Please give back to The People their voice.

    • rexozone

      It is vitally important to the restoration of a true sense of democracy and preservation of what elements of that philosophy the US enjoyed prior to the Citizens United ruling that the concept of one man (woman) one vote be returned to the concrete definition as is biologically required for the identity of a living, breathing human being, as common sense, devoid of special interest might allow. What’s next? One vote per firearm?
      Allowing corporations the same right as individuals to control the outcome of elections is tantamount to treason since corporations are not held accountable nor responsible for patriotism. Their potentially nefarious effect could be motivated by any number of external forces, forces that it have been demonstrated to value our way of life less tan those who live it…and while the institution of slavery and subjugation may offer a perfect business model we as a nation have struggled mightily and shed our lives to gain ground against such cruelty. That has been the experience of true patriots and moral human beings. Let this cynicism against the value of life itself die an immediate death.

    • Guest

      The worst consequence of the “Citizens United” ruling, and it’s very bad indeed, is the distorted way corporations BY LAW must use their political influence.  Because state laws of incorporation are a contract between entrepreneurs and investors that the management of the corporation must use the resources of the corporation to maximize its profitability for the investors–not to redecorate the homes of its executives or to protect the viability of the environment or the economic well-being of the community or the country it is in, unless it can PROVE doing so increases profits (which is a practical impossibility)–in exchange for limited financial liability for their actions, what they can advocate with their political influence disregards most of what the vast majority of citizens considers our country’s main goals.  Most of the commenters to this document are not blind haters of corporations, capitalism, or the rich.  They generally do not want to throw the baby, the whole idea of incorporation, out with the bathwater, extreme political influence by the very narrow concept of what is desirable which corporations are permitted to advocate.
      While they may not know why, what people like the commenters here know from long experience is that corporate political influence usually works against the values proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” and which the founders tried to advance with the design of our government.  Clearly, human life depends on more than a short term cash inflow to those w/ the means to invest in corporations, even for those investors, and more obviously for the rest of us.  For starters, the air and water can’t be poisonous, and one’s home can’t fall on top of one as a consequence of “fracking”, or be taken by banks who had made fraudulent promises of affordability.  Commercial speech can’t be used to address any of these deadly wrongs.  The liberty to share, on the public stage, one’s political ideas about what measures would be for the country’s “common good”, can’t be drowned out by the monopolization of that stage by commercial speech.  Citizens’ ability to petition their gov’t for redress of grievances can’t be denied because office-holders are dependent upon the favor of the management of mega-corporations in its proscribed corporate role, and the politicians daren’t listen to conflicting positions.  Finally, it is impossible to pursue happiness while suffering and ill due to insufficient access to healthcare, an inequity which, for financial reasons, corporate commercial “speech” can’t help resolve.
      The aggregated result of allowing the financial might of mega-corporations to advance commercial speech in politics to the point of drowning out the voices of even the most knowledgeable, patiotic and altruistic human citizens, is not only unconstitutional, it is against the spirit and practice of democratic republicanism.  It has led, instead, to a horrific type of plutocracy in which human well-being is subsumed to some abstract accumulation of “wealth” for the few who will quickly find that it cannot create well-being in a world that is rapidly self-destructing.

    • Cesare

      Considering that most of our ‘leaders’ believe that corporations have the standing at law of real ‘mud ‘n’ blood ‘ types like us it is just a short jump to giving corporations legal rights as humans.  ’Citizens United is simply one of the ridiculous outcomes stemming from this legal fiction of corporations as people.  Our founders are whirling in their graves!

    • Brian Wadsworth

      The United States of America is starting to look like a Banana Republic by the untramelled exercise of power through corruption by the country’s elite. This is your chance to reverse the trend.

    • Stephen G

      By any stretch of the imagination, in a real democracy money does not qualify as speech, corporations do not qualify as people, more pointedly, as “citizens”.  With Citizens United, the Supreme Court created a travesty of our democracy, effectively destroying our free speech, effectively destroying government of, by, and for the people, effectively destroying our democracy. It is crucial to the reinstatement of our once constitutional democracy that Citizens United be overturned.   

    • Gwelp3

      The Supreme Court must be for sale if they can make a ruling like this. A fetus is not a person, but a corporation is? Please, get out of the money pit and get back to God and Country.

    • Susan Dickens

      I love my country and am sick at heart at what has been happening We need to remember why our county was founded.  Here’s what one of our founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, said about corporations (and big banks are considered corporations).   In an 1802 letter to Secretary of State Albert Gallatin, Jefferson said, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”Thomas Jefferson also said this in 1816,  “I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”  This atrocity, Citizens United, must be overturned for the sake of our beautiful country! 

      • Diane Asay

        This really says it all! So glad to have this Jefferson quote to share! Thanks.

    • CTYanyee

      We’ve already seen that money is buying elections.  The assumption that money would not affect the outcome has been proven wrong and the decision must be overturned.

    • David Ege

      Corporations are NOT people.  Hey, RATS (Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia) leave your ideologies at the courthouse door.

    • Robert Ness

      By saying that “corporations are people”, the SCOTUS has usurped the concept of “one person, one vote”.  Completely amazing how the GOP has so successfully taken this nation backwards through corporate neo-fascism during the last 12 years. 

    • Chad Harris

      It is beyond time to step back and admit that we lost our focus on the citizens of this country somewhere along the way. I implore you to realize this and work to let the people of this country make the decisions again instead of just the ones with money and power.

    • BeachD1

      There is no way to continue to allow the Supreme Court to continue as it has become a “RICCO”, Racketering Corrupt Criminal Organization, as the current crop of Justices have violated their Oath of Office in disregarding the rules of LAWS found in the U.S. Constitution. We the People will work to devolve the mess of “Lifetime Appointment” to the Court. 

    • Debra Hope

      Even though I’m making regular, grassroots level contributions to the President’s campaign, I have never felt so alienated and out of the loop in my life.  I know it’s important for the little people to contribute, but I wonder – no, I’m sure — about how much difference it really makes. 

    • Guest

      We have the opportunity to demonstrate what true democracy should be, not only to US Citizens but to the world.  Corporations are not people.  We the people should be what democracy is all about. 

    • Kay Milne

      The Citizens United decision is terrible for our country.  It allows a few mega-rich individuals and corporations to anonymously dominate the election process.  We don’t even know who is paying – that is not the American Way.  Americans believe in fair play and open discourse, not secret opulent rooms where the fat cats decide everything.  A corporation has no conscience and it’s only goal is to maximize profit – this is not what elections are for.

      • Steben53

        or as nancy Pelosi said, “Why bother with elections?  Why don’t we just ask them what they want?”

    • madjik

      I understand that everyone deserves the right of free speech. But when I see a political attack ad, funded by enormous super pacs with no idea where the actual money came from, I have no idea who is really doing the speaking.
      If I feel that my voice must be heard, I want my face and name right along with it. It must be known that those opinions are mine. Speech is speech. If you are extraordinarily wealthy and want to be heard, fine. Step out on the sidewalk and start talking. If people want to listen, they will. But just because you have more money than I do doesn’t mean that your voice should carry miles further than mine. If you are just spending millions funding attack propaganda often filled with divisive rhetoric and lies, then wish to hide behind a legally afforded veil of anonymity, then it is the ad itself that has the freedom of speech, and not you. Free speech should be for real people, real Americans, not the puppets of ventriloquists.
      The citizens united ruling has turned the wonderful concept of free speech into the dirtiest, darkest and most cynical version of itself than I can possibly imagine. I find myself wondering about the original intent of free speech rights. I think, and I hope, that is about the average citizen, regardless of standing, having the ability to express themselves without fear of reprisal from the government. Was it intended to allow the wealthiest among us to scream loudly in a way that the rest of us cannot? To scream so loudly that the rest of us can no longer be heard? To scream lies so loudly that it influences the voting public, and we don’t even get to know who they are? What if the those that are funding the attack ads are Chinese? Russian? Saudi?
      This is a republic. Out votes determine our leaders. But allowing the wealthiest among us to secretly influence how we vote cannot possibly be good for our country.

    • Lowell Anderson

      This has certainly got to go. Yes and shame on wall street.

    • American

      Please
      bring back sanity to this country’s electoral system and repeal Citizens United.
      Corporations are not people; they are a legal fiction, and unlike real people cannot
      balance the basic need to survive with basic human traits like conscience and
      compassion. To rule that they deserve protection under the constitutions bill
      of rights is a travesty of justice and undermines the credibility of the Supreme
      Court. It would be laughable except for the very depressing and real effect
      this has had on our Country.

    • Donald Murdock

      Please consider restoring our democracy. Right now the country is run for and by the fat cats who have their own self interests at  heart. The Citizens United ruling gave unlimited power to the wealthy and large corporations. If corporations are “people’ let’s make their CEOs zccountible as individuals instead of hiding behind the protection of the corporate blanket. Please reconsider your ruling and consider the other 99% of our citizens. Right now I say vote against all incumbents and against anything that cost money unless you know what the money is for.

    • john yoksh

      Citizens United posits not one individual-one vote;  but one dollar-one vote.  That virtually unlimited, unregulated money can be allowed to flood the consciousness of anyone exposed to modern media manipulation is to simply ignore and deny the well understood science of advertising as propaganda.  The harm may be lasting and irreparable.

    • Sagebrush

      The Forefathers established the United States as a Constitutional Republic, I am shocked the Supreme Court with unconstitutional decisions like Citizens United, would turn that Republic into a fascist corporatocracy.
      (–A situation in which corporate bodies interact with sovereign power in an unhealthy alignment between business and political power–)The American People need to be more involved with who is picked to sit on the Supreme Court bench. Maybe then we can have a Supreme Court that defends the Constitution and represents the People. For a long time we have had 435 people in Washington D.C. who have forgotten that is their job and what they are supposed to be doing. If they’re not going to do their job, fire every single one of them and get some people in place who will.   

    • Michael Nothman

      When the Founders wrote our Constitution, and when the Bill of Rights established the concept of Free Speech, political or other, the legal basis for Corporations had not even been established. It was not until the early 19th Century that Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that”A corporation is an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and
      existing only in contemplation of the law”. A corporation is a legal
      entity, distinct and separate from the individuals who create and
      operate it.
      Since a Corporation is “separate from the individuals who create and operate it”, and since the Bill of Rights guarantees the Freedom of Speech to individual citizens, not to “artificial beings”, the ruling in the Citizens United case simply allows such “artificial beings” to use their enormous wealth to overwhelm the constitutionally established political process and destroy our democracy.

    • gbakere

      Our system was designed so anyone, from any walk of life, could be elected to public office. It is now a game only the wealthy and/or those who hob nob with the wealthy can play. Corporations and the wealthy view funding political campaigns as business investments. When 94% of elections are won by the candidate with the most money, that makes for pretty good odds for wealthy contributors. They don’t support candidates because they like the politician’s views. They buy the right to shape politicians’ views and all “We, the people” end up with are mouthpieces for power brokers who want to manipulate the system for their own purely profit driven benefit. It ends up having nothing to do with what’s best for America or Americans. We must take the money out of politics.

    • Steben53

      They have no emotions, they have no conscious, they know no love, they know no fear.  Corporations are an abstract entity that exists by permission of the people.  They are not a people nor are they endowed with unalienable rights by our creator.  Democracy is nothing more than a pact among a people.  It is designed to serve the interests of people.  Citizens United perverts the function of our democracy to serve the interests of corporations and the wealthiest among us.  Citizens United has tarnished this most sacred and trusted of America’s institutions and the Roberts Court will be condemned by history unless you fix it now.

    • Mhjake40

      Congress and the Supreme Court need to be reminded that they hold their positions in government to serve ALL  the people.
      Catering to few elite has to stop and if they can not see their was to do so we have to make our voices heard louder than
      ever.

    • Stan

      Take the “Elections for Sale” sign off our democracy NOW!!

    • Don Parker

      Washington D.C. is now synonymous with “the most mediocre government money can buy”.  Dialing For Dollars is a Sunday school class compared to our rigged casino in D.C., buying exactly who our “elected officials” are and/or will be, to represent the ones who put them there – and I don’t mean the glassy eyed voters…  

      • Sagebrush

        Amazing isn’t it? We are living in a society that today has the most expensive, criminally corrupt, incompetent government on the planet, and most of the people are ether in denial or oblivious to the reality of what has transpired. I guess everything looks great when your head is buried in sand or MSM propaganda. Seeing the truth through ether one is impossible. 

    • Hemppuller

      It’s truly amazing that there are politicians who are part of the problem to stand up to the larceny that happens daily in our political arena.I believe there are some folks in the supreme court who are a little suspect also.Isn’t it time to go back to the ideals the original constructers of the constitution had intended.FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE! If any citizen was to conduct business like our politicians do we’d be in JAIL for many crimes of larceny!

    • James Ingram

      I am an 88 year old WW2 Vet and every since the Kennedys were  killed, I have watched my country slowly go down the drain because of big buisness and money influence.

      • Finneyfood

        JM took $$$$ from the Rothchild Family for his presidential campaign don’t trust him or OBamney

    • Iyabattle

      Stand up for higher the higher principles you have been assigned to represent.
      Bring our democracy back to the people and out of the hands of those who destroy
      our environment and care not for the welfare of humanity.

    • Frankedmiston

      We have always had a corrupt government, now the Supreme Court is throwing it in our face.

    • Abigail Beutler

      The cost of running for office is driven by the cost of TV.  TV channels should be required to GIVE a specific amount of time to all candidates for national office.  If any candidate BUYS more time, then the selling TV channel should be required to GIVE the same amount of time to all the other candidates. The TV channel does not own that frequency, we, the people, own it.  It is granted to the channel by the FCC, and one of the conditions is public service. Regaining our democracy certainly qualifies as public service.

      Only by removing the need for money to buy TV time can we regain our democracy.

      • corporatemedia

         Exactly right.  I’ve been saying that for a quarter century.  Others say that, too.  But the press, be they mainstream or nutstream, never seem to cover the primary issue concerning “all that money in politics”:  Where does the money end up? 

        Answer:  In the pockets of the corporations that own the media.

        While all along using the people’s airwaves.  What a screwjob.

    • Dtshelby

      Our current system allows votes to be “bought” by large corporations and super Pacs making large donations to members of congress for funding of their re-election.  This then promotes the members of congress to actively support the specific needs of the donors in the hopes of getting more donations.  This system completely overwhelms the individual votes of small donors and really puts our system “up for sale”.  I strongly support single terms for all members of congress as well as for the President.

    • MB Wong

      Money that help to elect officials to pass legislations that rape citizens has to stop!

    • Barb L

      Citizens  United is possibly the most poisonous ever made by the Supreme Court, right up there with Dred Scott. It has made the dollar the most important factor in who can run for office and who holds office, whereas ability, courage, integrity and commitment to country should be foremost. Now that we can all see the consequences of this horrible decision, please reverse it so that we can have elections which make sense and begin to solve the enormous problems crippling America.

    • Diane Asay

      By making unlimited money a legitimate expression of free speech you have relegated democracy to the wealthy.  By making institutions and corporations individuals you have made a mockery of the American way of life, so that those who have made it may destroy the path for those who have not, the opposite of who we are meant to be.  I used to believe that our government was designed so beautifully because it allows the free expression of all opinions and biases, while at the same time (because of the ever-refining intentions of the 9 justices) will ultimately err on the side of “the least of these, my brethren.”  The Supreme Court, the third and essential element of our government, is meant to provide check and balance to partisan Congressional and Administrative actions and uphold democracy above the forces of capitalism; you have sacrificed democracy to the worst of capitalistic compulsions and become an enforcer of bias and bigotry.  In Citizen’s United you have demonstrated a cynicism that corrodes our future and destroys hope, and for me, worst of all, toppled my pride in this country’s evolution toward honor.  Your arrogance shames us all.  

    • Exotikat

      I have am a naturalized American, and when I realized how dysfunctional the American political system is, I spoke frequently about my concerns that America is no longer a democracy. Citizens United has demonstrated that loud and clear, and now the majority of Americans appreciate what I have been saying for years. Power over our laws and policy needs to be returned to the voting booth, and taken away from powerful corporate interest who have bought and influenced politicians for far too long.

    • guest

      THERE IS ONE OTHER WAY TO CORRECT THE MISTAKE THE SUPREME COURT HAS MADE —  VERY SIMPLE –  SO AS TO CLEAR ANY IDEA THAT OUR CONGRESS AND SENATE ARE FOR SALE TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER….. (HA HA) – WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO OUR CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAWS????  WHY WOULD ANYONE BE ALLOWED TO VOTE ON ANY ITEM OR BILL THAT IS PRESENTED TO THEM WHEREAS THEY HAVE RECEIVED CONTRIBUTATIONS FROM ANYONE AFFILIATED WITH  THE ITEM OR BILL????  THEY MUST NOT BE PERMITTED TO VOTE ON THE BILL.  GEE THIS COULD POSSIBLY STOP ALL THE BUYING OF OUR GOVERNMENT….

    • Steve H

      In the US speech is not free if you can’t afford it. Corporations don’t breathe, can’t bleed, are never sent to prison, don’t have children, they don’t die. They shouldn’t have the rights of living, flesh and blood humans. Extend privileges to them, bestowed by the People. Don’t give them rights. Rights are for living humans not inanimate corporations. The way things are set up now, shareholders of corporations have two votes, their individual votes and their corporate votes and even those are controlled by the majority owners. This nation is supposed to be a “one human, one vote” nation. The Fourteenth Amendment has been abused since 1886. It’s way past time to fix that. Congress needs to pass a 28th Amendment telling the SCOTUS and their corporate handlers that only humans are persons and money is not speech.

    • Top1can’tstand…

      It truly is unbelievable how corrupt Citizens United really is…….The Top 1% really are going full speed ahead to destroy our Democracy and these Right Wing Hacks on the Supreme Court have paved the way for them to do it in broad daylight!!! From Corporate Hey-Boy Roberts to the weirdo Alito, the Catholic Bully Scalia, the mute, mental midget Uncle Clarence Thomas to the feckless and wishy-washy Kennedy, the 235 year experiment in Democracy is about to see the Republic be destroyed by “Corporate People” to the detriment of “Real People”. If Citizens United stays in place, “We The People” will just fade away!!!

    • Sam Sabean

      How can it possibly be “We The People” when the billionaires, big corporations, & unions spend so heavily to influence opinions and outcomes.  Whoever came up with the system of BIG Boy spending ought to step back and realize and see the damage.  What chance does “We The People” have or ever have without leveling the playing field and giving us a “FREEDOM.”
      Sam Sabean – Eden Prairie, MN   

    • Steve

      Sometimes smart people make mistakes.  This truly seems to be the case in your Citizens United ruling overturning years of prior law.  People already feel that big money controls the agenda and have lost confidence in their institutions.  The Citizens United Ruling only reinforces that feeling and that the Supreme Court can also be bought.  Please review and reverse the decision for the good of the country.

       

    • J R Clintonn99

      When we can hang corporations until they are DEAD, for the crimes they commit against society …then and only then are they “People”…until then Corporations are owned by stockholders…they are the people and have one vote each and an individual voice…that equals mine…retun some snaity to our Republic. The Court has erred in the past and has and can correct earlier errors in judgement.
       It would be nice to see a SCOTUS be above politics…the point of life time appointments.

    • Mcoleman002

      This seems fairly simple: In a democracy, the people decide, in an oligarchic plutocracy, unit of currency or other measures of wealth decide. As the former grows weaker, the latter gets stronger. Is there any realistic hope for a truly democratic republic when the highest court in the land decides that dollars have more say in deciding policy and making laws than do the people? 

    • Judy Davidson

      This ruling was appauling.  You took the power of the common voter and placed it in the hands of corporate America and a quite possibly into a few hands of the very wealthy.  I sincerely request you reverse this decision.

    • John babcock

      How can it be a democracy when 186 rich people can spend unlimited amounts of money for political ads–are they the only ones allowed in the  “POLITBURO”?  How can the “serfs” voice be heard?

    • From America

      Every Supreme Court Justice who voted for “Citizens United” ruling should be impeached and/or removed from the bench… including Roberts.  Its hard for the common folk to understand why Justices on the Supreme court would support or argue for a ruling that clearly defies common sense…. and should be considered an act of treason against their country… as the court has clearly done.

      “Corporations are not people”…

      Wake up America…..  

      Remove them from the bench….     

    • Parvintheatheist

      Did we ever have a democracy? America is a Republic and money has always played a significant role in our elections. I believe America is a country of the rich by the rich  and for the rich long before the citizen united case.

    • Irinbigd

      The court needs to reverse Citizens United and restore the right of actual human beings to make their voices heard and contribute to the public debate without being drown out by the vast wealth of imprsonal institutions. 

    • Lynn Mansfield

      If corporations are people then Texas could execute them.  BP would be in jail for the oil spill. Exxon would be in jail for the Exxon Valdez and on and on and on.  Until then CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE!!!!

      • debbieqd

        And, Wall Street would be on death row.

    • AKHunt

      The shameless decision by the conservative members of the Supreme Court which gave us Citizens United has taken us back to the Gilded Age where democracy was “for sale” to the highest bidder. The ruling erased a wall that has stood for a century between corporations and electoral politics. The Court took a minor case and used it to strike down a ban on corporate spending. Chief Justice Roberts the “Trojan Horse” of the high court decided to take this opportunity to change the law. The very notion that corporations are people flys in the face of common sense. Corporations are creations of the the state which exist to make money! Congress must act to limit the damage of this decision which strikes at the heart of democracy. The ruling should be revisited by the Supreme Court and struck down in order to save the vision of the founding fathers.

    • a member of WethePeople

      Corporations are not people.  Money is intrinsically a threat to democracy.  One man (or woman) one vote does not have an exception for the 1%.  We are terrorized by the political imbalance where Republicans have chosen most of the members of the Supreme Court.  Historically those selected to serve have risen above the partisan politica which put them in office, but that has not been the case for many years.  Now we have sitting justices participating in partisan fund raising activities and accepting payments for influence through second parties and relatives.  Getting the money out is the least we can do.  Perhaps impeaching a few Supreme Court justices would be a better activity.

    • a citizen

      In the annals of American history, will this Court be written as the court that put up the “SOLD” sign on our government and democracy?  Or will it be written that this Court safeguarded the fragile yet resilient democracy of the United States of America, to continue as a beacon to the world, that corruption and plutocracy will not triumph over it?

    • From America

      Can a US Supreme Court justice be impeached and removed from office?

      “Yes”……
      Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.
      A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.
      Article III, Section 1 states that judges of Article III courts shall hold their offices “during good behavior.” “The phrase “good behavior” has been interpreted by the courts to equate to the same level of seriousness ‘high crimes and misdemeanors” encompasses.
      In addition, any federal judge may be prosecuted in the criminal courts for criminal activity. If found guilty of a crime in a federal district court, the justice would face the same type of sentencing any other criminal defendant would. The district court could not remove him/her from the Bench. However, any justice found guilty in the criminal courts of any felony would certainly be impeached and, if found guilty, removed from office.
      In the United States, impeachment is most often used to remove corrupt lower-court federal judges from office, but it’s not unusual to find disgruntled special interest groups circulating petitions on the internet calling for the impeachment of one or all members of the High Court.
      The Impeachment Process
      Impeachment is a two-step process; the impeachment phase is similar to a Grand Jury hearing, where charges (called “articles of impeachment”) are presented and the House of Representatives determines whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a trial. If the House vote passes by a simple majority, the defendant is “impeached,” and proceeds to trial in the Senate.
      The House of Representatives indicts the accused on articles of impeachment, and, if impeached, the Senate conducts a trial to determine the party’s guilt or innocence.
      The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.
      At the trial a committee from the House of Representatives, called “Managers,” act as the prosecutors. Per constitutional mandate (Article I, Section 3), the Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court) must preside over the Senate trial of the President. If any other official is on trial, an “Impeachment Trial Committee” of Senators act as the presiding judges to hear testimony and evidence against the accused, which is then presented as a report to the remained of the Senate. The full Senate no longer participates in the hearing phase of the removal trial. This procedure came into practice in 1986 when the Senate amended its rules and procedures for impeachment and has been contested by several federal court judges, but the Supreme Court has declined to interfere in the process, calling the issue a political, not legal, matter.
      At the conclusion of the trial, the full Senate votes and must return a two-thirds Super Majority for conviction. Convicted officials are removed from office immediately and barred from holding future office. The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.
      Impeachment and Near Impeachment
      Only one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase (one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence), has ever been impeached. The House of Representatives accused Chase of letting his Federalist political leanings affect his rulings, and served him with eight articles of impeachment in late 1804. The Senate acquitted him of all charges in 1805, establishing the right of the judiciary to independent opinion. Chase continued on the Court until his death in June 1811.
      In 1957, at the height of McCarthyism, the Georgia General Assembly passed a joint resolution calling for “The Impeachment of Certain U.S. Supreme Court Justices” believed to be enabling Communism with their decisions. The resolution targeted Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, Tom Campbell Clark, Felix Frankfurter, and Stanley Forman Reed (as well as several unnamed deceased Justices) for “…[usurping] the congressional power to make law in violation of Article I, Sections I and 8, and violated Sections 3 and 5 of the 14th Amendment and nullified the 10th Amendment of the Constitution.”(from Wiki Answers)

    • Desiree Mills

      It is time to change old behaviors the definition of insanity is trying the same action repeatedly and expecting a different result. We are not getting anywhere and haven’t for years letting the rich have all the breaks, and carrying it all on the working class, doing it this way is not working and it never will, let us take our country back from the greedy bullies.

    • Jvansic

      Corporations are business entities, not individuals. There is no reason for them to have the same privileges and rights of people. The best way to reform electoral politics is to severely limit the amount of money given to election campaigns, from either PACs, businesses or people.

    • Gary Bione

      Your decision in Citizens United is destroying this.  If any of you can’t render fair, non-political decisions I think you resign from the court or be impeached.

    • Gary Bione

      Sorry left out the word “country”.

    • irrefudiate

      Five people on this court created a human out of a government construction. They, then, conferred upon this “human” the rights of American citizenship, though these “humans” claim no, and pledge no allegiance to the United States.

      This same court ruled that money is speech and, as such, must enjoy the protection of the Constitution. This naive ruling gives a whole new meaning to a corporation (human) engaging in “free speech” with a congressman.

    • Kurt

      As history proves, if money were speech and corporations were people, we would never have achieved democracy in the first place. Let’s return to the assumptions underlying free speech and voting that formed the basis for the Constitution. Citizens United is simply an adaptation to accommodate corporate interests, not a protection free speech.  Let’s return to the integrity of individual rights, so dearly achieved in our extended history, that the amended Constitution clearly intended.

    • Pat Eggett

      As a citizen of the USA I find your ruling on “Citizens United” most partisan. The Supreme court should Always consider the full consequence’s of your actions. Putting big money into politics will only corupt our system of goverment further.
      Corporations are NOT people. They need to be regulated and watched, not given free reign to BUY politicans OR in this case members and the Supreme Court Judicial system. (& family’s) The balance of your office should Never be compromised. You have overstepped your duty’s. I have lost all respect for the court in the last 12 years. You are to serve the people…Not the special interest groups. Please reconsider your decision. And in the future Please DO NO HARM. “We The People” deserve better.

    • Mantyfan

      When I see a “corporation” carrying a rifle in a war zone, when I see a “corporation” waiting in line at a food pantry, when I see a “corporation” volunteering at a child’s school , when I see a “corporation” sitting a a church pew, when I see a “corporation” marching with the Occupy movement, when I see a “corporation” working in a field from sunup to sun down, day in and day out, then maybe I will believe a corportion is a person. Needless to say, I will not hold my breath to see any of those scenarios.  Only when we get big money out of our political system will we have any hope of having a democracy that represents all of its citizens.  

    • debbieqd

      Dear Justices,
          I’m sure you hear the outcry from all corners of America against your Citizens United decision.  We’re not lawyers or constitutional scholars.  Many of us don’t have titles at all.  We’re just good American people that have come to realize you made the single votes we have meaningless, lacking the power of the punch we always felt was ours.  You’ve made a terrible mistake and, now it’s time to restore your credibility as the non-partisan third branch of our government.  Restore democracy of the people, for the people and by the people.  Admit it, and fix it. 

    • cathy

      please, please give us back our democracy. citizens united  does not serve the citizens. as we have already seen, it has completely corrupted our democratic society. corporations are NOT people. money is Not speech.

    • Chris Ruch

      dear members of the supreme court.
      this is a completely obvious no brainer decision, unless you too are in the back pockets of the almighty special interest groups like most politicians.  for the good of our country, as an example to other countries, and for the integrity of the supreme court, do the correct thing and rid us of citizens united.

    • Kirk D. Gardner

      In 1776 after George Washington accepted the sword of England’s General Lord Cornwallis,  Washington’s generals bowed before him and beseeched their Commander-in-Chief to accept the crown of North America. Thrice did they offer and thrice did he refuse, knowing that the destiny of the United States was to be the archetype of freedom, equality, and brotherhood for the countries of the world.  But now, certain members of our United States Supreme Court have opened wide the gates and have enabled our beloved Unites States government to be sold to the highest bidder. This is an unconscionable act (and in my opinion, tantamount to treason) and it should be resisted by every fibre of every  true American. My forefathers fought and died to make America a free nation. My ancestors were among the the first to found the New England states. The blood of patriots runs in my veins and I will not stand idly by and see my beloved America destroyed by a band of would-be tyrants who are bent on turning my country into an oligarchy.

      Kirk Dey Gardner
      House of Dey

      • Nnnooccc

        In my book, it is treason.

    • Ellie Michon

      If Citizens United is not overturned there really will be no need for future elections.  We can just auction off our country to the highest bidder. 

      • Nnnooccc

        We American citizens are on the auction block also and on the path to our past history of a nation of slaves?

    • muttnut

       Corporations are not ‘people’- My understanding of the Constitution is that it deals with the rights of ‘individuals’, not entities (corporations). Thus I think that the Citizens United decision is a political decision.

    • Clydau

      The people of this country will not allow a few “Billionaires” to control this  country.  Think about it.  It could get ugly.

    • JimmySub54

      We the people of the United States have become self-aware of the injustice and hypocracies prevalent in our political system. Politics no longer works for the benefit of the American People. It’s sole purpose of providng for the politicians, multi-national corporations, banking institutions, big oil, big pharmacology, the American Medical Association, Insurance industry, etc. is obvious and we the people will no longer tolerate this behavior in our government and society. We are exhausted past the point of no return providing money through taxes and commerce for the benefit of those who are in the top one tenth of the top one percent.

      Our country was founded on strong principle of providing opportunity and equality for the American citizens. Government, politicians and commerce was not intended to take over and receive all of the benefits. Today’s slavery exist more prevelant than in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds. Our shackles have been replaced with debt. Our task masters are no longer private individuals and have been replaced with corporate boards and stock holders. We have freedoms to choose many options in our lives that the slaves before didn’t have. But the attitudes of the new task masters are not so different form the old.

      We the people are demanding our government return to the premiss for which it was created. We demand restructuring in order to prevent the abuses that are prevelant today.

      • Nnnooccc

        I believe our government will be restructured one way or the other.  There is little choice.

    • Tomkat7

      Citizens United is an absolute shame.After 100 years what were they even doing looking into this.A corporation is not the same as an individual voice and no politician should even be allowed to talk to a lobbyist.They should be proud to be an elected politician not someone who is bought and paid for by anyone or any corporation.Another thing that should be stopped is falsehoods and downright lies in these ads.This Supreme Court and Citizens United just makes middle class America sick.Our current political system is at an all time low as the entire right wing is bought and paid for and Citizens United is just icing on the cake.This Supreme Court should be ashamed of themselves as they also gave us George Bush even though he lost in 2000 and look how that turned out.Citizens United is a crime and it should be overturned immediately.

    • Nancy Smith

      The audacity of you to reach back 100 years to justify making corporations “people”.  Then to decide that money equals voice and should count that way in our democracy is specious reasoning.  Your entire decision on Citizens United needs to be revisited and overturned.  You have provided the tools for the destruction of our democracy.  You no longer have the “consent of the governed” from this citizen; if my vote counts at all given how meager it has grown in the shadow of the gargantuan corporate influence.

    • Paul Vadas

      The U.S. Supreme Court has always been the final place to guarantee democracy (the will of the people), as well as the preservation of the rights of the monorities from the encroachment of the powerful. It is supposed to be non-partisan. It is supposed to be the protector of individual’s rights. It is supposed to uphold the constitutional rights of HUMANS above all else. Corporations are not humans. They are not people. They are not citizens (they can’t even vote). They are fictitious entities created by law for especific purposes. To claim that corporations are people is an aberration of the wildest imagination. To allow corporations to influence the democratic political processes is a destruction of the basic democratic principle: one person, one vote. When the Supreme Court decided that corporations were people, it abdicated its fundamental function: the protection of the rights of real flesh and blood people, especially of those people who do not posess the magaphones of “free speech” that money can buy.

    • Pat

      We are seeing the consequences of the “Citizens United” decision which I sincerely hope were not intended by the Supreme Court.  Regardless of the intent of Court Justices who affirmed the decision it is now time to very seriously RECONSIDER THIS DECISION.
      Political power should rest in the hands of the flesh and blood citizens of our Democracy.  Corporations are not democratic entities.  They are not human, they are not citizens and they are not required to support the freedoms guaranteed to citizens by our Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Corporations have a place in our society but not as rulers of our government.    

    • DgoJMR

      Dear Supreme Court Justices:
      I am truly non-partisan.  I vote for about as many Republicans as Democrats.  I believe that the Citizens United decision has opened the floodgates to big money from both parties.  And, it has guaranteed that politicians will only be answerable to big money and not to the people they represent.  We have seen in the just completed Republican primary how an individual billionaire could literally buy the outcome of an election.  No longer are we one man/woman – one vote.  Instead, we are ONE RICH MAN/WOMAN/CORPORATION – BUYING ALL OF THE VOTES.  The Supreme Court Citizens United decision must be dialed back.

    • Lee

      Since you have made this decision, I donʻt know that you can undo it because making a decision like this could only mean you are corrupted.
      When a corporation can bleed real blood, cry, suffer hunger, give birth to children then maybe they can be considered “a person”.
      Until then, you need to undo this decision more easily than you did it.

    • Marguerite Vincz

      Why did the Supreme Court make this decision?  Were they thinking of the
      results, of the unfairness it would create in our elections? Aren’t the
      American People and not big money supposed to be election our
      Presidents? Why wasn’t this done before during any other election? Now
      that we have a black President in the White House, it seems that there
      is some racism involved!! I hope not, but it certainly looks this way! 
      If not, it is showing partiality towards the Republicans like when the
      Supreme Court decided in the Gore-Bush Election that Bush has the most
      votes!!  I am not happy with what is going on in our country, especially
      with the Decisions of The Supreme Court. We are supposed to believe in
      them and trust them. I , along with many others no longer do!! 

    • montels2

      The bribery has gone far enough!  If a normal citizen (which congress is suppose to serve) took the money that Congress does for legislation we would be in jail.  It is called bribery when some does something for another company and receives a gift.  It is called bribery when congress passes laws for contributions and accepts jobs from these lobbyist.  It has nothing to do with SERVING the citizens of this country.  The system needs to be changed and all these politicians need to be jailed!!

    • Geoffrey Smith

      The little guy’s voice is now drowned out by all the money.  How can the court possibly come to the conclusion that the founders would have been for Citizen’s United?  It is the out right “buying” of our political process by the uber wealthy.

    • Bob Williams

      Citizens United has turned our government into a yard sale. Give the government back to the people. Corporatioins are NOT individuals. End of story. 

    • Jean Snow

      Our founding fathers were brilliant statesmen and creators.  They must be spinning in their graves at this Citizens United decision.  Not one of them held an open hand behind them waiting for $$ to be piled into it by greedy corporations willing to destroy the United States of America.  Do you, who voted for Citizens United, want to be remembered as those who destroyed this United States?    

    • Dtolomeo

      We want a country in which decisions are made by the people as individuals, not by corporate America. It is an illusion that our votes make a difference if things are determined simply by whoever has the most money. 

    • suzanne shaughnessy

      Justice Roberts,  I recall you calling our President a “liar” at the State of the Union address….he wasn’t was he???!!!! Sir as you have such a Royal position in this country, as we cannot vote you out, we cannot do anything to remove you from the courts, and you and the other right wing justices have a responcibility to the peoples of this country..not to the super packs..the richest of the rich…you single handedly have taken our freedom to vote away…now because of your despicible rulings the power is not with the real working people in this country….it is with the MONEY….vile…shame!!!…now you want to take away our rights to fair health care…what else do you want from us?? because we have very little to hope for…Because of our protectors. The Supreme court has been sold to Karl Rove…and all the super packs….Supreme dictatorship!

      • From America

        Yes we can do something… we can impeach Justice Roberts.

        Can a US Supreme Court justice be impeached and removed from office?

        Yes……

        Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.

        A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.
        Article III, Section 1 states that judges of Article III courts shall hold their offices “during good behavior.” “The phrase “good behavior” has been interpreted by the courts to equate to the same level of seriousness ‘high crimes and misdemeanors” encompasses.

        In addition, any federal judge may be prosecuted in the criminal courts for criminal activity. If found guilty of a crime in a federal district court, the justice would face the same type of sentencing any other criminal defendant would. The district court could not remove him/her from the Bench. However, any justice found guilty in the criminal courts of any felony would certainly be impeached and, if found guilty, removed from office.
        In the United States, impeachment is most often used to remove corrupt lower-court federal judges from office, but it’s not unusual to find disgruntled special interest groups circulating petitions on the internet calling for the impeachment of one or all members of the High Court.
        The Impeachment Process
        Impeachment is a two-step process; the impeachment phase is similar to a Grand Jury hearing, where charges (called “articles of impeachment”) are presented and the House of Representatives determines whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a trial. If the House vote passes by a simple majority, the defendant is “impeached,” and proceeds to trial in the Senate.
        The House of Representatives indicts the accused on articles of impeachment, and, if impeached, the Senate conducts a trial to determine the party’s guilt or innocence.
        The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.
        At the trial a committee from the House of Representatives, called “Managers,” act as the prosecutors. Per constitutional mandate (Article I, Section 3), the Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court) must preside over the Senate trial of the President. If any other official is on trial, an “Impeachment Trial Committee” of Senators act as the presiding judges to hear testimony and evidence against the accused, which is then presented as a report to the remained of the Senate. The full Senate no longer participates in the hearing phase of the removal trial. This procedure came into practice in 1986 when the Senate amended its rules and procedures for impeachment and has been contested by several federal court judges, but the Supreme Court has declined to interfere in the process, calling the issue a political, not legal, matter.
        At the conclusion of the trial, the full Senate votes and must return a two-thirds Super Majority for conviction. Convicted officials are removed from office immediately and barred from holding future office. The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.
        Impeachment and Near Impeachment
        Only one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase (one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence), has ever been impeached. The House of Representatives accused Chase of letting his Federalist political leanings affect his rulings, and served him with eight articles of impeachment in late 1804. The Senate acquitted him of all charges in 1805, establishing the right of the judiciary to independent opinion. Chase continued on the Court until his death in June 1811.
        In 1957, at the height of McCarthyism, the Georgia General Assembly passed a joint resolution calling for “The Impeachment of Certain U.S. Supreme Court Justices” believed to be enabling Communism with their decisions. The resolution targeted Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, Tom Campbell Clark, Felix Frankfurter, and Stanley Forman Reed (as well as several unnamed deceased Justices) for “…[usurping] the congressional power to make law in violation of Article I, Sections I and 8, and violated Sections 3 and 5 of the 14th Amendment and nullified the 10th Amendment of the Constitution.”
        (more on Wiki Anwers)

    • Draw

      fetuses and Exxon are not people.

    • Jeanne

      Citizens United is unjust. Where is democracy?

    • Joyelizabeth1

      Recent polls have shown that Americans’ respect for the Supreme Court is at an all-time low, and that our faith in government is seriously waning. I want to believe in democracy again, and in the Supreme Court. I won’t begin to regain this faith until their ruling that businesses are people is overturned. It is unjust and will do untold damage (as it has already done) to our great country. What will we say, 50 years from now, looking back on what could have been?

    • tbnorthwet

      We should not be known around the world as having the “Best Government Money Can Buy”  It is time for all Americans no matter your point of view to take the money out of politics and law making. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1551115436 Michael Johnson

      I am a citizen.  I have one voice, one vote.  I have limited means.  Does this imply that a corporation, able to raise and spend millions, has a more valid voice in government than I?  I have elected representatives.  Tim Johnson is one of my representatives, great guy who I’ve actually had a chance to talk to on the phone for maybe 10 minutes one day by chance.  Why should it be that some corporation, with effectively limitless resources, can pay someone to sit all day and bend the ear of people in congress?  No citizen, without great hardship, could even hope to gain that kind of influence – unless they were an ex-senator.  These corporations aren’t even necessarily head-quartered in the US – so, not only is our  political process for sale to those who can afford it – it is at the mercy of extranational interests?  It is shameful.

    • Judy

      Citizen’s United puts our democracy at peril.  Was this really your intent?   

    • Riegler_richard

      The Supreme Court is just wrong!  Corporations are not people.

    • Glenda

      I am appalled at the disconnect between our government and the people. Citizens United has been a large part in creating that disconnect.  Reverse this democracy destroyer now.  

    • Paul McCracken

      Citizen’s United has opened a floodgate of special interest, SECRET money, to completely corrupt our elections.  “We the People” has become “They, THE OWNERS,” and it is your responsibility to uphold the integrity of our electoral process and our democracy.  Our society cannot afford to be sold to the highest bidder.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000299836633 Brooks Groves

      I’m a Social Security beneficiary and receive 100% VA Compensation.  I disagree with the majority position on the law that money is free speech.  This allows the wealthy to buy our elections.  Free speech comes with responsibility, openess and not anonymity.  Your decision must be reconsidered and repealed.  It’s making a sham of our elections! 

    • m berling

      ” ……the (Supreme) Court’s opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self-government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt”.   Justice John Paul Stevens 

       

    • Phil Jacobson

      Corporations are not people. Name a corporation that woke
      the kids up and got them dressed for school this morning. Name a corporation
      that stopped at McDonalds for a cup of coffee on the ride in to work. Name a
      corporation that has to pick the kids up from school, help them with their
      homework, do the laundry and make dinner tonight. No, corporations aren’t
      people. People of varying political opinions make up corporations, not the
      other way around. Undo Citizens United and remove legalized bribery from
      Washington DC.

    • Trdappi

      This is supposed to be the country where all persons voices are supposed to be heard equally.  Citizens United states that money is speech.  Money is measurable, some have more some have less.  In America, a few have most of the money, some have a little, and many have none.  If money is speech, than a few people have most of the speech, some have a little bit, and many have none. 
      The Constitution, as a document, is supposed to protect the citizens of the United States from oppression.  By ruling that corporations have the same rights as people, the Supreme Court has taken a step to effectively oppressing the voices of many in favor of the few

    • Doug Stephens

      I’m not sure upon which constitutional premis money is considered speech, but Citizens United certainly grants unequal influence to those with the most money.  As a citizen I understand that I have a responsibility to fight for my rights and the rights of my children and grandchildren.  But your decision has essentially tilted the playing field to an extent where my voice will never be heard against the deafening roar of big money.  Please reconsider.   

    • Shelby Beach

      We don’t need the best government money can buy, we just need the best government !

    • Wkpatches

      Common sense would dictate that businesses and unions are not people.  The common sense criteria that should have been used to answer this question is whether businesses and unions as entities alone can perform bodily functions as people do.  All people understand that the anwer to this question using common sense is that businesses and unions are not people unto themselves.  Furthermore, if you follow the logic of the Supreme Court in making its decision, it would be reasonable to conclude that unions at least do represent real live people which is not the case for businesses which are designed to make money. 

    • MAB

      This was a disastrous decision!  It is making it possible for big money to buy our politicians.  Time and again we are seeing huge amounts of money going to candidates and the money has not come from the people who will be represented by these politicians when they are elected.  The politicians bow to the will of the huge PACS that are responsible for their getting the most votes.  Much of the money is spent on lies and scare tactics.  There is no way an honest candidate can pay to correct the trash that is broadcast about him or her.  If this form of purchasing political power is allowed to continue, 5 people on the Supreme Court will be responsible for the decline and eventual demise of the type of Democracy that we have had in the United States.  Shame on you!!!  It will be government of Karl Rove, for Grover Norquist and by the Koch Brothers thanks to the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

    • Gjam

      If corporations are people then a corporation can hold an elected seat in our representative form of government, correct? Then why not elect Exxon-Mobile as president and be done with it. No wait, perhaps JP Morgan would be a better fit to govern as they have all that business experience on their resume.

    • Ejbrock

      When politics become an entity that money can buy, we then become no better than a third world country.  Those with the most money will have the louded voice.  Those who have no money voices become muted.  The United States will no longer be governed by a Government for the people, by the people, but a Government for the Rich! 
      We then are no longer a democracy and our country’s motto will surely change.  Because it will no longer be “In God We Trust but In the Greenback, The Benejamins or what ever slang is appropriately used to define the dollar bill. 

    • L. Friedman

      The Citizen’s United ruling by the US Supreme Court clearly gives multimilliondollar corporations overwhelming influence in getting its agenda than does the individual citizen.

    • Roger Kingston

      Corporations and Super-Pacs are NOT people. The “one-person, one-vote” principle means that every citizen is entitled to equal opportunity to influence public opinion and voter behavior. The Supreme Court was WRONG to approve unlimited annonymous  and corporate financial contributions in politics.

    • John Harvey

      Who’s the adult in the room?  Citizens United could be equated to letting Children have a free-for-all in the candy store!   Someone needs to be the adult in the room. 

    • Dean

      As an Independent, for years I have felt that there are two issues facing this country that are undermining the foundations of democracy:
      1. the K-Street lobbying industry has expanded tremendously in the past 30 years and now wields total influence over Washington.
      2. attempts at effective campaign finance reform have failed.

      Regarding the second issue, Citizens United has simply added fuel to a fire which was already out of control.

    • Sunnie733

      CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE!  What is so hard to understand about this?  Why isn’t common sense applied here?  Can the Supreme Court answer that?  No, I feel really upset by this……is our Supreme Court bought, too?

    • Mike Thomas

      Of the Corporations, By the Corporations, For the Corporations was not the principles of this country.  America should not be for sale!

    • Mtretiak

      It is sad that this country has been taken over by greed. Money does the talking and the working class has to struggle to put a decent meal on the table every day.
      Forget heath care! If you get sick and don’t have coverage, you are doomed.

    • Priscillaweber

      Thomas Jefferson would be ashamed of the current lawmakers.
      He wanted a government of, by and for the people.  James Madison
      was worried about about our “elitist” members of Congress “plucking
      the minoritiy of its rights and possessions.”  The rich are the majority
      in Conress-both houses.  The minority is the poor.  Is there any thing
      like “conscience” anymore?

    • John Mattingly

      Citizens United has corrupted our political system exponentially.  Please recognize your error and correct it.

    • Sgmuckinhaupt

      All you need to do is look at this election cycle to see how your decision corrupted our politics and made this a nation not “for the people”, but for the monied special interests. Why do you believe corporations should have more power than the people?

    • Michael Gordon

      The Supreme Court is not perfect, except when they are perfectly WRONG!
      Corporations are not people; money is not speech.
      Our politicians today rarely do what is right…even though they know what right is.
      Our Supreme Court justices also know what right is…but their decisions only prove that they too are politicians.
      Anyone out there want to bet how “Obamacare” comes out of the Court.
      Unless Justice Kennedy sees the light………………..
      C’mon ladies and gentlemen of the Court……..let’s do what’s right. 
      Congresspersons often cast votes designed to keep their jobs; You have your job for life!
      Do the right thing for the people!

    • Mike

      I support repael of Citizens United. Coroporations are not citizens.

    • Dannis Arledge

      Come on all you politicians, start thinking about the people like you were elected to do.

    • Willroy

      In a democracy only those who can actually vote in any given election should be allowed to have any input into the electoral process. Groups, organizations and corporations cannot vote and therefore should not be allowed to participate in any way. Foreign citizens, organizations, corporations and governments are already excluded, as should be groups, organizations, corporations within the jurisdiction of the given election. Only actual individual citizens who are eligible to vote in that particular jurisdiction should be allowed to participate. That would be democracy. Government OF the people, FOR the people, BY the people. Actually a very conservative concept as opposed to the extremely radical “Citizens United” ruling.

    • GG

      The U.S. Constitution is not a perfect invention. It is the responsibility of the three branches of government to address it’s shortcomings.

      In the age of modern and expensive mass communication we cannot rely on the Legislative or Executive branches to correct the accidental equivalence of money and freedom of speech because these two branches are beholden to moneyed interests in order to attain office.

      Therefore it is the responsibilty of an honest Supreme Court to correct this flaw since it is their branch that has been given the indepenence to make the hard decisions. Instead this Court has rendered an “ivory tower” interpretation of the law with no regard to the immense changes that have taken place in a modern political environment.    

    • Randy Simon

      Unless you consider people corporations repeal this inane ruling, the country’s future is in your hands.

    • Walter Cadmus

      Walter Cadmus:  If something doesn’t help “WE THE PEOPLE” Then it is NOT in our best interest!

    • Guest

      Please do not allow “capitalism” (Big $ interests) to destroy our democracy. Get the $ out of politics; it can be done w/ your help

      Please,
      John Contos

    • Alexyzz

       

      Post Citizens United
      SuperPACs have demonstrated that the legal-reasoning train carrying “corporations
      are people” to “money is speech” via First Amendment rights has been side
      tracked from the democracy station to the plutocracy terminal.   

    • ourfreedom4ever

      Our government is for sale.  We don’t want big corporations or the richest of the the rich to make our decisions, Citizens United has no place in America’s politics or anywhere else.  Please repeal and give our country back to we the people.

      • Nnnooccc

        Unfortunately,  our government IS for sale and it is mortgaged to the hilt.

    • Rbird

      It should be the  People voting our representatives in office.

    • msmaddy67

      Well yes..  they too need to know since their the ones who made judgement Supreme Court Judgement on this one!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=18710099 Alejandro Almirola

      I feel that the Supreme Court set a terrible precedent in Citizens United by overturning over a century of caselaw that put an essential limit on corporate spending and influence in our democracy. This decision opened up a Pandora’s Box of negative consequences that will devastating consequences on our democracy as demonstrated by the inundation of SuperPacs unduly influencing our elections. Now, more than ever, our politicians are more beholden to special interests than ever before threatening the trust between politicians and the people. I urge the Court to see the error of its way and overturn the terrible decision of Citizens United. 

    • Jens

      The Supreme Court has become the sole government of the United States. It has its own legislature through rulings; its own executive power through court orders; and judiciary because there is no where to appeal its authority. Does this sound like America or Cuba?

    • Vcguy4u

      It should be illegal to both be a politician and know whom has donated to you and for donors to inform politicians that they have donated to them.  It is very difficult to bribe someone when they have no idea where the money came from.  Furthermore only people (not entities) should be allowed to donate money.  Entities such as corporations and unions are composed of people therefore if those people wish to contribute they are free to do so indiviually. Lastly, money should be limited to a reasonable amount which is attainable by even citizens of the lowest means. If money is speech regular people will never be heard.  If the majority of people in the country feel that thier voice is not being heard then there is left only one course of action.  The will eventually be heard! 

    • Lckrem

      Admit the shame of what you have done. Let the electorate speak-not the dollars.

    • Dante Ramicone

      Money corrupts.  Political money corrupts absolutely!

    • Peter Tasker

      The amount of money unleashed in elections this year (as already seen in the GOP primaries) has increased citizen skepticism about our democracy and discourages people from participating across the board.  I have to believe that you, the Supreme Court justices, do not want this to happen!

    • Cathy_marie

      If Montana wins then there is no stopping the rest of us!

    • Dale H. Buckmaster

      Corporate control of government is fascism. Is that what the court supports?

    • Eric

      Everyone knows that money buys influence.
      we cannot have this type of system so embedded in this country.
      We are on a very slippery slop, that seems to be unstoppable.
      We will be a Banana Republic in no time if this does not stop.
      And only the very wealthy will have rights that were suppose to be available to everyone in this great country.
      It is not only wrong but disgusting that we are at a point where we’re even talking about this.
      so keep money out of politics, and let’s limit the time that politicians can campaign from 4 yrs or 6 yrs whatever the office is.
      To just 2 months, that would keep alot of the money out!!!

    • Dharmon_arch

      It’s very simple: there’s a difference between a plutocracy and a democracy.
      I hope enough people weigh in to keep us from being slowly drowned out.
      “Citizens United” must be reversed.

    • teriyakijones

      It is antithetical to the concept of democracy that it be bought and sold. Get money OUT of politics instead of facilitating its continuing incursion.

    • Liktarnikk

      Worst Supreme Court judges ever!
       

    • Psmoser

      Ignoring legal precedents that date back to 1907 is anything but deliberate and respectful of the law.  But beyond that, the nature of this decision is so poisonous and so antithetical to the values of the republic that it is hard to believe.  Once money becomes free speech in all cases, and corporations have all the rights of individuals, our country is finally and unambiguously bought and sold.  We know that 92% of all elections are won by those who spend the most money, so what what fate is the Supreme Court imagining they are creating for the country?  Though supposedly impartial, the court has frequently been on what has proven to be the wrong side of major questions facing our society, so in some ways this current situation is not surprising.  Slavery, child labor, unionizing–the court has opted to side with the most powerful moneyed interests, at least initially.  I am going to be optimistic and believe that eventually the court will get this right.  With luck it will happen before the democratic character of the country is a smoking ruin.

    • Blackburnreba

      Please reverse your Citizens United ruling, it has destroyed our democracy.

    • Jealford53

      I am truely tired of “the best congress money can buy.”

    • bobandinge

      The only lobbyist “We the People” have are members of voters’ elected Congress. The Supreme Court now has enabled our “lobbyist” to buy and control our Government, “We the People“ are left with nothing.

    • greensachs

      I work hard everyday, we are falling further and further behind.  We can’t afford healthcare, dental or vision while working low-paying service jobs.  Vacation, discretionary spending, retirement, not on the radar.  It’s all we can do to keep our phone and put economical (non-nutritional) food on the table. 
      We have college debt, transportation is difficult, utilities are a growing strain.  Raising a child in this challenging environment just would not be prudent. 
      We are very much aware that our situation is becoming the new norm.  We all should NOT stand for the grotesque inequality in today’s America.  A broad swath of the population no longer has a voice.  The plutocratic elite and narrowing middle class are on the political/media agenda.  The working impoverished do not warrant thought, in fact it’s best if we’re not recognized. 
      Those with the deepest of pockets ever manipulating ($$$) a system in their narrow behalf (often corrupt) might be forced to see things as they are or heaven forbid, introspection.
      We’ll do our best to keep a good attitude but the moral arch of America is inverting with the help of 9 servile, unelected ideologues in black robes.

    • Stilts19

      The entire history of “corporations are people” has a dubious past, starting with blatantly corrupted rulings by Justice Stephen Johnson Field, in favor of the railroads, of which he was personally invested. Justice Field did more to push the concept of “corporate personhood” than perhaps any other politician or jurist. The idea that a Board of Directors can give the company’s money to one candidate, regardless of the fact that many investors in said company DO NOT hold the same political views is alarming and mystifying. How can a corporation “speak” ( through political donations) for the entirety of the shareholders? It is time that this concept be abandoned and corporate money gets OUT of politics. The concept of a government with “checks and balances” has been perverted into a government of “cheques” and is most assuredly off-balance! The persons that benefit from these corporate donations are the VERY PERSONS that are the ones who PASS THE LAWS to LIMIT the influence exerted BY THESE DONATIONS!!! It’s the classic conundrum of the fox guarding the hen house. That flies DIRECTLY in the face of the Founding Fathers attempt to strike a balance between the branches of OUR government. It is a fatal flaw that will surely doom this society, as surely as the Roman Empire failed. Or the Ancient Greeks. It’s time for YOU, OUR elected official to DO YOUR JOB and work FOR THE PEOPLE!

      • Nnnooccc

        Well done.  I hope they know what their “JOB’ is – doesn’t seem they do know and working ‘FOR THE PEOPLE’ hasn’t been apart of the job for decades.

    • Cassie

      This is not the America I grew up in, and I am certain our Founding Fathers would be appalled at what has happened to the Supreme Court over the last 20 years. How can these people possibly be called “Justices”? How many alarms need to be sounded before our citizens wake up and do something?

    • Antikorpp

      Anyone who has traced the history of the 1886 Southern Pacific Railroad vs. Santa Clara knows that it was a clerks notation in the decision that was used to equate corporation rights with peoples rights. We have accepted this fiction for too long, and the citizens united decision may just be what was needed to change an obviously flawed and partisan supreme court decision.

      • Stilts19

        True. “Justice” Stephen Fields was one of the justices that ruled FOR the railroads in that case, using clauses in the Reconstruction Act and the 14th Amendment to justify endowing corporations with rights intended for freed slaves. Field himself injected “corporate personage” language into subsequent rulings, some having NOTHING to do with corporations! This concept has been introduced FROM THE BEGINNING to line the pockets of the 19th century railroad tycoons!

    • Darrah

      It is unfortunate that your ruling is destroying our democracy. When a single millionaire or billionaire from this country, as well as foreign countries, can buy our presidential election, we can no longer call the United States of America a democracy. We must look ridiculous in the eyes of the world. We say we are a country “of the people, by the people and for the people.” This is no longer true. Reverse your decision and give the country back to all of the people — not to just of few of the wealthiest.  

    • Celiaeberle

      If our democracy crumbles as a result of the increased imbalance of power associated with wealth, even an institution like the Supreme Court will become meaningless.

      • Lisakidd1970

        In my opinion the Supreme Court is already meaningless. I would hate to have to put a decision on my life in their hands!

        • Nnnooccc

          Bulls eye!  You are on target.

    • Chcnc2009

      Before this decision we knew that it would be bad for our democracy, now that it is in effect we have ‘negative’ proof that it was the worst decision for this country, a corporation which has extraordinary wealth compared to the average citizen can use untold amount of money from domestic or foreign corporation annoynomously!!! Talk about a Manchurian Candidate effect, wow!! 

    • marty

      It is illegal for any foreign agent or entity to monetarily support a candidate for office. Citizens united abolishes the ability to enforce that law. it should therefore be overturned or at least highly scaled back to include verifiable tracking on every dollar received. one may have the right to free speech, however not the right to free anonymous speech.

      also if a state or federal law limits a person from donating more than a certain amount, that should also apply here. this would then limit any entity or person from donating more than 2300 dollars to the presidential fund. if multiple employees give then fine, however the company cannot do that in the employees’ names but they have to sign off personally.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mort-Walco/1134559758 Mort Walco

      “Unless you become more
      watchful in your states and check the spirit of monopoly and thirst for
      exclusive privileges you will in the end find that…the control over your
      dearest interests has passed into the hands of these corporations.”  President Andrew Jackson

    • Mkelly

      Allowing a corporation or SuperPac to donate unlimited sums of money to a candidate’s campaign is tantamount to giving it as many votes as it can buy with the unfair influence. The Supreme Court may as well have just handed every business in the country a free pass into the voting booth!  One man/woman, one vote, please, NOT one corporation/SuperPac, unlimited votes!

    • Drydocklaz

      The judges that voted for Citizens United should hang their heads in shame. Look at the monster you have created!!

    • Lee Henry

      It is there for all to see what Citizens United has produced:  It is allowing those with vast sums of money to “BUY” our elections!  To spend the kind of money that the United States IS spending on elections is truly obscene.  Someone should be elected based on their merits, not by how much money they spend in order to influence others with unending and expensive ads!  Your ruling was misguided and must be corrected.  Right now!! 

    • R Dieringer

      Reverse Citizens United !  Politics and our government need to be FREE of Corporate Money’s Influence.

    • Lisa Kidd

      I am so ashamed of what the Supreme Court has turned this great country into. Citizens United has all but taken away our republic and democracy. Americans could always take pride in the fact that no matter how little we had we always had a voice and sadly today thanks to Citizens United this is no longer true because our voices have been silenced by big money. Shame on the Judges who did this thinking only of themselves and their own political views….after all we all know that most of these money machines are going to support the Republican party. A Judge should be thinking of all of the people in this country not trying to line their own pockets. It should be a huge honor and responsibility to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Not only have you all but destroyed any sense of fairness in this country but the respect and honor of the Supreme Court of whom I have no trust in anymore. Do the right thing and get rid of Citizens United……give our voices back.

      • Nnnooccc

        After decades of studying the Supreme Court I know that asking it to “give our voices back” is not the answer.  We now must DEMAND our voices be heard!

    • Stephen Hyk

      The Supreme Court Justices who supported this Citizen United ruling are the following, Alito, Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, all appointed by the republican Presidents Bush and Reagon.  Justices opposed were, Sotomayer, Kagan, Breyer, Ginsburg, all appointed by Democratic Presidents Clinton and Obama.  Now you know the whole story about Citizen United.  Corporations are not people, they do not breath air, Die, Pay Taxes, or make decisions that affect peoples lives.  The Republican Justices sold us all down the river without a life line.  Reverse the decision now before it is to late, Hold the Justices responsible for their actions and hold court to correct this problem.  This is a sorry excuse for Justice without representation of the People by the Constitution.

    • Are-gee-jay

      The GOP appointees on this court are as crooked as the politicians who appointed them. Just-us for All.

    • dArtagnan3

      Our system of democracy is currently bent to the will of the rich and powerful. Politicians can only win elections via expensive media coverage and they often obtain such coverage via large money donations to their campaigns or PACs. The large donations are made primarily to those politicians who are known to protect the interests of the donors. So the interests of one large donor can outweigh the interests of millions of people who donate less.  This egregious situation has been distorting our democracy for two centuries but the Citizens United decision has intensified it to a new and unacceptable level.  We the People have now woken up to the problem and will settle for nothing short of a major change in how we finance elections.  The current system is tantamount to legalized bribery. In our democracy, one person should get one vote and a person’s money should never be allowed to buy influence over government decisions.  

    • Kevin

      Unlimited money is not just an appearance of conflict of interest, it fosters an environment where politicians are DEPENDENT on those funds in order to win public office.  At what price should we sell our democracy?  To me, it is far too precious to be put on sale….

    • Kanter_c

      Corprations are not people. Corporations are financed by stock and bond holders like me. The money they are frittering away on Super Pacs should be either reinvested in the corporation or given to us as dividends. From every aspect imaginable, this destruction of our capital is bad for us, bad for the corporations and bad for the nation.

    • Barbara

      It’s not that our Democracy is merely in peril, at this point in actuality, our Democracy no longer exists.  Our Political System is “OWNED” by Special Interest, those with unlimited money, and untold Foreign Interest with unknown agendas.  If the Supreme Court does not reverse the Citizens United Ruling now, we may not get another opportunity to reclaim our Democracy. 

    • Rackem49

      Please, please, please!!! Reverse this horrible, unpatriotic, illogical decision! I’m sure you will all live comfortably without the money you’re getting to push this heinous decision through.

    • Loustachura

      This is 1984.  All people are equal, but some people are more equal.

    • Beth Hickey

      From this point on all I can hope for is the billionaire or the few billionaires who buy the elections are benevolent and allow me , the serf, to continue to live in their country such as it has become……..Bought and Paid For.  I am seventy-four years old.  It is much too late to find somewhere else to live. 

      • Nnnooccc

        Yes, “It is much to late to find somewhere else to live”.  We Seniors must stay here and fight for our country as we always have in the past.  We may not change the course of events in our lifetimes, but the powers that be will be looking over their shoulders while we are still here on earth – and hopefully centuries thereafter.

    • Bobbie

       
      On January 21, the 2 year anniversary of Citizen’s United,I was mourning the Supreme Court definition that corporations can donate any amount of money into politics, and that money is considered “speech..” That offends me enough, but you voted that they needn’t even provide transparency.
       
      Please explain to me the following:
      .  How is this good for the common good for America and democracy?
       
      .  Please explain to me how a corporation is a person?
          .  Is it born from a human?
          .  Is it flesh and blood?
      Does it worry about the next generation of human beings?
       
       Don’t corporations have more money than me, who has the above attributes, that they can use for their corporate advantage?
       
      I need your answer. 

    • Leigh Haber

      To me the problem is not just about Citizens United, but about how badly the Supreme Court has tarnished its own reputation. For the first time in my life, I feel that the Court is bought and paid for, that it has failed to hold itself up to a higher standard.  My children, who are well-informed recent college graduates, feel a cynicism towards the Court that is new to me.  Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from the health care ruling in light of his own comments and his wife’s activities, but beyond that, Justice Roberts should look inward, and also towards history, and ask himself whether the damage he and his Court have done to the Court’s standing can be undone.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/GZ45QP42I2LQ4OE2GI2XTK3YEE larry

      Members of the Court: I understand the Court’s reasoning based on the arguments presented that money is a form of speech and shouldn’t be restricted, however the idea that corporations can participate in any political activity at any level is without merit. Although corporations have been elevated to human status, by certain legal definitions or conventions, that make it easier to apply laws and rules to their interactions, they are not human and are not entitled to rights and protections afforded to humans by the Constitution. The question of allowing political participation(contributions, solicitations, donations and campaign participation) by corporations because of their interest in laws and regulations that affect them is easily answered by observing and acknowledgeing that corporations are composed of people, employees, shareholders and customers who all have votes and can support or disagree with laws and regulations that affect the corporation. Providing for corporate participation in the political process disadvantages those of us who are not corporate participants and consequently have our vote diluted by a form of double voting by corporate associated participants.

      Larry Ripley 

    • Georgeecomer

      If you believe what you did in Citizen’s United is in the best interest of our Democracy God Help You, because big business interests don’t follow this principle. Big busines is only interested in how to improve their short term profits, so the top folks can get the next promotion. They would destroy the environment to accomplish this if needed. If it matters I’m a registered independant.

    • C Back

      We must always be sure that the peoples’ money is adequate to override the monied people!

    • Bill Meiners

      Freedom of Speech, yes, but freedom to spend unlimited sums to skew our democratic process and remain anonymous, no. Only a naive fool could think that PAC money doesn’t influence elected officials decisions.Buying decisions favorable to one’s economic class, corporation, union, etc. is not the way our democracy is supposed to work and definitely not what the framers of our constitution had in mind. Is this Lincoln’s country “…of the people, by the people and for the people…” or do you want to create a country of the people, by the people and for the rich?

    • Doug

      No one that I know can understand how a company can be considered to be a person or what cash has to do with freedom of speech. The one thing that everyone does understand is that now,thanks to Citizens united, no cash means no voice. The Supreme’s have not only spit on the little people with their decision they have now placed us on a dangerous path where everything is for sale. It appears that they not only sold us (the people) out but have sold themselves also. Nothing good will come from this so rethink your decision on this one please. Companies are not people and cash is not freedom of speech so apply some common sense like the rest of us do

    • Mcalarneyg

      We the People now have the best Supreme Court money can buy. Congratulations to the One percent, you not only own congress but now have a Supreme Court to go along with it. Great job!

      • Larenwilliams

        Would they like some fries with that?  Is the only job I’m able to get.  Their money would be better spent lifting up their fellow Americans rather than putting them out of work.

    • Robert Burnett

      Our democracy is threatened when small individual donations are so thoroughly overwhelmed and made insignificant by large corporation donations.  

    • Philitaly Pete

      Shame on those(you know who you are) who sold out or had an out of body moment. You are now being provided an opportunity for a do over, an opportunity I am sure you will pass on. American exceptionalism expired in my middle years and is now just a wonderful memory, it was great while it lasted.

      • Laren Williams

        Becoming an Ex-Patriot is sounding better all the time because of the havoc the wealthy and greedy have wreaked on this country.

    • Drobins

      To SCOTUS:
      I know  you are obligated to serve your Corporate/Republican masters, but didn’t you take an oath the serve the PEOPLE?
      PEOPLE = living breathing human beings. CORPORATION = a man-made convenience.  Surely with all your education you ought to be able to grasp that concept.
      Save your souls and show us what hopefully is left of your integrity. Reverse Citizens United….

    • Rdaughn5096

      To The United States Supreme Court:  Please consider this decision carefully and with fairness!  The future of Our Glorious Country depends on it! 

    • JD Adam

      You are guilty of crimes against the American People.  Your 2000 Coupe working out for you?  It certainly has brought the world to it’s knees with curses for your treason then and with Citizens United now.  Even if we believed you just “made a mistake” you have the responsibility to clean it up, and ours to insure you never get to make the same one again!

    • Tomcapps

      Citizens United represents Liberty And Justice for the Rich and Powerful-shame on the members of the Supreme Court who voted for this.

    • Bob Terry

      How in the world can ‘We the people” be participants in our form of democracy, when the few, by virtue of their wealth, steal our votes and make them worthless.  It is amazing that those same Supreme Court justices, who espouse strict interpetation of our Consititution, can willy nilly allow our form of government to be bought by the corporate few.  They must revisit ‘Citizens United’ and disavow their previous erroneous judgement and declare the purchase of the US government as null and void…

    • Caroline Ellis 85750

      As a Senior voter, I am deeply distraught at the conclusion I’ve now drawn that my election ballot no longer counts a whit.  My friends and I are old enough to have seen, experienced and learned a lot in our lifetimes– and what I continually hear among my cohorts is the comment “I am so glad my parents did not live to see this day in our Democracy.” 
      What is happening is appalling — unthinkable, really! Who could have believed that Corporations would be permitted to wield such power over The People. Sadly, the lessons of history are being repeated on so many fronts in our world today. Our ancestors and our Founding Fathers understood that in all things there must be moderation–and to that end they put in place  checks and balances that would preserve our Democracy and guide America safely into the future. And that principle worked for many many years. 
      I believe, without question, that our Founders intended for one living breathing flesh and blood person to equal one vote, and over the years our citizens have fought and died, and continue to do so, for that right. Now money is buying our elections.
      Please, using what you now know is happening, revisit the Citizens United decision and find a way to mitigate the problem before all of our elections are auctioned off to the highest bidder.  Caroline Ellis

    • Mclaughlin_nancy

      All political donations should be placed in a central account and be equally divided among all the candidates.  We would then be concentrating on what the person will do, if elected.  This would allow for an equal fair and just election process.  We would be restoring the American dream that everyone has a voice regardless of the social status.  It would open the door for more people to aspire to run for office. 

      • Nnnooccc

        I wonder how many would “aspire to run for office” if the money was taken out of the process and term limits were set for all elected and appointed officials in each branch of the government.  Unlimited terms in office and the lifetime appointments of the Supreme Court Justices have not proven a deterrent to outside influences and corruption.

        Or, or we approaching the day when we must separate ourselves from the current government as our Constitution states may be the only solution to “alter or abolish it” and to “Form a New Government”?  A new form of government may be our last resort once again.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Margaret-Bennett-Back/1048873139 Margaret Bennett Back

      For the people, by the people, of the people. Used to be that you could count on your vote counting. Used to be that you could feel that your political contributions meant something. Used to be that a person did not have to be a millionaire or know one to even compete for a PUBLIC SERVICE position. Used to be that I never had to worry about my choice of candidate getting drowned out by the political contributions of ONE SMALL GROUP of 1% ers. Now, I have to feel that i have to contribute more than i can afford to make it so my choice of person stays in the race! Really SCOTUS? Allowing unlimited money corrupts. Allowing unlimited money makes it so that the average American’s voice doesn’t stand a chance against the millions another American can put towards their agenda. My first amendment rights are eclipsed by the 1% rights because they have the cash to crush anyone they do not like. Anyone that stands for the 99%. You have done our country the greatest disservice.

    • Brbainton

      Dear Supreme Court Justices

      Please review and comment — Where does it say anything legal fictitious persons (i.e. corporations)?

      “The Declaration of Independence

      IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

      The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

      When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
      people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
      another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
      equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle
      them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
      should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
      equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
      Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
      Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
      among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
      –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
      ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
      institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
      organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
      effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that
      Governments long established should not be changed for light and
      transient causes;…”
       

      • Nnnooccc

        YES !!!

    • E paquin

      many years ago I read a fantasy where governments had disappeared and the world was run by corporations.  If I remember correctly pepsi cola had an army.  I thought it was a fantasy but unless something happens to change things government as we know it will disappear.  how nauseating it is to see played out every day the role that money plays in our democracy.  it’s up now for control by the highest bidder.  Your ruling that corporations are people has backfired and you need to revisit that ruling and change it.  there should be a level playing field for candidates that’s based on their beliefs, not their bankroll

    • Craig R Bishop

      As an astute observer of our current state of constitutional affairs opined recently, “I won’t believe corporations are human until Texas executes one”. Absurd? So was the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.

    • Mark

      I am 54 years old. I have always thought of the supreme court as a non partisan institution, until 2000 when you annointed GW Bush as president over states rights to decide themselves. Now with Citizens United, you once again show your political leanings.

      Things have progressed backwards ever since then, culminating with this terrible (Citizens United) ruling that corporations have the right to influence elections. Add to this, allowing filty rich individuals to effect elections in states they do not live in and in unlimited amounts, is the greatest threat to democracy this country has ever seen.

      You are supposed to be the defender of the constitution and instead you have done it and this country the greatest injustice we have ever seen. SHAME ON YOU! 

      CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE!

      Mark

    • Robert Suppe

      For me this issue has been particularly disappointing! To put it simply how in the world can we possibly have a government of the people, by the people, and for the people if corporate and big money interests are allowed to influence the outcomes so easily simply by throwing unlimited sums of money behind those they wish to see in office. Knowing full well those same people they help to elect will serve their interests exclusively because if they do not those same corporate and wealthy individuals will just put their money behind someone else who will do what they want the next election cycle. The Citizens United decision ensures that elected officials essentially are slaves to the will of those who can afford to buy them into office which means those elected to office are not there to serve all the people, only those who can afford to pay for that influence. Certainly this is not what the founding fathers intended. I believe that the Citizens United decision goes against everything that both the “Declaration of independence” and “The constitution of the United States of America” stand for.

    • David Tomasello

      The absurdity of the name Citizens United is fraud in itself.A more appropriate name would be Citizens Excluded.

    • Danzon1

      My father brought us to this country (legally) in 1952 for a better life.  They are doing well because they are 20 yrs older
      than I am.  My brother and I are not.  We are worried what will happen to us and our country.  The one thing we cherish
      in our family is our vote.  We may be losing the chance to make our vote count.  We are being eaten alive by greed and
      money.  I had always respected the Judges of the Supreme Court.  I felt that if things went wrong we could always count
      on them to do what is just and fair for all.  Guess what?  Not anymore.  You have lose my faith and trust in you.  You
      must turn over the Citizens United Decision.  It is one of or the worst decision that the Court has made.  My husband and I
      sometimes have tears in our eyes when we talk about how hopeless we feel about the freedom that seems to be slipping
      away for us and for others.  The rich are growing big and fat and greedy and will eat us alive if they are not stopped.
      It makes me sick to think of the money they are spending to buy more laws in their favor only to make more money.  Money
      that could be used to feed the sick and the hungry.  God help us!  Please do what is fair and just for our and your country!
      Thank You.

    • Phmcgregor

      It has been sickening to have the major networks constantly update the amount of money being spent on campaigns, in this economy particularly, with so many people struggling to find well paying work, and being unable to move to where jobs are because of lack of funds to do so.  Turns my stomach, how about you?

    • Marilyn Brown

      The Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court was the absolute worst ruling they have passed in the life of the Supreme Court.  It has enabled multiple super packs to “buy” our government and our election.  We must retain the form of democracy that our forefathers formed many years ago.  It sets the guidelines for other governments through out the world and enables those governments who favor peace to exist.

    • Laren Williams

      Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely. Corporations ARE
      NOT PEOPLE! They are corporations that are in business solely to make money,
      whatever way they can.  They do what they
      have to do to get more of it in their pockets, even bribery and manipulation of our political
      figures. With all of these millions and billions they are spending in the
      political process, they could feed the world, pay off everyone’s medical bills,
      and pay off the student loan debt, go a long way to bring down the National
      Debt, save everyone’s houses from foreclosure. But, they are greedy and selfish
      and want more money than they could ever spend in a lifetime while the poor get
      poorer, and sicker, and further in debt while corporations hide behind their
      “Religious Right” attitude. I’m not seeing America as a proud United
      Country. We are now a Nation Divided. That’s not what the Founding Fathers envisioned
      for ALL of us. United We Stand, Divided we WILL fall. Corporate money has to be
      taken out of our Political Process once and for all, never to darken our
      doorstep again.  Consider it a failed experiment
      and let’s move on.

    • Ruthiejett

      Allowing our Democracy to be hijacked by those with great wealth is wrong. Money lobbying should have NO PLACE in our
      Political Process! This is corrupting our Liberty! Shame on those of you who voted this terrible decision into PLAY!

    • Ken Meersand

      Corporations are no more “persons” with 1st amendment rights, than my non-existent parakeet. How the Supreme Court used
      twisted logic to overturn decades and decades of stare decisis is a travesty that must be corrected. If it’s not, our Country will be a
      democracy in name only.

    • Phil Dodds for Congress

      I am running for U.S. Congress in 2012, with the sole aim of beating back the unfair influence over congress and to renew democracy.   We the people will succeed, with the help of the Supreme Court or not.  http://www.phildoddsforcongress.com

      Congress should represent the will of the people, first. 

      Like me on facebook people: http://www.facebook.com/PhilDoddsForCongress

    • Bridgeday88

      you should be ashamed of yourselves for such a ruling. undo it and save face and the country as we knew it.

    • Bud Doering

      Help put an end to corruption in politics and government. 

    • Garsgal2005

      Let all just admit it was the worst, biggest mistakes the court ever made.
      We have worked throught so many problems and we will work this one out too.

    • Leehvr1

      The Roberts Court has effectively opened up our government to the highest bidder, both foreign and domestic.  Now more than ever, congress and the Supreme Court represent whoever has the most money.  First the court made George Bush president, then it gave us Citizens United.  Now states have been emboldened to limit voting rights of U.S. citizens.  As never before, the Supreme Court represents a system of injustice.

    • judylamb

      Common sense should tell a person they don’t need 30 million dollars to win an election. We the people should elect politicians to office not we the people with money. It is plain wrong that super pacs and groups should be able to spend that much money to elect their people to office.

    • Robert Rusk

      The Court is on the wrong side of History, to coin a phrase. What I mean is that allowing these monies into 
      the political process distorts the meaning of democracy, which in it’s fundamental sense is the idea that “one person=
      one vote” when it comes to electing our representives, and that if our much corrupted system survives this wrong-headed decision we will look back on this episode with total disbelief & pure scorn.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Martinez/1708951229 David Martinez

      I am a %100 disabled military veteran.  I took an oath to uphold the Constitution.  It’s a shame our supreme court made a mockery of it with the Citizens United(and a few others) decision.  I used to think the Supreme court was our last bastion of sanity against politiciansl. No longer. Y’all can go suck eggs!

    • Rwsseward

      Citizens United is the ultimate Supreme Court Decession proving that politics out weighs that of justice.  There are Supreme Court Justices who should step down from their positions, based on their actions and affiliations with political parties.  There are Supreme Court Justices who have attended political party gatherings showing their support for this party and who pass laws that benefit their party affiliation.  I don’t have to name them, they know who they are.  They are a disgrace not only to the Supreme Court but to America.  They are bought off, corrupt justices.  You are the perfect example of what a Traitor is.  You knew what effect Citizens United would have in the political field and yet you passed it anyway.  When the President spoke of this during one of his addresses to Congress you shook your head and called him a liar.  You passed a law making companies people so they could flood the political process with money there-by changing the constitution of the United States.  This is no longer a government of the people by the people, it is now a government of Big Business by the Wealthy.  Who exactly do you work for anyway, the American People or Carl Rove or possibly Grover Norquist, WHO?  We all know you now pass laws based on the wants and needs of the Republican Party/1%, but what else have they exactly promised you to sell yourself out.  It must be pretty good for someone of your statur to sell yourselves out and disgrace yourself and the American People.  Over turn Citizens United, get money and billionaires out politics and then do us all a favor.  Step down in disgrace, do not collect retirement or pentions because you helped to strip all of us, the American People of that right and you deserve no better.  Just turn in your robes, hang your head down and just walk away.  I’m sure one of these billionaire buddies of yours have a nice CEO job for you somewhere.  JUST GO AWAY!!!!

    • Mgmatzek

      The baptism of corporations as citizens reminds me of the company store where corporations deliberately kept people broke and indebted. Now, stealing peoples labor, votes, rights, or whatever is being endorsed by a supreme court that is dedicated to its people?  How can that be?  It has made everyone I know angry and disgusted with the current system of government when it is the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

    • Gafgibfl

      “We The People….”  Our political process should always be influenced, directed and supported by the people of this nation.

    • Dmicallef21

      Due to “Citizens United”, for the first time ever it has become apparent that when someone says to me that “i don’t vote because my vote doesn’t really matter”, there is validity in this traditionally absurd statement that was once based in laziness. This statement is no longer absurd and it makes me ashamed to be an American when the People feel their voices do not matter and due to “Citizens United” its not because of voter laziness, its because of voter POWERLESSNESS. “Citizens United” must go. Please, draw a hard line of what is right and what is wrong.

    • Jeanne Carter

      The Supreme Court’s ruling on the Citizen’s united case
      gives Corporations and big money the power to bribe our politicians and buy
      their influence and it is wrong. 
      Although money does talk, it is not people and corporations are not
      people.  I want “government of the
      people, by the people and for the people” back as our founders envisioned all
      those years ago. 

      What has happened to the Supreme Court?  It’s an embarrassment!  

    • Joseph Andrews

      Sadly, the U.S. Supreme Court has so badly interpreted our Constitution that they have effectively taken away something I’ve treasured as a U.S. citizen for all my life, (75 yrs) and that’s my ability to vote and speak up for those I support. But now I realize that I have no chance to be heard anymore.  my voice is completely drowned out by the hundreds of millions of dollars that are being spent by huge corporations  and extremely wealthy individuals to influence the government for their own greedy and selfish desires.i find myself with tears in my eyes every time I think about it, but there is really no reason for me to even vote anymore.  I guess that’s exactly what the Court hoped would happen. Most of us played by the rules.  They didn’t.  They won.  Democracy is lost.

    • Kdmeans

      Corporations are made up of many people yet corporations can speak with one voice.  Please explain?  Money is certainly not
      speech.

    • Rjmcalevey

      WE THE PEOPLE. HA. It should be amended to read “We the corporations and billionaires”  Oh I’m sorry you have already decided that corporations are people!!!  This, as we used to say in the military, is BS.  Please stop corporations and billionaires from buying our politicians and laws!!!!!

    • Ian Evans

      What ever happened to the days when politicians took their positions because it was an honor and they wanted to do better by this country?  Currently, we are lost as a nation and a big reason is because large corporations and billionaires get to make all the decisions.  We need to take big money out of politics and restore the honor that used to exist when taking a political post.  Only then will the Democracy finally return and people be held accountable for their actions.  This country needs to be wonderful again and getting big money out of politics is a great start!  It is a shame that politicians make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, take vacations without passing a budget, but not before giving themselves raises, and you have teachers, fire fighters, police officers, parole officers, etc being cut by the hundreds because this country is failing.  Restore American to it’s greatness!  

    • Jprestage2@bellsouth.net

      Bravo to McCain and Whitehouse!!! Crossing party lines in order to take a courageous stand against money buying political favor.  How absurb  in the land of the free and the home of the brave, freedom that McCain knows too well comes at a great price – freedom is not  free but it cannot and should not be bought with money.  The Supreme Court made a grievous mistake when it allowed Citizens United to influence its decision.  One only has to look at the millions upon millions of dollars spent by big money in this year’s election even in the face of talks of cuts and more cuts to many who are out of work and out of hope.  The Court would do well to listen to the voice of the people.  The Court and the Congress have no honor. 

    • Mansilver

      Of all the wonderful classes I took in grade school, no hour a week was more compelling that my civics class. I learned that it is my right and duty to participate in our democracy. That as long as we all vote and speak out to improve our country and fellow countrymen and women, we will be assured of a fair and just society. The passing of “Citizens United,” was the darkest day in our democracy’s history. The justices who voted in favor of this decision have robbed all citizens of the only power we have to be a viable part of our democracy. Now corporations with endless amounts of money that have been gained through ordinary citizens, control politics. The individual’s vote has been reduced to a cynical side show. The Citizens United decision is a disgrace to our country. The stature of the Supreme Court has demeaned itself when justices rubber stamp the desires of Big Business and the Republican Party’s most insidious right-wing ideologues who believe that justice only belongs to the wealthy and powerful.
      I have successfully petitioned my town, Mount Rainier, MD, to pass a resolution demanding that we amend your destructive decision. Along with other cities, states and townships we the people, will turn the country back into a place where one person one vote is the rule. We won’t stop until it is overturned and we know that we are on the side of what is right and just in a true democracy. We will not be intimidated or bought off. 
      The only upside of this travesty is that most of Americans want an amendment to end your lifelong terms as judges. You should have to convince all of us, not just Congress, that you are fit to represent the entire country and that the scales of justice are balanced. If you want to destroy the country, we the people should at least be able to vote you off the bench before you do any more harm.

    • Ryan Jansen

      Money out!  Honest men and women in!

    • James Taylor

      Your Honors, Nelson Mandela has said, countless times, that freedom is not divisible.  The chains you place upon our people, the REAL people, are the chains that will bind you as well, and your children, and their children, in perpetuity!  You have given fictitious entities, corporations which were originally formed for the purpose of avoiding liabilities, the same rights you give to actual humans, citizens of this nation.  Yet under law, you cannot give them responsibilities commensurate with the rights you have bestowed upon them, and you did not even try to do so.  Now, your honors, it is time for you to admit you were wrong and amend your terrible blunder.  You can do this voluntarily, now, or under compulsion later on.  The choice is yours.

    • Linda russell

      With this ruling, Democracy began to disappear as a few very rich people can influence so many with, at times, too many times, lies paid for and run as adds. I have only one vote. How is this fair? I hate the corruption as much as I love my country. I am so disappointed in the supreme court. it has become less than meaningless.  It has become subverted. How can they live with themselves?

    • J. Keith

      It is very disheartening to see what is happening in our country.  Super Pacs and affluent partisans are riding high these days reaching for the brass ring that will assuage their hunger for power.  The Supreme Court has made a very grave error and should reconsider the Citizens United ruling. 

    • Daveharpe

      There was a time when judges valued credibility and tried to make decisions that would be well reasoned, and stand the test of time. They would not have liked to have their names attached to any ruling that is poorly reasoned, has the smell of corruption, or obviously violates the United States Constitution. This was especially true of the United States Supreme Court, the highest court in this nation. Although they are appointed for life, and can not be over ruled, they still cared what legal historians would say about them long after they are gone. It is in your hands to reverse recent rulings such as “Citizens United”, or to let them stand as your legacy, and a monument to you. How do you want to be remembered?

    • Margaret Stockoer

      As a consequence of Citizens United, we do not have needed election reform.  On the contrary we have a situation in which countless unknown dollars are being used to “purchase” elections.  These dollars can come from anywhere and from any special interest group.  I believe EVERY campaign add or expense should be approved by the candidate.  There should be NO unsubstantiated and unapproved (overtly) campaign ads or statements.
      Pleae overturn Citizens United and make it at least a little bit harder to allow unsubstantiated information to be used.

    • Susan McDaniel

      Your Honors, I hope you can see the damage that big money is doing to our election process. It would be better to remove money completely instead of opening the doors to allowing a few rich people to have so much say in our elections – it is destroying our democracy. As well as destroying the idea of one vote one person,bBig money often sends out lies and misinformation to the public. Just when we need to be really smart to make decisions, we dumb down because of the power of money. Please reverse that terrible decision!

    • lgarrett

      the consititution says we the people. not we the corportations.

    • Marcybobh

      Marcia Hollis  It is very sad to see our country being ruined by greed.  The average person could never run for any office because they could not afford it.  Please overturn this ruling, it is destroying our democracy.

    • BGS

      I object to the concept of a corporation as a person.  A corporation is not a single individual but an organization dedicated to the
      profit of its stockholders.  It’s unethical to permit it to use $$ to employ an overwhelming unfair advantage and sway individual voters in the political realm.  The Supreme Court is already denified for its vote to allow a inept president into office who started 2 painful and unpopular wars.  Don’t assist those bent on turning our democracy into an oligarchy into another black mark on this set of  Supreme Court justices.

    • Kowalchuk

      Stop letting the wealthy purchase politicians who they
      know will do their bidding when they are voted into office. We all know it
      happens but to blatantly allow it to be thrown in our faces is a shame on the
      beliefs that the Supreme Court will do the right thing.

    • Mike

      Please set aside your political agenda and let the people decide whether they want corporations to buy elections.  It is not up to you.  It is up to us.

    • Rivrwood

      I’m over 80, have voted in every presidential election since I became 21.  I think overturning of this law was the most irresponsible  thing the US Supreme Court has ever done.   This act, has upset the whole process.    WHAT WERE YOU THINKING??

    • J Donohue

      We need a Supreme Court that recognizes the rights of citizens over corporations.  Corporations are not people and I don’t care how you try to word it – only people are people.  Thanks  to the Supreme Court, we are becoming more corrupt than any 3rd world country.  In fact I cannot even say the words “supreme court” without a look and feel of total disgust moving over me like a plague.

    • http://rickbasora.newsvine.com/ Rick F. Basora

      Justices Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy, you stand to be written into history as the men that ushered in the new “United States of Corporate America” and its new 21st century theme of “government of the people, by the wealthy and for the corporations.” President Obama was right to expose you during his first State of The Union Address and this, Citizens United, your most un-American endeavor .

      Your Honors, if you believe that ”corporations are people,” why then did you not limit them to ONE vote each…. like all other Americans? Instead you empowered them with the right to “purchase” millions of “misinformed” votes with only their own financial self-interest, not the country’s, in mind. In light of your ruling, it seems oh so ironic that today in the State of Florida, a teacher can be fined, jailed or both for the “unforgivable crime” of registering students to vote. Sirs, is such voter suppression constitutionally acceptable to you? Further, if you truly believe that “money is speech,” many of us are left to conclude that, to you, the poor are but an irrelevant and ”voiceless” mass of pathetics. These, Gentlemen, are NOT the cannons upon which America was founded.

      Because power not tempered by wisdom and compassion defines TYRRANY, I feel respectfully compelled to remind you that THE TYRRANT fights ALL so as to “appear” to be right, and yet THE LEADER fights FOR ALL and for all that is right. Be LEADERS, America beseeches you, and not just the “judicial prostitutes” of knaves. Where such rulings are concerned, Bush vs. Gore was quite enough… or are we poised for yet another SCOTUS-sponsord coup d’etat in 2012? 

      America, Democracy, the world and your robes deserve better.

      • Nnnooccc

        Inspirational to this voter.

    • Louanne Rice

      When I heard of this decision I knew that marijuana had NOT been legalized for medical OR recreational use.  But I did wonder exactly what really HARD DRUG the Supreme Court had chosen to use while making decisions?!  Corporations are people?  That was just a joke….right?

      • Nnnooccc

        Is the HARD DRUG money, immense influence and privilege?  The Supreme Court is a part of the aristocracy of this country after all.

    • Rhonda

      There is absolutely no rational process by which a corporation can be equated to an individual human being. You can’t really be that stupid, and if you read these comments you’ll realize that not all Americans are stupid enough to buy it, either. We don’t all just accept what the corporate-controlled media feed us. Some of us actually research issues and form our own positions based on known facts. With the Citizens United decision you’ve made us irrelevant–our votes are overwhelmed by the voice of big business and its agenda. Our government should serve the needs of individuals, not cater to the greed of the one percent.

    • Laurie

      I’m 50 years old, married 29 years to my first love, three kids in their 20s–my husband has worked for corporations, started three of his own companies with mixed results, we’ve moved all around for opportunity. I’ve worked in school districts and for non-profits, and have always been involved and cared about our country’s political life. Like most Americans, we’re in this game with our heart and soul, and we love this country! When I read the Citizens United decision, I literally cried. It felt like the final kick of doom for this country, and the fact that this decision which makes NO LOGICAL CONSTITUTIONALLY JUSTIFIABLE SENSE came down from the Supreme Court, enforced my fear that political pawns have been planted within the Supreme Court. SO, since the Supreme Court is now apparently corrupted by partisan politics like everything other institutional body today, IT IS TIME for the American people to demand constitutional change.

      Be a part of this United Republic movement! And UR, you should consider a name change–it’s not obvious at all what you’re doing and you sound like yet another weird PAC or social government. I liked Dylan Ratigan’s Get The Money Out of Politics–that was really CLEAR in a very confusing world. 

    • Richard M. Davidson

      Money is entitled to speech?    If that is so SCOTUS wouln’t that mean that more money means more speech. Billionaires could speak from now until those proverbial cows arrive. What about the rest of us?

    • Rasher84

      Ashley
      The core beliefs that have guided this nation to greatness are being eroded one by one.  But for the Supreme Court to have agreed with Citizens United allowing billionaires to buy the government of their chosing is beyond comprehesion.  What happend to “government by the people”? Rethink this diasterous decision or you will be aiding the down fall of this democracy that you have sworn to uphold.  I am stunned that we cannot believe in justice even in the highest court in the land.  Please reverse this decision.
      Thank you.

    • Janet Thompson

      Individual voters are at a terrible disadvantage compared to the huge amounts of money thrown into campaigns, both at the local, state and federal level. It doesn’t make a lick of sense that in Wisconsin the recall election draws contributions of 25 to 1. And most of the money comes from out of the state, get real! “Freedom of Speech” has sure been carried to the ridiculous extreme.
      Many things are wrong with Citizens United and it needs to be repealed as soon as possible before it completely erodes our democratic process.
      Janet – Lakewood, CO

    • http://twitter.com/Jimmyin12D jimmyin12D

      Let’s keep this The United States of America, and not U.S.A. Inc.

    • Bigguy101

      This is a government by the people for the people not a government by the big businesses and the money people nor the super PAC. If I would pay to get people to vote my way it would be bribery and I would go to jail for it.  So why should the money people and the super PAC have the right to bribe our congress and to bribe the public officials to get their way.  It is hard for us senors and the elderly to be able to get the meds that they need and to buy  the food that they need to survive and to enjoy some of our golden years.  We paid into social security for years to be able to enjoy some of our final years and yet the money people want to take it away from us.  Congress calls this an entitlement but we paid into it for all our working years.  Do they pay into theirs.  They should look at their entitlements and give us a break and give up some of their entitlements.  Business and the Super PAC
      should not be able to buy the government.  I am asking the Supreme court to reverse CITIZENS UNITED right away.  If this goes on to long we will our United States and we will become a third world country. I feel sorry for the younger generation because they will not be able to see the real reason that the USA was founded in the first place.

    • Davidwc50

      Allowing corporate executives to have a separate voice from their private voice gives them a political advantage over other citizens simplying on the basis of their job status. This is supposed to be a Democratic Republic, not Plato’s Republic. This was a partisan decision. It is a disgrace to American Freedom.

    • Ian

      I immigrated to the wonderful USA because I believed in the freedom and democracy it promised.
      It truly angers me that corporate money and special interest lobbying now wholly defines the direction of the legislature.
      Get the money out!

      • Nnnooccc

        We have been fighting for freedom and democracy in America since it’s inception.  It is a daily battle fought on multiple fronts year after year and forever.  Freedom and democracy don’t come easily or without great sacrifice on the part of it’s citizens.  A promise of freedom and democracy is not a guarantee, but rather our opportunity to achieve and maintain it. Welcome to our never ending struggle!

    • Jroyhiggins

      truth and honesty need to return to politics 

    • Earl Minter

      The Citizens United decision is the worst decision ever for democracy and should be reversed or the supreme court should be replaced!

    • Burley Fulbright

      We have to get the money out of politics!

    • Fdt

      The opinion of the American people is that our government is bought by the rich and powerful.  This decision just reinforces that opinion.  The Justices that voted for this ruling should be ashamed.  Our Constitution starts with “We the People”, not “we the superpacs”.

    • Roy Montana

      This court has shown how little it cares for the people of the United States by their vote for Citizens United. You should be thrown out for this miscarriage of justice. The law is what you think it should be and you are so wrong on this decision. Partisan politics should have no place at the Supreme Court and you should be ashamed. You wonder why people have no respect for authority and now especially for your court. Partisan bums..  

    • Ptb3791

      I believe Citizens
      United v. the FEC is the most heinous decision to come down from the Supremes since
      Dred Scott v. Sanford in 1857.  While I would never begrudge even my worst
      political foes the right of free speech, I you’re going to put out attack ads
      which often represent opinion as fact, you should have to disclose your donor
      list.  Some would site the NAACP v
      Alabama decision as precedent
      that the lists are private, but pouring billions into the process to buy
      elections is completely different than protecting political groups from attack
      by a racially bigoted state.  If it can be proven that
      your ad exceeds a certain score of lies to truth – score TBD – you should have to spend 2
      times the amount of the original ad buy in retraction ads – let the Koch Bros
      eat that!

    • Xtro181

      Citizen’s United has turned this once great democracy into an aristocracy!
      To quote Petronius Arbiter: “The courts are an auction where justice is sold; the judge that presides bangs a gavel of gold”. (Petronius, “The Satryicon”).

       

    • PoliticiansArebeingCorrupted

      “A state ruled by a tyrant or absolute ruler”: TYRANNY. You may note there is no part of the definition stating the purveyor of tyranny must be a living being. Stop and THINK, really consider how the political climate would change tomorrow if you removed the perverting influence of money in government. You remove the influence of money, the fear, corruption and pressure brought to bear BY MONEY on the people who were once elected to represent citizens instead of causes and corporations and a few billionaires who intend to reshape this country into their personal private country club? You would walk into Washington the day AFTER tomorrow and it would have become unrecognizable. There would BE no further reason for the business of the people to go undone or be perpetually frozen in deadlock because MONEY has made elections and campaigns into a NEVER ENDING PROCESS. Save our country while there is still a chance to back away from the cliff. GET BIG MONEY OUT OF GOVERNMENT NOW.

    • Abqactor

      When you give money equivalency to speech, you turn the democracy over to the marketplace, not to the forums of the day, as you believe, because if I have enough money, I can buy all the forums, or at least all the minutes that are available on those most public and persuasive of forums: our television screens.

    • Newsofal

      Thanks to the Supreme Courts inability to remain a-political “We The People” no longer have a voice that is loud enough to be heard by OUR elected representatives!  Corporations do not go to the polls, they do not vote, they do not fight our wars and they are not legal US citizens, yet they  have greater influence on who our next president will be than those of us who bleed for our country.  Right the wrong, revisit your ruling on Citizens United.  NOW!

    • Sally Grant

      I know deep down, you are all good people. Do what’s right and reverse this ruling before it is to late.

    • Woody25

      Our Constitutional Republic rests on two fundamental principles.  The first is that the primary purpose of government is to protect the unalienable rights of its citizens.  In the Declaration of Independence we used this as the legal basis explaining our right to break bonds with England.  The other principle is that Americans don’t trust power.  Power is the oxygen in which tyranny thrives.  This is why we divided power in government among three branches.  Corporations can wield power as well.  Sometimes, government is the only check we have on corporate power.

      The Citizen’s United decision protected the rights of non-citizens enabling non-living entities to drown out the free speech of the citizens government must protect.  At the same time, the increased non-citizen speech impairs the government’s ability to act on a check against power.

    • Newsofal

      Would Chief Justice Roberts openly discuss his views with the president now?  One can only hope!

    • Annejones

      It’s time to stop rationalizing the destruction of a representative republic that stands out as the crown jewel of freedom in all of human history—and time to start protecting it.

      • scon

        We Americans are going to have to protect our representative republic.  God only knows, the Supreme Court and an politicians are not going to protect us.

    • Davefilicko

      Your Honors:  Each of you has one life as each of us do.  Would you really allow this judgement stand in the face of possible total demise of this Nation?  In whose Hall of Fame will your name appear.  Is this really happening?  Is this why I joined the Army back in 1961.  Were any of you in any branch of the service?  You don ‘t fight for your country by giving it over to someone who may have gotten money from already doing no good to American citizens such as the insurance industry has, by keeping cash values when people die.  There are too many injustices which have gone on and are still going on.  Please do not add another.  WE the people; not WE the corporations is how it reads on a certain famous piece of paper.  Obviously it was not written by any of your majority.  But you do have a second chance.  Our forfathers did it right the first time.

    • Birdnip

      When CORPORATIONS can be JAILED as any PERSON who COMMITS A CRIME can be JAILED then a Corporation can be considered a person.
      Until then A CORPORATION IS NOT A PERSON.
      Has anyone gone to jail due to the FRAUD COMMITTED in the recent financial crisis? (OK not so recent. About 4 years ago.)
      If the Citizans United ruling continues our Democracy is doomed.

    • Ron Mears

      Dear Justices:  I ask you for the sake of our constitutional democracy to reverse your Citizens United Ruling.  Please do not allow the wealthy to continue to buy politcians.

    • greensachs

       The ignoble Supreme’s whom rule for the benefit of their overlords should never prosper so much that they lack the time to
      manage the nation’s wealth, as they are too busy counting up their own. Guess there remains no ruggedness, like that of privilege.

    • Kecheneny

      Please stop big business from trying to influence washington on election issues.
      Our country should be for the people and their best interests ….. not a few with large
      amounts of $$$$$ for their own gains over the common people. It’s not fair !!! 

    • Llogue82

      I believe this ruling has led to the increase in inflammatory political ads.  I want big money out of politics and the ability for politicians to hear the voice of the electorate.

    • Gelsei

      Since Corporations are people, you should give them Voting rights. The number of votes they get should be in direct relation to their corporate might! That way they dont have to spend money on lobby or on manpulative ads and they wold be much better off – except our Country of course, but you don’t give a damn. Only you have the power to proove me wrong!

    • Jmhenry01

      If we can’t get the money out of politics, “honest politician” becomes just another oximoron!

    • http://www.lulu.com/shop/dave-bell/time-experiments/paperback/product-2332302.html Dave Bell

      International corporations do not have the rights of American citizens. Even if corporations were people, the people in the corporation and stockholders are not all American citizens.

    • Tommytalkers

      I think it is very important that each person has the right of free speech, individually, not as a group,union, company, corporation,etc.  I was born and raised in Montana,  I believe Montanans are very practical, polite, and very careful to not infringe into other people’s business.  I think they have it right, again.  Corporations should not have the right to sway elections by the use of their huge financial advantage.  Money should be taken out of politics.  The press, broadcasters,internet providers, should provide time and space for political views to be seen.  We need very short campaigns, with NO advertising.

    • Michael Hayter

       Please protect my voice . . . I don’t have thousands of dollars to make my interests important to my elected representatives.  I want them to hear me because of my VOTE, not my MONEY!  PLEASE – this is so important in our democracy. 

    • Randyme

      Please find yourself a conscience and DO THE RIGHT THING. Stop selling yourselves to the highest bidder so that you may live in the lap of luxury while others have nothing. How rich do you have to be? Please reverse this ridiculously insane ruling which obviously was bought and paid for and let us all have a fair chance at the “American Dream” and not have to learn how to steal it like you did Mr. Thomas, Mr. Scalia and the rest of you crooked so called “justices who regularly attend “functions” put on by big business to sway your decisions and make you wealthy. You`re never gonna change and I know that this is a BIG waste of time so to you I say “Kiss my ass”, hurry up and expire.

    • Hemwatie Jaipershad

      I think it is wrong for those with a lot of money to buy influence and power in a democracy.  The very future of democracy is at stake under Citizens United.  The political process in the United States is still a great democracy in action and a model for the rest of the world.  Corporations, whether domestic or international, must not have the opportunity to buy influence at the expense of the American people.  Government must go back to being for the people and by the people.  All big money must be out of the political system for this democracy to survive. 

    • dee

      Citizens United does not speak for me or for my family.  The fact that donors can remain hidden is a frightening prospect. 

    • Stowersjoan

      “We the People” always meant something to me and should to every American. Each and every person should have the same amount of say in who will represent them. The average Joe or the down on their luck Jane should not have their voices drowned out by a corporation! I would like to believe that if I had the money to buy an election I would not do so. It isn’t fair and it isn’t American. Do you truly believe this is what our Founding Fathers envisioned for this great Country of ours? I don’t. I would hope that you reconsider and undo this injustice.

      • guest

        If “We the People” do not reengage in the process and function of our government, we will continue to find ourselves with heel of money, corruption and government decay on our throats as they are today.  We must stand up and demand to be counted as citizens – the Americans that built this country and the only people who can maintain it’s strength.  We must be ever vigilant as to the acts of our government, the desires, hunger, greed and corruption of those seeking power.  We, the American citizens are the strength of this nation.  

    • william lamborn

      Get the big money out of our politics. Set spending limits and length
      of campaign limits. I would like to see the lobbyists in the unemployment
      lines instead of our hard working middle class people.

    • HGrayDavis

      Citizens United decision is an indication that the Republican Supreme Court Justices are willing to allow corruption in our political process and turn it over to millionaires, billionaires and corporations. Corporations are not people. It is the duty of the legislative and executive branch to undo this calamity without regard to any bribery committment for pass/future campaign contributions. Bribery is the reason why a bipartisan effort by the executive and legislative branch to undo Citizens United hasn’t happened.

      The first three articles of the U.S. Constitution call for the powers of the federal government to be divided among three separate branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary branch. Under the separation of powers, each branch is independent, has a separate function, and may not usurp the functions of another branch. However, the branches are interrelated. They cooperate with one another and also prevent one another from attempting to assume too much power, i.e., aiding and abedding corruption of our democracy.

    • Gervase M. Bushe

      Corporations are not people. The right to free speech in the constitution applies to PEOPLE. period.

      • Nnnooccc

        Are we considered PEOPLE or a percentage or fraction of a person, if considered at all.  If we are considered for anything other than carrying the workload (including dying on the fields of battle) and supporting our aristocracy and government, it has escaped the notice of this American citizen.  Rather than ask the powers that be for our Constitutional rights as Americans, we must now demand that America and it’s people be heard, our Constitution acknowledged and respected.  If not, America will cease to exist as will we.

    • Lucy Rice

      It seems that all three branches of our government are corrupt.  Money wheels a big stick!  Get rid of the PACS and have nothing more than individual, as in one person, be able to donate…and have a reasonable cap on that.  Return our government to the people.  Bring back the basics of our Constitution, as our governing contract with the people!

    • juanbowtie

      Dear Supreme Court Justices,
      If you truly think corporations are people too, then I have two things to say.  Tax them as individuals and/or please retire.  No offense with the retirement thing, but you’re obviously senile and need to retire.

    • Barbara Martinelli

      Common sense should have prevented the Citizens United decision.  Now it is obvious to all of us, even those who benefit from it, that it will destroy our democracy.  Please correct this error while we still have a voice. 

    • saliheser

        Where i come from we used said, Fish rotten head done, if you think about that goes a long way and now includes not only most POLITICIANS & CAPITALISTS,SUPREME COURT also.

    • Berkeley Liberal Voter

      Reverse the Citizens United ruling. Give the people back their democratic republic.

    • Nancy Parker

      I believe my point of view is every bit as important as Exxon’s, but their money does kind of nose me out. The idea of a corporation being a person was NOT a Supreme Court decision way back there – it was added as an afterthought to an actual decision. You should not be basing your decisions on a mistake.

    • Wolfslicka

      “All men are created equal”except if a man has more money than the other under citizens united.

    • Alohamoses

      To the Supreme Court justices that passed Citizens United I say to you; If i were an enemy of the United States, I would be rejoicing at how you have helped me bring America to its knees. With one ruling you have done more to end democracy and to destroy this country than all past enemies have ever been able to do. Aren’t you proud of yourselves?

    • vernon

      Every person running for office should receive a set amount they are allowed to spend for their election.  The amount should be taken from a single pool of money that all parties contribute to.  This way it is a more fair race that is being judged on the persons merits not how much he can spend and how many times the population hears his ad or his partial lies (which seems to be the case more often than not.

    • Dennis

      Money is overwhelming the voices of the people, the people that our Constitution was written for. Corporations are NOT people, they are artificial entities, who now have the ability to drown out my voice and the voices of ordinary American citizens who don’t have the money to get our representatives attention. Is this the country we want? Of the rich, for the rich, by the rich and to hell with everyone else? Please reverse the corporate contribution decision; it’s not what our Founders had in mind, it’s not what we the people have in mind. Thank you for restoring our great nation.

    • ttrim

      The Citizens United ruling has made me lose faith in our country, a country my husband has fought for and my family has sacrificed for.  Elections are now bought and paid for which makes all of us without big money unimportant, just pawns to be used and then thrown away.  We certainly aren’t important enough to have a say in our government.  We don’t have enough money for that.  Please reverse this decision, restore my faith in my country, my government and in you, the Supreme Court.  Choose the American People, not corporations.    

    • Rpatterson

      I know in my heart that my father, my uncles and all my family that fought in WWII would be rolling in their graves at this decision.  When corporations become people we are all doomed.  Next thing you know it will be “vote for Walmart for President”.

    • Simon Lucas

      To the Supreme Court, start shooting for democracy not at it. Reverse Citizens United ruling

    • Raymond

      Because of all this money in our politics we the average people no longer have say in how we think our government or country should be governed, we have no lobbyist to represent us like the rich and and powerful do. They are the ones that influence these corrupt politicians and no one listens to us the average citizens anymore. Look at what they did to us four years ago, they single ruined our economy and who suffers us. We can not continue to have people influencing who our President will be and the decisions that will be made and we have no idea who they are. For all I know they could be an outside government who don’t have our best interest in hand and we would not know.

    • Andrea Guernsey

      I would like to see this country to be a true democracy again.  Unfortunately, it seems to be ruled by the corporation and a few very wealthy people.  Our votes don’t seem to matter any more.  I came to the U.S. from Germany because it used to be a country where everybody who worked hard could get ahead.  But this has changed as it is not in the interest of the corporations to provide jobs with a living wage.
      The Supreme Court should reverse the Citizens United ruling immediately, before this country will have lost everything it ever stood for.

    • Lymesing

      Citizens United guaranteed that politicians would be purchased.  There is no democracy when “of the people, by the people, for the people” means corporations.  But then, I suppose that is what the Roberts court wanted. 

      • Nnnooccc

        If non purchased politicians exist now, United Republic has ensured there will not be a non purchased politician in the future.  Supreme Court justices have also been purchased in the past as history demonstrates.

        Get the money out and set term limits – including Supreme Court appointments!

    • seagazer101

      The Supreme Court should be having trouble sleeping over its decision in Citizens’ United.  Instead its members must be dreaming of all the money they’re making off of it.  I’m a retired disabled American who worked all her life and paid taxes (more than my share, compared to them), paid into Social Security and Medicare from the time I was 15 years old, and now I’m hearing that these stalwart Justices would give away my money to corporations to fatten the wallets of their favorite politicians.  “We the People”, my wrinkled old buttocks!

      • Pamie

         I am with you there, Lady!  Sounds exactly like me.  And why is SS an “entitlement” program when we payed into it for over 40 year?   Congressional pensions are locked in after one term….that smacks entitlement to me.

        • Nnnooccc

          Congressional pensions do equal ‘entitlements’ in fact and in spirit. Read the original SS Act.  It states that the SS Trust cannot be used for any purpose other than SS.  Are you aware that for decades the government has siphoned off over FOUR TRILLION dollars of the SS Trust into the General Fund for to use as it chooses?  The legislature thought that there was such an accumulation of money in the Trust that it was the Golden Goose.  Additionally, FOUR TRILLION  of our national debt is the debt owed to the SS Trust.  Between us we have paid into SS for nearly 100 years!
          I diverge from Citizen’s United.  The academic prowess and legal expertise of a Supreme Court Justice seems to preclude experience and an understanding of reality.  Get Money Out Of Politics and Limit Terms of all elected  and appointed officials – including Supreme Court Justices.  Lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court has not protected it from corrupting influences.  The Constitution states that when a government no longer serves the best interest of the people it requires that it be “altered or abolished”.  Food for thought.

      • Nnnooccc

        I  confident that the Supreme Court members are sleeping well in the arms of their lifetime appointments.  It is the American citizens who are not sleeping facing the death of their nation.  Supreme Court justices have, and can be, impeached – one possible solution.

    • Roger Thomas

      Corporations are legal constructs not people.You have granted them un warranted status far beyond reason or what their originators intended. Think about it and you will see this selfevident truth!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=586967583 Angela M. Mogin

      While I support free speech even for corporations and am willing to accept that in some cases money may be akin to speech; it does not follow that secret donations by unknown persons or corporations should be allowed to influence elections.  If a corporation wants to promote or oppose a candidate, it should be willing to sign its’ name to the ad not hide behind some innocuous sounding “Americans for Progress” label.

    • Beth Hoover

      Our political process should not and cannot be a privilege only for those with wealth.  Unfortunately, today it is impossible for the average man or woman to run for public office in this country without having the backing from and catering to those with great wealth.  This situation threatens to derail our democracy.  Let’s put our government back in the control of all of the people, not just the people with money.  Please don’t allow our votes to be bought by faceless PACs and corporations.   

    • Paul Sakol

      Citizens’ United among other things is destroying our democracy.  It is imperative that we get money out of politics!!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1523348362 Renee Reinhardt

      I served this country to protect the people, who have and own businesses, but the business is not a person. It has no breath and blood; it has no rights in priority. It has no place in deciding to influence the government or judicial branches, but it does. It has bought the representation away from the people it was designed to protect. Now, it is time to end the mistake. No media should interfere with how a campaign is presented by biased reporting or air time. No business should be able to make any form of contribution to a political or judicial campaign. No foreign interest can influence elections by investing in companies and using that status to manipulate the political or judicial process. No religious institutes can vie for recognition as an entity and claim they require freedoms meant for individuals only. The corporations are not being sent to jail for criminal acts that put this country in dire debt, but they can come up with all kinds of money and want to vote like a person. Even religions don’t want to pay taxes, but can spend tons of money to buy a Senator or Presidential Candidate. Really? Get them out of our individual human rights and end this monopoly monstrosity.

    • Robert

      Officers, stockholders, employees – all are individuals, and as such have a right to speak their minds, including contributing money to political organizations (free speech), but incorporated entities and unions that employ and/or represent these INDIVIDUALS are NOT people, and thus should not have the same free speech rights.

    • Maureen Rhatigan

      I hang my head in shame at the US Supreme Court, once a reverred institution.  I haven’t forgotten how Roberts and some of his crony justices reacted at a deserved comment Pres. Obama made during a speech in the US Congress.  I still look for people’s opinion as to whether our justices accept lobby money and cannot find any who state they do not believe you do.  You declared corporations are people.  I have yet to see a corporation fit into a voting booth.

    • Claudia Lawson

      God created man & woman, not corporations.  You may as well take “In God We Trust” off our currency because our Supreme Court surely puts all its faith in corporations.  Why else would you give corporations and the rich the power to drown out the voices of every man & woman in our country?  The Citizens United ruling is tearing asunder that which our Constitution espouses, “A government for and of the people.”  Your decision has already created distrust and added to the civil unrest & division among us.  Reverse your decision before our Democratic Republic ceases to exist.

    • Erin Evans

      This mistake threatens our core.  One can foresee a country run by anyone or any group with enough money to bend public opinion.  This is a serious threat in a world so easily swayed by the amoral marketing industry.  

    • Robert Rowley

      I can not believe that Our Supreme Court could even think of allowing Citizens United ruling be approved.  This country is no longer for the people, it is for the bought and paid for, politicians.  That is so sad that these people are being allowed to take over this country with no regards for what is good for the country, just taking bribes to line there own pockets. The politicians that are republican or democrate can not work together, I always thought we are AMERCIANS FIRST. I think the Supreme Court members need to think about that and reverse this Citzens United ruling immediately. 

      • Nnnooccc

        Believe it.  The deed is done and we citizens are continuing to ALLOW the Supreme Court, et al to continue to destroy this nation.  At this moment in time, we citizens can clean up their mess and prevent their next one.

    • J. Shores

      The Citizens United ruling is not free speech for the many, but expensive speech by the few very rich and powerful. This decision    paves the way toward oligarchy. It must be overturned.

    • C. Clements

      I was stunned that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United in the first place.   It no longer feels as if I’m going to
      vote in the upcoming election; it feels more like I’m going to be a spectator at an auction with the bidder who has the most
      money claiming the prize of the White House.

      • Nnnooccc

        Voting is good for your circulation.  In Oregon, we vote all elections and measures with mail in ballots.  Has worked well for many years.  Doesn’t increase your circulation, but does get your vote counted.  ”They” are counting on us to become depressed and apathetic.  A no vote equals no opposition to the destruction of America by the corruptors of our nation.

    • Jluphl

      Please get the money out of politics.  It is anti-democractic to buy politicians and elections.

    • Salidaho

      You complained about judicial activism…now you accept this ?
      Read Jeffrey Toobin’s recent NewYorker article about the Citizens United decision.

    • A. Logan

      .

      The Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United has put our democracy up for sale to the highest bidder…….clearly not the intention of the founders that they would have us believe they so respect.  Quite literally, he–or it as the case may be–with the most dollars can buy the greatest influence on the outcome of elections.  Those elected as a consequence of this new ruling have little or no allegiance to “all of the people.”  The harm that is being done to our democracy is tragic and will often be irrevocable.  It is astonishing that a majority of our current Supreme Court has decided that they have greater wisdom than all justices before them. Apparently that misperception allowed them to elevate corporations and unions by granting political speech rights equal to that of individuals under the Frist Amendment. They found no compelling government interest for prohibiting this!  Look again!  This will pre-determine the very outcome of elections.  Remember the days of yesteryear when the law of the land was “one person, one vote”?  Please do not stand idly by and watch the destruction of our democracy.  Reverse your Citizens United ruling!

    • Tom Lellis

      Jefferson’s alleged quote:

      “The defeat of democracy and the fall of the revolution will occur when the government falls into the hands of the lending institutions and monied corporations”.

      The Constitution says: “All men are created equal. Not all men, and corporations, are created equal. 
      Reconsider NOW.

    • Pamie

      Democracy has been hijacked and subverted. Campaign Reform NOW!   We need Citizens United challenged and reversed.

      This is the only way we are going to get back to the business of doing what is best for the majority of the country.  As long as elected officials are only concerned with keeping their seats and stuffing their pockets, the rest of us don’t have a chance.

    • Zorrojizel

       I like the slogan:  I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one.

    • Lowell Kulp

      This is not the land of the koch bros. and foster freeze!  This is the land of the little people.  When the few have control of the Many, democracy is gone.

    • Dohn_1

      Citizens, not money from corporations, should be the only way our president and congress are voted into political office….period!!  

    • Davewc39

      Who in the hell or what crooked mind said that corporation is free speech? Whoever said in their backward mind should be fired or should not be elected.  If the supreme court can’t hear this or understand they too should be fired or we will have the current President and when he gets relected he will fired all them.  Supreme Court get with the program you know better than that and people are not stupid.  Supreme Court know that corporation does not have feet or a mouth that talks and doesnt know anything about the Constitution, but only money.  Look, Supreme Court get your head of the mud and get above water and open your eyes.  Thank you!!!

      • Nnnooccc

        We cannot fire the Supreme justices as they are appointed for their lifetime.  However, they can be impeached and removed from their positions on the Supreme Court.  I am for whatever it takes to shock them into reality.  I suspect as 9 of the most highly esteemed individuals in America, the real world has not been their natural habitat.

    • Margie

      Who would have thought the separation of powers thing could fail us?  I see freedom of speech as a right granted to individuals to express their views. Where is the line between money as “free speech” and money as bribery? Do the Supreme Court justices
      who voted for Citizen’s United think members of Congress and the Supreme Court and the President should be “above” being bribed? Have they done a reality check on that? People can be bought all too easily, and when our individual votes become meaningless, democracy no longer exists. I think the only hope for our democracy is to get money out of politics.

    • Frank J. Thomeczek

      An important part of a representative government is to have an equal voice in the system that is supposed to represent all of us.  The Citizens United ruling ends any possibility of that, and needs to be reversed.    

    • Pam

      Corporations are not people and money is not speech.

    • Lois Roberts

      How sad to watch as our democracy is destroyed and all in the name of democracy!  Our vote now means nothing since we can not know what special interests contribute all this money and to whom.  Our representatives cannot represent us because they are bound by the money or extremely wealthy men and their interests.  If they don’t accept the money, then those interests will work to defeat them at the polls.  Perhaps all this displays how weak our representatives are and how similarly weak the public are, but isn’t that part of your job – to protect us, albeit from ourselves?  Please rethink Citizens United.   It rmaileally destroys what you felt it was designed to protect.  Everyone makes mistakes.

    • Edward P.

      As the owner of a small corporation, I can tell you that I do not believe corporations should have the ability to spend funds on elections without restriction.

    • Pam

      The ‘Citizens United’ decision ends my ability to be represented in government.  This is no longer government by the people, for the people, and of the people. This is no longer a slippery slope–we have landed at the bottom of the mud hole and are falling down the cliff.

    • Joyce Warrington

      I am a moderate Democrat who has taken an active role in politics,I feel it is deplorable that the Supreme Court ever considered this law let alone passing it. What happened to the government representing the citzens of the USA??

    • Annette Cryder

      Dear Justices of the Supreme Court: The court is no longer supreme, just predictably extreme.  Citizens United is an remarkably un-Democratic ruling, destroying our “one person one vote” system by granting wealthy citizens the ability to anonymously purchase elections. The court’s reputation is forever tarnished by two election-tampering decisions; Bush v. Gore and Citizens United.

    • Harry Newell

      I just don’t understand — I guess I am incapable of the kind of tortured logic that could conclude that campaign financing as enabled by “Citizens United” would not lead to corruption.  Nor do I experience the level of cognitive dissonance to deny that corruption on a very large scale is the result.  Clearly some very wealthy Americans believe that they can now buy elections, and the rest of us feel that our franchise is being stolen.  What a disastrous and bizarre decision.  I can only pray that you will reverse it.

    • Chef-et

      I FEAR FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. WE ARE NO LONGER THE LAND OF THE FREE. FREEDOM NO LONGER RINGS ON OUR SHORES AND ACROSS OUR LANDS, FOR THIS IS NO LONGER “OUR” LANDS. IT BELONGS TO ONLY A HANDFUL OF THE SUPER RICH BANKSTERS. WE ARE ONLY THE SERVANTS WHO TOIL AND LABOR FOR WHAT “THEY” WISH TO GRANT US IN ORDER TO KEEP THEM IN POWER AND US IN SLAVERY. I WISH EVERYONE WOULD OPEN THERE EYES AND SEE WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING.

    • Okrepki

      Corporations are legal entities that are created to make profits and create value for shareholders; these entities are not people. Since these entities do not vote, what is the justification for corporations to have the right to influence voting results? This part of the Citizens United case seems to be a “no brainer” to me. The issue of unlimited spending by wealthy individuals and PAC’s is different but equally at odds with the foundation of the American democratic experiment. Money can buy special treatment in almost all facets of life in America. It must not be allowed to decide our election outcomes. I’ve read that the candidate with more money wins 94 per cent of the time. It is absolutely vital to the future of America that all Americans are equal, not only in the voting booth, but also throughout the campaign process. The Citizens United decision tears at the very foundation of the American democratic experiment; it must not stand.

    • Upper Peninsula Farmer

      Abraham Lincoln stated in the Gettysburg Address that this is to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people, [and] shall not perish from the earth.  The ruling in Citizens United by the Court seems to have become the instrument leading to the demise of the people’s government.  And let’s not forget the Court’s ruling on McCain-Feingold, that money is free speech.  We have seen since that ruling that the more money you have, the more ”free speech” you are entitled to.   

    • Theresa Pugh

      “Follow the money” applies to politics as well as other endeavors. It is corrupt and is devasting this country’s greatness as surely as a category “5″ storm. I am no lnoger represented.

    • Jamie Kemmerer

      The decision to allow unlimited “speech” in the form of campaign spending by corporate “people” is the greatest harm anyone could do to democracy. It is the opposite of the founders intent to create a government reliant upon the “people alone” and instead disenfranchises the people in favor of money. We’ve only begun to see the terrible consequences of this decision, but like so many other bad decisions, the impact is sure to manifest in ways we can’t even imagine. I hope as a nation we can respond in time.

    • Tfrost88

      What makes you Supreme Court justices think you can sell away our democracy? The audacity of fools! We very well know who you really represent and we will be getting rid of you come November!!   TFrost

      • Patls

        Unfortunately, we cannot get rid of the S COTUS in November.  What a shame for democracy.

    • Mohana Dasabey

      You all on the Supreme Court seemed like you were eager to get this ruling done in time for the 2010 elections, almost as though you were acting in league with Americans for Prosperity and the corporate grassroots tea party movement.

    • Preston Law

      I am completely shocked that this ruling even passed, as this ruling can be construed as a restraint on democratic speech.  Democratic speech exists when every individual has a more or less equal opportunity to air his/her views; when you allowed corporations to effectively spend unlimited amounts on political speech, since corporations have more money than all but the wealthiest individuals, corporations can therefore speak more that all but said individuals and dominate the political arena, a result that is anathema to democratic speech.   Supreme Court of America, redact your decision on Citizens United, remove the loopholes on corporate spending, stop the corruption, and give the 99% their government back!

    • R. E. Traul

      Granted, the “CU v. FEC” decision, though clearly reverse engineered to achieve a politically pre-determined outcome, was no great stretch of existing law.  Resolving this inequity requires that we dig deeper.  Sure, corps can contract, sue & be sued, but corporate personhood has never been an “all or nothing” proposition.  You took the wrong track in Santa Clara Co. v. So. Pacific RR (1886), using amendments clearly aimed at eradicating slavery to radically expand corporate power, and you fell off the train completely with Buckley v. Valeo.  Spoken and written words are “speech;” money just buys them.  As an atty, I am ashamed that you have collectively forgotten that YOUR DUTY TO US IS OBJECTIVITY, NOT ADVOCACY.  Right this wrong, get back on the bandwagon, or we will go over your heads.  And yes, John, Tony I, Tony II, Clarence & Sam, there is still a little space up there, between your lips and God’s ear.  It is occupied by us, the people . . . you do know what a “person” is, don’t you?

    • James W. Vaughn

      Being The Court Ruled That Money Was Voice!! – - The Majority Of Us Don’t Have Enough To Whisper.
      For The People And By The People????? 

    • Len Ihnen

      Money in politics tends to corrupt and unlimited money corrupts absolutely.

    • Robin kollar

      The Citizens United ruling undermines our democracy, I agree with Senator McCain.

    • Elster760

      The reprobate money mongers MUST be put on a shorter leash!

    • Clare Angle

      Now that we are experiencing the Citizens United ruling in this current election (watching big money select our politicians) it’s undermining effect on our democracy was not the intended.  Repealing this ruling is of the utmost importance to our precious democracy.  

    • Billy

      Dear “Justices”, Either you believe in democracy or you don’t. I’d like you to do the right thing, but I don’t have much confidence in any of you…….

    • Chrisbivey

      Please overturn this Citizens United ruling, This is not only a big error, it’s bribery $$$ at its best and must end now!!! Otherwise the sleeping Giant “the masses of people oblivious to this swindeling game” will someday awaken with revolt like no other… Think about it, yes, one can be fooled some,….. but not all the time. For our children’s sake, let’s do the right and thing and get this changed now….

    • Charlie

      What would Thomas Jefferson have thought about the Court’s ruling concerning Citizens United?  I’m sure he would have found little wisdom in it (just check his writings).  Money is in the process of destroying our democracy.  Please reflect this Memorial Day weekend on all the blood that has been shed by past and present generations in defense of our democracy and in their memory reconsider your previous decision that threatens all that is right with our country.

      • Sagebrush

        Citizens United insures that what Jefferson warned about in 1802 is exactly what happens and keeps happening today. It needs reversed.  

         

      • Sagebrush

        Thomas  Jefferson said in 1802:

        ‘I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered..’

    • Edlazore203

      Why in the world would any of you want a few billionaires control the politics of our country?  That is exactly what you people did.  Shame on all of you!

    • Con Thueson

      Dear Justices — Money is not speech.  Speech is writing a letter to the editor or an op-ed.  Speech is standing up in a town hall meeting, speech is standing on a soap box in the public square.  Money is not speech.  Money is influence in Washington and those who have more of it now get more influence.  This is not fair, this is not democracy, this is not right and this is not what the framers of the constitution intended.  The Citizens United ruling is a huge mistake and must be quickly overturned.  We are already reaping the bitter fruit of this unwise decision in our current political process.

    • Allichtenfels

      Where is equal justice under the law when money is involved?  Those with the greater amount of money almost always win.  The Supreme Court with the Citizens United ruling created an absolutely unfair advantage for the rich and corporations.  This must be changed!!!!

    • Charlie

      Your Honors,
      Memorial Day weekend is an appropriate time to look back and think about the individuals who have fought and died for our country. There is not a single corporation that fought and died, not one. Corporations are not citizens, they are corporations, period. Thank you all for your service.

    • Courtneycampbell

      We the People have lost our voice due to Citizens United.  Now, money votes.  Since the corporations have the money, they dictate legislation!  Nothing can change the fact that we will all be living under their best interests until this ridiculous decision is overturned.  

    • Ken Nagakui

      “Citizens United”? What a completely and decisively opposite naming for manipulation! It’s “Less Than 1% Citizens United”. For rest of us it’s “Citizens Divided”, “Citizens Dismembered” to be pieces of meat to feed the power hungry, instead of ensuring one vote power for each. MONEY IS NOT SPEECH, OK? Amazing how blinded (morally corrupt) the current 5 members of the Supreme Court are! But real question is: do we have to wait until history clearly tells? I don’t think so.

    • Judith Davenport

      Dear Unjustice’s of the Supreme Court,
      Your Citizens United decision to give corporations the right to vote because they are a person is totally absurd. I believe it has been proven that each human, each person who is on this earth, has a signature DNA strand. Corporations do not have DNA. The only thing corporations have is the craving for more and more greed. It would seem that you, Unjustices, share that same corporate philosophy, greed. I belive the American people should demand an investigation to determine how much money each of you received to come to your Citizens United decision. This is wrong. If you voted for Citizens United you are not fit morally to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

    • Eugene McLean

      My Grandfather, Father, Myself, and now My Son, DID NOT shed our flesh and blood in this country’s wars just to have our government up for sale to the highest bidder!

    • Johnkovich

      I served my country from 1962 until 1969; no corporate entity nor any very rich individuals stood beside me representing America at the point of the spear.  Your ruling in the Citizens United case has provided unbelieveable power to corporations and to the ultra-rich.  Please look at what has happened and continues to happen in American politics since your ruling and revisit this issue.  Power in America should belong to all the people, not to a small portion of the people who control most of the money.

    • Rwkleinman

      Your action of approving Citizens United has given the wealthy and large corporations a much greater chance in gaining complete control of our government by buying politician’s favors.  Remember “We the People”?  Get rid of Citizens United!

    • Ronald Mercer

      Money in politics must be regulated by congress. If congress can print money, it should be able to regulate money in political campaigns as seen fit.  Citizen’s united interferes with congressional regulation of campaign contributions and is a threat to the foundation of our democracy.  

    • Pivo24

      The devastation & sheer arrogance being caused by these corporations/politicians will forever destroy the fiber & character of the United States of America; with no hope for economic recovery or rebuilding of this once great nation; now is the time for the American Public to not be so complacent!!!  Our Social Security payments, have been tucked away in an interest bearing accounts for decades until the corporations/politicians decided to raid our accounts & give OUR money to a bunch of zero ambition politicians in return for votes, thus bankrupting the system & turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme.  This is not what our fore-fathers invisioned for the future.  We have been/are being raped of our freedoms & democracy!!!  You need to educate yourselves on what a democracy truely is/means!!!  The entire system is corrupt to the core & changes must to made to save us all.  Have a great Memorial Day & think about how your actions are negatively affecting the moral fiber, of the citizens, of the United States of America!!!

    • Oldbillmillsaps

      I would like to live in an America where “We the People” give and take away office by voting, not an America where…’Money Giveth Office, and Money Taketh Office Away’! My $5.00 to $10.00 is just wasted when so called “Super Pacs”  can give Unlimited funds to their choice for any office.. Office is being purchased and our system corupted beyond imagining by Money…Get money out of politics… I give my big fat NO to Citizen’s United!!!

    • Nancy C.

      When history tells the story of the once great democracy known as the United States of America, its’ decline and fall will be noted as beginning with the infamous Bush v Gore decision of 2000, which effectively, for the first time, substituted an appointed President instead of the constitutionally mandated one elected by the people. It culminated with the equally flawed decision in the  Citizens United case, which effectively gave control of the country to the highest bidder, by conferring person hood upon corporations — a feat even God did not see fit to do. There are only 201 people in this country who truly believe corporations are people — the 196 who contribute 99% of the funding currently influencing elections at every level of government and the 5 justices in the majority on the recent decision. As a 72 year old who has lived through World War II and all the incredible history, good and bad that has followed, and who has voted in every national, state and local election since earning that privilege at 18, I implore you to re-examine your decision and set it right so that the generations to follow can proudly enjoy their duty as involved citizens to help determine the destiny of their country as the Founding Fathers intended. This can only happen on a level playing field without the corruption posed by the monetary influence of a select few interests.Smart justices can err, wise justices recognize their errors, great justices correct them!

    • EDS56

      Our government is no longer “by the people, for the people, and of  the people.” Corporations are not people and money is not speech. The power differential that money provides between corporations and real people is enormous. We are seeing already the negative, destructive effect the super-pacs are having on this year’s elections. The Citizens United ruling must be reconsidered. It is distorting the democratic process into a tool that benefits the powerful few.

    • Karen Gray

      Private interests and money has been increasingly dominant in our political system. It is time to stop these groups that are supporting misinformation to convince our elected officials and people to vote for things that are not in the best intersts of the people in exchange for money, in the one case, and in the other, voting for things they don’t fully understand.

    • Fran Holbrook

      This is not the USA my dad fought for in WW2 and not the USA my dad taught me about. We can do better again. The unlimited amount of money being spent on ugliness and lies and racism could certainly be going to better uses. Corporations are not people and money is not speech.

    • Donald Peterson

      I remember from my Civics Classes that the supreme court was a non political neutral body who decided law. Some where 4 of you forgot that and started ruling from the right point of view. When you decided that the Citizens United ruling was a good thing to pass you spat in the face of what we were taught. You were told what would happen, that elections would be bought, and it’s obvious now that my vote no longer counts. The election is being bought by the right with your help. When President Obama in his State of The Union Address said this would happen Justice Alito sat there and shook his head and mouthed the words ” no it will not.” The proof is in the pudding so to speak. I therefore believe that Justice Alito and at the least Chief Justice Roberts, to maintain the integrate of the Supreme Court, resign. If either of them have any integrate they will do so.

    • Photopop

      get my job back from ” CHINA ” Thats all i care about right NOW !!!!!!

    • Loubaker22

      If corporations are people; why hasn’t a corporation been convicted for environmental, financial and social crimes and placed on death row in Texas?
       

    • Frank

      This is not the country I fought for in WW11, nor the one I fought for in Vietnam . We all  know that unlimited amounts of money almost always bring corruption to the system. Corporations are not people , never has been never will be. There are many instances where evidence of actual corruption, including vote buying by Corporations. The Citizens United case must be reconsidered as it is wrong, wrong, just plain wrong.

    • Rosealadin

      Overturn this pernicious ruling,which has sullied the reputation of the Supreme Court and turned our election process into a cheap farce directed by the Koch brothers and their ilk.

    • WWII Vet

      Another stake of corruption plunged in the heart of democracy! Why should I believe my vote has any meaning when special interest money has so much influence over those seeking my vote. 

    • Joe

      When money becomes the influence, the people are no longer represented and the few rule the many. Government is no longer by the people for the people. The rich are always the few who become involved in politicts. They learn to become lawyers and liars to get where they are. A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. — George Bernard Shaw

    • Peter Leonard

      Corporations are not people!  Real people should control the government.

    • chicky2u22

      I am no longer viewing the country that I was so proud of.  As more time goes on, we become further down the line from other countries that are way ahead of us on multitudinous levels.  Citizens United is putting a stake in the heart of our Democracy.  Is this the final blow for us?  It certainly will be, I think.

    • Yogiobear

      The top one percent of us got rich off the sweat of our nuts then claim they have a right to keep the fruits of our labor then they use the riches they made from our labor to lobby congress for the privilege of keeping their foot on our throats. Then Roberts gifts them with the ability to use the money they made from our labor to out spend our free speech and get their republicans voted into office.

    • Wmiller12

      Though we do believe in free enterprise and live in a capitalist society, it is because of working people, consumers, giving Corporations their profits.
      Now they want to use those trillions of dollars of profits to overrule the voices of the millions of hardworking loyal americans who have been the catalysts behind all that american corporations profit from……the sweat of the brows of their employees.

      Are we to face a future in America where only America’s wealthy captains of industry have all the power to determine what laws we should abide by just because they made some politicans wealthy through secret means…..and those politicians legislate according to the dictates of their wealthy corporate donors?

      We are currently in the throes of an economic downturn brought on by corporations outsourcing middleclass structure jobs to other nations because of their want to gain higher profits through the desperation of global workers willing to accept lower wages, and at the same time, these corporations are securing the fact that american wages are stagnant and ever decreasing.  Within this reality, how can we continue to be consumers and support our struggling economy? 

      Though there is nothing criminal about corporations using whatever means at their discretion in pursuit of higher profits, yet, it does bring in questions of having a concern for the financial stability of all hardworking americans……. and nowadays, there seems to be no loyalty from our own wealthy job creators having no care for how their ownhardworking american fellows should survive. 

      Corporate America is ignoring how the american middleclass, once the most powerful economic force on this earth, is being reduced to the ranks of the working poor.
      There was once a time when americans had the idealist notion that ‘we are all in this together’, and we stood shoulder to shoulder to strengthen the opportunities for all americans to gain a portion of what was once the ‘American Dream’.

      I stand with the opposers going against the Supreme Court’s ruling that gives corporations personhood.  It should be one voice, one vote.  What we have with Citizens United is a collective pluralist voice being counted as one.   

    • Jo Hodge

      Our government should not be able to be bought.  It should not be for sale.  If this continues as it is with the powerful and wealthy owning the government, it will be the the distruction of our country.  Please end this policy immediately.

    • Evets-esuork

      if money equals speech, can I go down to the IRS office and talk for a while and get them to leave my paycheck alone?

      • Nnnooccc

        I asked the same question.

    • Senor

      Citizens United is the worst Supreme Court decision in the history of
      the United States. It has, in effect, denied 99% of the American people
      representation in Congress by allowing people and corporations with
      money to unfairly influence our elected officials. We  essentially have
      taxation without representation, the very principle that sparked the
      American Revolution.

    • Citizen

      Citizens United will eventually destroy our democracy.  If money can so influence elections, why bother voting at all.  I can see what has been happening in Wisconsin when in the recall of Gov. Walker millions have been raised, mostly out of state to keep him in office to do the bidding of ALEC and the Koch brothers. 

    • free-speech

      The founders very much wanted the ability of all Americans to be heard without censorship.  They did not anticipate the power of mass media and TV to influence voters with massive airtime – effectively overwhelming the voice of the average guy via “carpet bombing” with very short “attack ads” in the mass media funded by corporations and very wealthy individuals. We’ve gone too far!

      At least we should have some way of reporting who is paying for what – when ads come from PACs, the folks who pay for it should be listed. The founders of this country signed their true names to their opinions. We have a right to free speech, but I think the right to anonymous free speech is somewhat dubious. 

    • xena13

      Our Democratic process is disappearing before our eyes.  One of the few things remaining in our great country that is NOT bought and paid for by corporations and special interest groups, as our Congress is now, are elections.  Our last chance for our voices to be heard and mean something is when we have the human and civil right to vote for our elected officials.  Our most precious form of free speech.  With the Citizens United decision in the Supreme Court we can now teach our children that voting really doesn’t matter.  We have the best democracy domestic and foreign money can buy.  Wow, how far we’ve fallen.  Unless the Citizens United decision is overturned we can refer to our country as a Corporatocracy instead of a Democracy.    

    • http://partneringwitheagles.wordpress.com/ 8blackhawks

      I am a conservative; however nobody is right all of the time. I detest the idea of being subservient to a “world court”; (Get out of the U.N.) our Constitution and rule of law is not to be abrogated. On this particular issue, regardless of party affiliation, it needs to be given the boot. bIt is wrong in every respect.

    • http://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik Joseph Zernik

      The Supreme Court – supreme corruption!

    • Kel

      Will America go by the way of the Roman Empire? We need your help. You’re human as we are, you have families as do we, we know of our medival history and our violent present.  It all starts with power, greed and division and it ends with the Divided States of America.  America is the good, not perfect but good and moving in the right direction. Our forefathers who signed our constitution new they could be hanged, but they did what was right for the future of of country and the future of man kind. You are the children of your anestors love, devotion and hard work.  You are the children of what is holy and “good”, continue “the” path, honor them. When the time comes, you can take your seat a the table with your ancestors with pride. You’ve done well, legacy fulfilled.

    • Febaer

      I think the  wealthy in this country have enough people in Congress looking out for them, it’s time that the middle class
      person has some influence in the halls of Congress.  I never thought I would believe that our gov’t could be bought, well
      I guess I was wrong and that really upsets me to admit that to myself.  I wish I didn’t feel that way for the sake of my
      two daughters.

    • Lee Jamerson

      The Supreme Court of the United States of America has been entrusted with one of the most important responsibilities in the republic; the interpretation of the constitution and its powers. Justices, please DO NOT fail the citizens of this country by ignoring the your constitutional responsibility. Ensure that the voices of all Americans (not just the rich, lobbies and corporations) are clearly heard. Revisit the “Citizens United” decision and get the big money out of our electoral processes. – L. Jamerson / Albuquerque, NM

    • Anne75243

      One man (or woman), one vote. Please listen to us!

    • Geoandy47

      R U kidding me; Citizens United, should read 2% united 98% divided & we know where the hearts & minds of our Supreme Court Justices reside. Remember the Preamble to our constitution (which you all swore to uphold) says Justice For All – not the 2% controlling our lives. Why does the 2% not want us to Thrive as a Nation, a Government with Healthy Citizens? They would lose control over the majority with that, loss of fortune derived by greed and us the 98% having our heads in the sand. It is time to stand up & be counted, time for a Human Revolution, we need to get the Power of The People Back that means US (THE MAJORITY) Let’s Do This.
      Thank You

    • Rosanna Hunt-Harkin

      Was our government always corrupt?  Did big business always run this Country?  I’m 68 yrs. old and it surely seems that lobbyists for big business always dictated through their “donations” to our corruption.  Long time corruption never leads to prosperity.  It only leads to a very small wealthy minority, crime rises and our standard of living and retirement, falls. There was a time when politicians were “for the people”.  This greed and seperatism will be our downfall.  You have the power to overturn this.  You must ! 

      • Nnnooccc

        I agree.  And, many of us have enough years to remember a long past.  It hasn’t been pretty.

    • Bob Miller

      America used to be the shining city on the hill because of our freedom, democracy, and justice. Now with Citizens United allowing unlimited secret money from billionaires and multi national corporations to influence our campaigns, our light has been dimmed. We are now the garbage dump on the hill. End this corruption.

    • Wally

      How can it be called “free speech” when the millionaires and billionaires, with and without PACs, seem to be able to get heard more than anyone else.

    • Remmills

      You are no longer the Supreme Court, you are now the Extreme Court. Since passing Citizens United, which opened the door to unlimited hidden corruption,destroying the rights of hard working loyal Americans, you no longer deserve the respect of the people. A court cannot survive in its current form without public confidence. If you favor the rich at the cost of the people, you will be overturned.

    • Trish Vazquez

      With this passing of Citizens United the Supreme Court has make a mockery of this Republic! Shame on them! – Dr. Vazquez

    • Swift1374A

      People should be the only ones with voices, not money!

    • Dn Green

      Dred Scott……… Citizens United.     Two cases of the Supreme Court having a complete lack of common sense

    • Dan Baker

      When the 1st amendment was written,
      corporations weren’t considered people nor did we have modern mass media.
      Citizens United allows a rich minority and foreign interests to unfairly
      influence our elections.

      This corrupts our government so that it no longer serves the
      people it taxes. This is taxation without representation! This is the kind of
      mistake that kills a nation, either by weakening it to falling apart and being
      taken by another power, or by sparking a revolution and civil war. This must be
      fixed!! We have so much potential, and if we are to weather such challenges as an
      enormous population propped up by dwindling fossil fuels, we can’t have
      corruption at the core of our elections!

    • R. E. Traul

      Dear Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States:

      A couple simple questions, may they please the Court:

      Does our Constitution create an oligarchy?  Is that what the Framers intended?  If you believe so, have the courage to say so – and then step down, as you are not fit for duty.  If not, please explain why the oligarchs are through the gates and over the walls of America.  Were you not assigned the task of standing guard?  The minority needs more protection than the majority, and the individual needs more protection than the collective.  The Framers understood these truths, and the Constitution embodies them.  The caselaw cited in and leading up to “Citizens United” may have lowered the walls, but this Court opened the floodgates.  Right your wrong or be left behind.  Impartiality, not advocacy, is your duty.  If you cannot fulfill it, resign.  I hear the pension and health plan are fantastic!  And besides, rumor has it Goldman Sachs is hiring . . .

    • Judith Petersen

      Politicians should be elected, not bought.  The Supreme Court voted on the wrong side of this issue and betrayed our country.  Talk about activist judges!

    • Nicholas Greyn

      Citizens United seems like an inaccurate name to me.  It seems to be uniting big corporations’ money and elections.  It completely ignores the citizens of America.

    • Jlabusohr

      It’s disgaceful that the United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution in such a way as to support the notion that corporations are people. The Citizen’s United decision leads to a plutocracy, and undermines the democratic process, and isn’t that obvious ?

    • Ube1937

      Corporations are organizations that can own property and make contracts; however the property and contracts
      do not belong to the individuals who formed the Corporations. If Corporations have millions to give to super
      pacs, why aren’t they paying more in taxes to help this country; and why are they receiving tax dollar subsidies?

      The Supreme Court of the U.S. does it’s job based on established legal rules that are laid down in the Constttution.
      The SCOTUS does not make the laws; it upholds the laws in the Constitution. Does the Constitution state that
      a Corporation is a person? When the SCOTUS buries the first Corporation in the ground like a dead person gets
      buried, we can then call a Corporation a person.

      A Supreme Court decision has great importance and should be done with decency, morality and honesty. They
      have failed their duty with Citizens United by undermining every voters rights of equality.

      Throw ‘Citizens United’ under the bus, and throw that Corporate person there too!!!

    • richard

      The Supreme five’s “See no evil” approach to money and politics re so-called “Citizens United” is so disingenuous as to be laughable, if it weren’t tragic. Have you gentlemen no shame? No matter how rich you are or you think your children may someday be, they will suffer the consequences of your unjust decision just like all the rest of us — with less nutritious (or even dangerous food), dirtier air and water and ever-dirtier politicians. You gentlemen have simply lost your minds as well as your souls, but perhaps you weren’t human to begin with. I will pray for you and for the political party whose bidding you live to do. Selah!
       

    • Robert Stover

      I fly the STARS and STRIPES. But only to honor my family members who defended it .The BLACK ROBES who voted For so called Citizens  United dishonor the Flag  and my brave family members. Shame on them.

    • Mgroark24

      The result of “Citizens United” is to throw out our Constitution as it was intended by our forefathers.  Our constitution is no longer “of the people”, “for the people”, and “by the people”.  It is now “of the corporation/money”, “for the corporation/money”, and “by the corporation/money”.   We are being deluged with ads by the money people on every channel on our TVs.  These ads are misleading and some are outright lies.  The Supreme Court’s action on “Citizens United” has thrown out our constitution.  I ask the Supreme Court to reverse their action.
       

    • Nnnooccc

      On December 7, 1941, the attack on Pearl Harbor awakened American and we fought for our liberty and freedom with our hearts, souls and blood.  I believe that the Supreme Court Citizen’s United ruling threatening the freedom and liberty of America and it’s citizens is nothing short of another Pearl Harbor.  America has been attacked from within it’s own shores by the Supreme Court.  America is awakening and we will fight for our freedom and liberty once again with our hearts, souls and blood.  We will get the money out of politics and remove any other person(s) or entity from power that threatens our freedom and liberty.  We have done it in our past and we will do it again – Americans are a strong and courageous people.  We are a nation united and we will fight for our Constitution and our country!

    • Jeanette0965

       I guess gig money is in the pockets of  our supreme court sorry to say

    • Marklc27

      The Citizen’s United ruling is a severe threat to our democracy!  The amount of money poured into our elections since the ruling has been obscene.

    • pml

      Corporations do not belong in elections.  Our representatives need to represent the people.  Corporations are not people.  Corporations are focused on profits and the bottom line, usually to the detriment of those around them.  Our government should not be up for sale and votes should not be bought.  This is a disgrace to our country!  For the people, by the people.  That’s where we need to return.

    • thomasiine richardson

      Citizens United, along with the multiple other super-packs are trying to buy, corrupt and auction off our elections to the highest bidder. I am sorry to say, that the Supreme Court allowed this to happen and unless they amend their decision our democracy is
      in terrible trouble. This is an assault on our freedom as Americans and I cannot stand by and let this happen without a fight!   

      • Nnnooccc

        The Supreme Court did not “allow” it.  The court facilitated it.

    • Minniemeatball

      Democracy must include the concept of fairness.  Is it fair to allow a corporate entity to have overwhelming clout in our elections?  Do we want to go back to an aristocracy?

    • Sandra Sanguinetti

      The SC betrayed America and Americans when they declared Corporations and their money are people.  We have seen what has occurred since the SC gave these corporations  permission to spend millions of Dollars buying politicans.    There is no longer a Government by the people and for the people.   Surely this it not what the founding fathers intended.  

    • Jeanine

      Citizens United is merely another euphimistic phrase for LEGAL BRIBERY.  It results in a system where we no longer have elections–we have AUCTIONS.  The fact that the Court displays no concern over the taint of corruption is vile.  Citizens United is another example of a thoroughly corrupted, illegitimate corporate run ‘government.’  There has not been a larger embarrassment for the ‘Court’ since the evil Dred Scott decision.  Put simply–MONEY IS NOT SPEECH, CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE AND THE MYTH OF FREE MARKETS IS NOT DEMOCRACY.  The Supreme Court has outlived its usefulness-they are corrupted and undemocratic. Signed,
      Jeanine Molloff
       

    • htfd

      The inability to distinguish between a business entity and a person along with equating money with speech speaks volumes about this Supreme Court.  None of which are favorable.  The Citizen United decision has tainted every decision that has been render by this body of jurist in the past and decisions to be made in the future.    

    • Brightstarlm

      anybody who thinks that money is speech has an illogical mind–if money is speech, then speech is money–look it up in the dictionary–I guess we can all just start creating new words with new meanings–like the word “murder” could also be called “speech” as well 

    • Charles L. Marsh Sr

      The Supreme Court has followed the congress in bending to the will of those who want to control our country through bribes and propaganda. Money has corrupted the integrity of Congress and Supreme Court and we will continue to be subject to this type of injustice due to the lack of courage and basic common sense from those we depended upon for our ultimate legal decisions. In other our political appointments in the Supreme Court reflect the same corrupt values of the congress that appointed them. 

      Thank you United Republic for giving me a voice to change things for the majority of people in this great nation. 

    • spindoctor

      ‘CORRUPTION’  -  it’s the American system of government.  It is obvious to the entire world that wealthy individuals, and especially wealthy corporations are the real constituents of our elected “representatives.”   (Also unions, but unions’ wealth pales compared to that of corporations).  Institutionalized corruption is at the core of our political system that runs on money far far more than votes or the interests of citizens.  Wealthy interested parties pay for the results that they want, drowning out the interests and “speech” of ordinary people.  It makes no difference whether Exxon gives money directly to a politician, or to his or her PAC.  The candidate knows who is calling the tune in either case, and to whom favors are owed.  It now seems futile to engage in the political system as a citizen.  It no longer matters what citizens want. Our Supreme Court got it exactly wrong.  It’s a travesty.  And the worst part is, now that the corporations are in charge of everything, it will be difficult or impossible for citizens to ever reclaim Democracy.

    • Msnow593

      we have to have truly supreme  leaders to ever make our country fair for all citizens. doesn’t look for working & poor

    • Darkstar48

      The definition of speech is “the expression of or the ability to express thoughts and feelings by articulate sounds.” A corporation is a construct of society; not being human, it does not itself have thoughts or feelings, and therefore cannot engage in the speech of Amendment One of the Constitution. The “speech” of a corporation reflects the thoughts and feelings of the individuals that control it.

      The Citizens United decision has provided a subterfuge which allows the wealthiest individuals to have an outsized ability to give voice, and therefore outsized influence, to their political interests. 

      This Supreme Court decision, by allowing unlimited spending to influence the vote, is destroying the one man, one vote concept of democracy, and changing our country into an oligarchy of the wealthiest. 

    • Lance

      I own a small trucking company. All of the government regulations governing my industry are obviously written with help from big trucking lobbiest. The ideas governing saftey etc. are good. The implementation is exteemly bad due to the wording of the legislation. I am extreemly tired of being governed by big business lobbiest. Everyone knows that special interest money is running our politics. There seems to be little we can do about it. Lance Lindsay

    • Ken_1946

      I am just an insignificant citizen of this great country,however I once had a voice in it’s buisness. Now with citizens united my voice and the voices of all the other insignificant citizens has been drowned out by the big money corporation’s legal bribery of our elected officials. Corporation’s main function in the world is to make money for their stockholders and executives,not the welfare of the country. it is not the corporations fault. That is what they are supposed to do. The fault lies with the supreme court for not protecting the citizens of this country from these predators. Put a stop to legal bribery end citizens united. 

    • Hash820

      I have had it with the out of control results of your Citizens United ruling. We are being subjected to the desires of a few wealthy people in the U.S. and who knows where else. I was taught to respect the Supreme Court and its decisions. But now I sure have my doubts. I am saddened to have to feel this way.

    • Olliegcollins

      With monetary influence on politics, we will never have a true democracy.  Please help our country.

    • J. Morath

      If money = free speech, then I guess the 1% just have more freedom than the rest of us. These are the same folks that like to go around saying that America is an “aspirational” society where anyone can succeed while doing everything they can to make sure the game is rigged in their favor and nobody else can join the club. The entire process is up for sale, and those of us who are supposed to be represented/served by the three branches of government are reduced to spectators in a game between monied interests on both sides of the aisle.

    • Lazarusthe2nd

      Our Grate Founding Father George Washington said, Their should never be the forming of any political parties, As those in such parties will do whats best for their parties rather than whats best for their Nation and it’s People. He hit the nail right on the head as we see this going on all the time.  This includes money going into politics, as to who has the most will most likely become the new.

      • Bliz

         George was great, not grate

    • Patricia Angeli Kern

      Most rep and senators needed to be thrown out of office. I only wish the the rep supreme justices could be thrown out too.
      We put them there and we pay their salaries and health care for them and their families too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      AND WHAT THE HELL DO WE GET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  NOTHING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  WHAT LITTLE WE HAVE THEY WANT TO
      TAKE THAT TOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  AND IF THERE IS A SHORT FALL IN REVENUE, WE PAY FOR THAT TOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      HELL WE PAY FOR EVERYTHING FOR THESE CROOKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THROW THEM OUT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 0Mikebar0

      Hi, Republicans say that the rich are the job creators. You need to remind the people who have been the job creators over the last 200 years. Hewlett/Packard-2 guys in a garage who had to borrow $500 to get started, Marconi a poor Italian invented radio, peanut butter & George Washington Carver, Alexander Graham Bell & the telephone, the Wright Brothers-bicycle shop owners & flight. There are hundreds of thousands more. Sure rich people came in with seed money after the ideas but they never came in with ideas. And the government could have provided the seed money anyways. Just think of what flight & radio have meant to the military. That’s where the internet comes from, and radar, not rich people who already have theirs so don’t even bother trying to create something. Steve Jobs is an exception but there aren’t very many exceptions. Would A. Bell have continued tinkering in his shop if he had already been a millionaire? Would any of them? Can pigs fly? You have the resources, you do the math. Mike Barbano

    • Heathcl

      I have voted in every election since I turned 18-years-old.  I frequently contact my legislators when I feel strongly about a particular issue.  This is the first time in my life that I am starting to feel apathetic and hopeless about our democracy.  I truly feel as though corporate money used for political influence is out of control and is drowning out the voices of the majority of hard-working Americans.  Trusting our legislators to do the right thing and serve the people is nearly impossible when corporations have such an advantage over private citizens.  Please reverse Citizens United and restore my faith in our democracy.

    • Normhowe_2000

      Give me my country back.

    • Richard D Taylor

      One dollar one vote? No thank you.

    • Kendall1947

      In ancient Greek mythology, Hercules had to kill the hydra, a monstrous sea serpent with many heads atop long necks.  Whenever he cut one head off, 2 grew in its place.  Then there was a central head, larger than the rest, that was immortal.  The many abuses of modern corporations are the ordinary heads, and activists fight them one at a time, only to find twice as many problems in the end.  The central head, however, is the Citizens United ruling that corporations are people entitled to the same fundamental rights as citizens.  Hercules buried this “immortal” head under a heavy boulder.  Let us bury Citizens United likewise!

    • Cardoso Diane

      The Supreme Court has a reputation for being extremely cognizant of its rulings as they shape the writing of American History.  I can’t help but think of what will be written regarding the Roberts’ Court and the Citizens United ruling.  They have defaced and devalued the Court’s esteem and reputation for years come.  I have little hope that they will reverse their ruling, but even less that the U S Congress can address this injustice with new and appropriate legislation.  To whom do The People turn now? 

    • Linda quinet

      May the US Supreme Court stop billionaires from buying our politicians and our laws.

    • Randjo

      AFTER THE BUSH GORE RULING WHICH WAS NOTHING BUT POLITICAL AND NOT BASED ON THE LAW. I LOST COMPLETE FAITH
      IN THE COURT,  AS SOMEONE WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY PLEASE STOP THROWING THE AVERAGE CITIZENS UNDER THE BUS 
      DEMOCRACY SHOULD NOT BE FOR SALE TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER.

    • Craig Wilson

      Wasn’t it Ralph Nader who warned us that both parties are so owned by the monied interests that it doesn’t matter who the candidate is or from what party he represents: the winner will inevitably be the lesser of the two evils, because candidates who are unafraid to speak truth to power, who represent real change and oppose this oligarchy won’t get any air time whatsoever by our corporate controlled media.       

    • Suzanne

      Citizen’s United has declared corporate boards and their management deserving of DOUBLE REPRESENTATION under the law, once as individual citizens, and secondly, again, as corporations, which flies in the face of anyone’s idea of fairness! 

    • Jskiel49

      I keep hearing about the one percent, but even that number is not true. It is more like .1 percent, or maybe even less. The bits and bobs of money donated by folks here and there don’t really add up to a hill of beans. Only the very rich people, who are donating the big bucks, really count, and those are the ones who can sway the politicians to either add or kill legislation that can help or hurt the interests of these very wealthy people. What they ask for will always be something that is advantageous to them. Just look at the history. Ignore the air, water, earth, etc. Just give the rich what they want, so they can get richer. We all know there is a way for cars to be run without exhaust that would ruin the environment, but it wouldn’t require oil and gas, just hydrogen, and the exhaust is water. Wow. But… the big oil companies would lose a great deal of revenue and that just can’t happen. The big oil companies will not allow it. Shareholders would lose out. Thus they fight for legislation that will benefit them, but not the environment. Bills pass that will save the air and water a little at a time.  Our Founding Fathers would have a fit if they saw the way our country is operating right now. How sad. Meanwhile we are kill our planet and the rich are getting richer. And still they complain about paying taxes at the level that was normal a few years ago!!! Just how bad do things have to get. How poor does the middle class have to get and how polluted does Earth have to get before more rich people decide take a stand and say “Yes we make a lot and we do need to pay more taxes and maybe we should start taking care of our planet too.” Oh well… I guess I am just asking entirely too much from these selfish, narcissistic, power hungry, money hogs to whom multiple millions of dollars is just not enough. For them it is easier to ruin lives and ruin the planet by taking everything without thought. 

    • Gloria Morotti

      Corporations are NOT the people. 

    • earth2scott

      One person - one vote.  That is democracy.  To allow wealth to influence politics is one dollar - one vote.  That is plutocracy.  And that is a throwback to ages past when power and wealth were synonymous. It is time to move into the 21st century and realize that for mankind to survive, we have to cast aside the old ways that segregate and divide us.  Together we stand – divided we fall.

    • Bob Pomicter Jr

      Maybe this comment may not mean that much to the Supreme Court.

      It seems to me, in the very few days since I signed the petition and joined up for receiving emails that there is a unified belief that the Citizen’s United ruling is an issue wherein  common folk like myself feel that we no longer have a voice in our government, overtaken by money-greed.

      As much as I agree with that principle, I would suggest that, perhaps, one might take a more pro-active stand on this issue.

      It is OK to to suggest that the Supreme Court ruling is wrong… I agree with that wholeheartedly. But, realistically, one can not get orange juice by squeezing a prune.

      So instead.. get involved on a more pro-active way. When you see a PAC commercial on  TV … CALL THAT NETWORK UP… tell them you OBJECT TO THAT PAID COMMERCIAL! sway the media… PLAY THE SAME GAME!

      It is so important for us/USA to use that power as a citizen to let the big boys know that we are on to their games.

      Hey… after all … if money equals power then power equals money… WE HAVE THE POWER!!! Get to it!

      • Mhs

         yes, I agree

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/7P7EUBEPX65VXRL3FTUR4NN3MI RayL

      Are there in fact ANY laws against bribery that have any teeth left?

    • Mhs

      This allows the riches people to buy off senators and so-called reprsentatives to run the country based on what the money people want.

    • JudithL

      The Citizens United decision will undoubtedly go down in history as one of the worst, if not the worst, decision ever made by the Supreme Court. As well, it shows the Court’s — those in the majority — disregard for the people whose interests it is supposed to protect.

    • kpiz

      This group of Supremes…NOTHING BUT HEARTACHES

    • Jon E. Rosell, III

      The Citizens United decision has disgraced the court and forever blemished the integrity of the entire justice institution.  The judges have proven themselves immoral and corrupt.  The only reason our system works is because we have the utmost respect and trust in the integrity of the Supreme Court.  We no longer have that respect and trust.  The justices and especially the Cheif Justice have proven that they lack integrity and respect for our Republic.  They have proven themselves partisan and lacking in any ethics.  If they do not begin to prove otherwise through their actions and cease all partisan political activity and fund-raising they will forever damage the authority of the Supreme Court as an institution, if not potentially cause riots and unrest in the general population.  A society without trust or respect for its justice system cannot remain free and peaceful for long.

    • Dot Hall

      Many things that go on in our government these days make me angry, but the one thing that makes my blood boil the most is the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court.  How arrogant!

    • Jeff Smith

      Like many others, I was extremely disappointed in the Citizens United decision.  Allowing our elective process to be corrupted by unlimited spending is tantamount to legalized bribery.  This decision must be rescinded because it is the right thing to do.

    • John Naylor

      Get rid of Citizens United and All those lobbyist! Get the $$$ out of politics! It’s time to represent WE the People not corporate interests in executive, legislative, and the jud